Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeSweet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- BeSweet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no notability. This software fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability stated or found. No references provided. Not sure what the external links to information about the wider doom9.net domain, on which the official site is hosted, are meant to provide. AFAICT, they help demonstrate the non-notability of the subject as BeSweet doesn't register in popular search terms. Pit-yacker (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I would suggest moving it to Gordian Knot (software) (according to WikiProject Software To Do List entry) for further development of the article. It might be considered of historical significance, though at the peak of relevance it was hard to find any info about it outside Doom9's forums. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 09:57, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:32, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.