Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Latimer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Only 2 votes, even after having been relisted twice. (non-admin closure) 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 08:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

David Latimer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

David Latimer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBIO - sources are largely interview-based or WP:INHERITED from his company New Frontier Design (which is likely to be notable). MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:10, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Architecture. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:18, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
• Comment Delete Agree that notability of the person is doubtful and the article promotional, but the company New Frontier Design _is_ notable and should be stubbed out from the bio. AncientWalrus (talk) 12:55, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  Person mentioned mostly in passing, notability mostly derived from company as opposed to being notable in and of himself. Article was created by an SPA. AncientWalrus (talk) 09:47, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

  I've now created the company page for New Frontier Design. AncientWalrus (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

  The article has a dubious history, it was twice rejected in AfC, then directly created by a different user without attribution. See: talk discussion, Help desk question AncientWalrus (talk) 14:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

  Article history has been merged AncientWalrus (talk) 21:10, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 20:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would like to hear more opinions on the current state of this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

• Keep. I think the current state of the article adequately demonstrates notability for David Latimer. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:52, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.