Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chubby? Hmmm …
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as non-notable trope. While it might be mentioned within the article on the film critic who coined the phrase, the term itself does not have the notability for a separate article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:49, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Chubby? Hmmm … (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable neologism that appears to be the pet catchphrase of a single film critic (who provides the sole reference). Has received little attention from anyone else so the phrase "popularized" seems a wild exaggeration.
This type of entry is not suitable for Wikipedia although our friends on that OTHER Wiki might be more interested. Failing that, Urban Dictionary. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 21:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC) ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 21:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 22:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 22:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 22:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. I can't find third-party refs on Google News or Books. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 22:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable phrase. LadyofShalott 22:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Stubbleboy 00:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable neologism. Carrite (talk) 05:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I did find things to show that this is being used, but not anything that could show that it's a notable trope.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. I'm unable to find reliable sources which provide coverage about the term, rather than merely use it. Gongshow Talk 23:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom.Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:40, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom as well. SarahStierch (talk) 19:22, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.