Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian Centre for Human Rights

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Asian Centre for Human Rights

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Asian Centre for Human Rights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-profit that appears to be non-notable. Could not find sources to validate notability and the article itself is poorly sourced with some neutrality concerns. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 18:28, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:22, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:22, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

• Google gave me eight different sources. Rathfelder (talk) 12:43, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

• Comment - @Rathfelder: - you can't just say google has references - you need to actually link to a couple of the best ones, even if you choose not to add them to the article. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
• I can. The question is "Is the organisation notable?", not "Is it properly referenced?".Rathfelder (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.