Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asif Pervez
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:39, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Asif Pervez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ANYBIO, the references are to self-provided biographies provided to work related conferences, and work related PR. No independent editorial coverage or claims to notability, other than that this is a man with a job. I'm sure he is a good person though. MJH (talk) 22:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 02:25, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please, guide me which kind of references would work? TanweerIKhan 06:41, 8 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickaang (talk • contribs)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
He has been covered in many Pakistani news. Please, check the references. NickAang 15:44, 14 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickaang (talk • contribs)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly fails WP:BIO. Sources contained within the article do little more than confirm the existence of such a person, with no indicia of significance. RayTalk 20:15, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't appear at all notable. --Michig (talk) 08:28, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.