Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canada Day Countdown
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:52, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Canada Day Countdown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to fail WP:EVENT, specifically WP:GEOSCOPE. Has been tagged as needing sources since July 2014, still no sources. Dbrodbeck (talk) 10:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete While the article does not have references, WP:BEFORE assumes that we are to look for them. I did and couldn't find any except http://www.country94.ca/news/canada-day-countdown-underway and http://thewave.ca/news/canada-day-countdown-underway, which are identical. Likely the same staff of writers. Nothing to meet WP:GNG. Thanks for nominating. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Vaselineeeeeeee (talk) 21:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment to be clear, I did look for refs, found the ones above and then went the AFD route. Dbrodbeck (talk) 13:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Article has no place in an encyclopedia in its current form. 64.229.246.209 (talk) 22:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete at best for now as none of this suggests better independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.