Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Spies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Charles Spies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ANYBIO no claims to notability other than he is a working lawyer and started a PAC. -MJH (talk) 22:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi fellows. I just started this article, as the name of this person seems to be involved in several affairs behind Mitt Romney's 2012 campaign (as further described in Restore Our Future and its press links). But, as I just don't know the topic with the necessary depth, I just left the article as a stub, for other better-informed persons to add more information. Best regards, --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 02:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Although he has received a number of mentions for his association with Mitt Romney's presidential bid, there doesn't seem to be much press about him personally - nothing that goes beyond the trivial mentions that will give us a reason to allow his bio to stick. Sorry mate! Ohconfucius ping / poke 04:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: Would it be appropriate for some of the info to be merged into the Restore Our Future article and have this redirect there? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the source on which the entire article relies is from the subject's current employer - clearly not independent. I wouldn't be opposed to a redirect if others believe there is some value in that. Stalwart111 12:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.