Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CarReg UK

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 00:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CarReg UK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NCORP KH-1 (talk) 00:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I've fixed the citation issue. A before search on Google reveals that "CarReg UK" meets the WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV especially within the English world. Consider keeping this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zazi Culze (talkcontribs) 10:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as it stands - rests on primary and WP:GUNREL sources. Google hits are not a measure of notability, please review WP:NCORP - David Gerard (talk) 09:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: There are occasional articles about personalised number plates which quote the company founder, such as those referenced in the present article and this BBC item. These don't provide the depth of coverage about the company needed for WP:CORPDEPTH; the most detailed that I can see is a 2021 "London Post" item ("CarReg Private Number Plates Celebrating 33 Years!" - link blocked here) but that is advertorial in tone. Overall, fails to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 15:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.