Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Puyo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Puyo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find significant coverage of the subject of this WP:BLP, with WP:ROUTINE coverage apparently limited to a single passing mention in a Spanish newspaper. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 22:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Unsourced BLP. Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains(talk) 23:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I was unable to find any substantial coverage (or really anything at all apart from database entries). If there are any reliable sources discussing him, they are likely in Spanish though it doesn't appear Spanish Wikipedia has an article on him. My search was hindered by the current Colombian Energy Minister sharing his name. A7V2 (talk) 10:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – No coverage and no claim to significance. Probably could have been handled with a BLP PROD since it seems very unlikely any sources will be found. 5225C (talk • contributions) 06:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails WP:NMOTORSPORT. -"Ghost of Dan Gurney" 17:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - As per nom... appears to fail WP:NMOTORSPORT Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Insignificant coverage and unreliable sources Juggyevil (talk) 15:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.