Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bolivar railway station

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bolivar railway station

[edit]
Bolivar railway station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a non-notable railway passing loop not a railway station. Information on the intermodal hub is covered in the Edinburgh, South Australia article. BarossaV (talk) 11:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete with caveat. I am very staunchly inclusionist when it comes to current and former passenger railway stations due to the abundance of reliable sources on railway history; however, unless there was ever an actual station here (and this can be proved in WP:RS) then it's not notable. If it turns out during this AfD there was a passenger station there once, consider this a keep. The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the Drover's Wife. This appears to be a crossing loop, essentially a named location on an employee timetable. If there was actually a station here then that's a different matter. Mackensen (talk) 01:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment as nominator Agree with Drover's Wife. If it can be proved that a station existed, then would agree with the nomination being withdrawn. To date have not been able to locate any evidence of this. BarossaV (talk) 09:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, I'm as big an inclusionist as you'll find where named places are concerned, but even I have to admit an article for a passing loop is pushing it. Lankiveil (speak to me) 01:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bolivar_railway_station&oldid=1070436013"