Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cactus Flat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sandstein 06:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cactus Flat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One of over 200,000 USGS HUCs that are not all notable. Major watersheds and the like can be notable but the little features that are not well know do not need an article. This one simply does not meet the notability guidelines. I did consider merging some of this into the articles on the Nellis range, but there is nothing to really merge. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral Unlike some of the similar articles, this one could be rewritten to be about the physical feature rather than the HUC, I'm not sure whether there's much to say about it though. Kmusser (talk) 18:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rewrite per Kmusser. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 00:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep and probably re-write per Kmusser. I'm not an expert on this topic, but it does seem to have some significant coverage. [1][2][3]--Oakshade (talk) 07:44, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. per Wikipedia:Notability (geography). Just needs some cleanup. --Mike Cline (talk) 12:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.