Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Channel Hong Kong
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Disney Channel Asia. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:48, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Disney Channel Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks notability, there is no references or sources --TBrandley (talk) 04:59, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 17. Snotbot t • c » 10:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A frequently advertised channel. 147.8.102.172 (talk) 07:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)— 147.8.102.172 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. and probably a sock[reply]
- Without sources Delete per nom. Specifically !voting to counter the opinion above that something advertised is notable. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:31, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have not looked for sources yet, so I'm not going to jump ahead of myself and !vote "delete". However, I must second SchmuckyTheCat that advertisement of something does not make it suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. 147.8.102.172, there are specific notability guidelines that the topic of any article must meet, such as Wikipedia:Notability. Also, I want to bring up the point that any sources you're going to find are probably going to be in Chinese. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 16:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The writing suggests it is merely a timezone feed of Disney Channel Asia without anything local, and since local Disney Channels are never branded with their region of origination I doubt this article is needed, even as a redirect.Nate • (chatter) 17:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Merge content to Disney Channel Asia. Having a second look at things I still think it's a timezone feed, but the content should be retained in the main network article for Disney Channel Asia. Nate • (chatter) 19:02, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:27, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Disney Channel Asia per Nate's sound reasoning. bd2412 T 19:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Disney Channel Asia, which would improve and expand the Disney Channel Asia article. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:34, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.