Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bennett Graham
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Bennett Graham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is just an ad for his website, notability warn since Apr 2009, no improvement Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 06:38, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are multiple issues here, such as this article being pretty blatant spam/promotion for the artist as well as the overabundance of pictures. The most important one and the one most pertinent to the AfD is that there seems to have been no in-depth coverage for this guy in any reliable and independent sources.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 18:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 18:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I found no evidence that this person meets the guidelines. AllyD (talk) 21:22, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources, plus it is spam, spam, spam! -- Whpq (talk) 17:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the only remotely RS I found was a local news article here, which isn't anywhere near enough. Mabalu (talk) 12:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.