Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delia Duca
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Mackensen (talk) 23:52, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delia Duca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ANYBIO - she needs to win Miss Universe otherwise WP:NN, so WP:TOOSOON MJH (talk) 00:06, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Re National Miss Universe - Maybe I'm wrong about these - with the first girl, I noticed that she was the first Miss Universe Nederland to get an article ever. They have no editorial references, but is the national win sufficient? I'm done nominating until I get some feedback.--MJH (talk) 00:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 02:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - instead of nominating a number of articles you could have started a discussion at the Miss Universe main article. Anyway in my opinion winning a national title for a major Beauty pageant such as Miss Universe is notable. Sourcing can be fixed, --BabbaQ (talk) 13:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ONEEVENT, as with other Miss Universe contestant articles without notability elsewhere. Sang'gre Habagat (talk) 13:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to closing admin: Both Habagat and user sue rangel has one thing in common they !voted on all these Miss Universe 2012 contestants AfDs within a few minutes time. And with the same reasonings on them all.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You may want to look at the posting times above. We posted our comments on completely different days. I responded further to this nonsense at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques Christela --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 02:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - sources seem to exist in romanian language websites, I cannot read them but it looks like a qualified person could find enough reliable third-party sources to keep this. JoshuSasori (talk) 12:05, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep We have an established practice where winners of major national competitions are sufficiently notable for an individual article. Repeated common practice is a guideline. As far as my personal interests are concerned, and in consideration of the small amount of information, we might usefully combine some of these., but that should be a general discussion, not here, where it is obviously receiving little attention. So, keep for now. DGG ( talk ) 06:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Miss Universe Romania but only if the additional sources in Romanian language do not provide support for secondary notability. Mabalu (talk) 15:21, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Keep as per FreeRangeFrog's statement on Alexia Viruez AFD. If there is precedent, that's good enough for me. Mabalu (talk) 20:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.