Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueSnap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 06:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

BlueSnap

BlueSnap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant advertising and the history itself shows it especially since the one user who started it was heavily involved with other similar advertising campaigns, making it self-explanatory as it is, and to make matters worse, this explicitly shows that any "coverage" is only published and republished advertising, basically what the listed sources here are, therefore nowhere in hell's chance of making it actual coverage. Every single source listed here is literally from trivial business publications and everything here emphasizes it, regardless of "hey, but it's a source!". If this isn't an overblown advertisement, it's obvious anything was added to simply make it as packed as it could be, but without any actual substance. What's else is that WP:NOT policy itself allows removal of this, something of which other guidelines are not equipped with. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as corporate spam / office directory / award listing / etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:27, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

• Delete. relatively minor company, with minor awards, and the references are what your'd expect---PR and notices, No place in an encyclopedia DGG ( talk ) 09:36, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
• Delete no WP:RS to show this minor company is indeed notable to be on Wikipedia. 09:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.