Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Leszczyńska (1660–1727)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Daniel (talk) 22:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Anna Leszczyńska (1660–1727)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Anna Leszczyńska (1660–1727) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable noblewoman. Seems to only have notability due to being a relative of notable people, which seems to be a case of WP:INHERIT. Browsing across the web shown nothing remotely able to give her enough notability to have an article. ''Flux55'' (talk) 17:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, and Poland. ''Flux55'' (talk) 17:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Keep. I cannot find any sources about her, pl wiki article is completely unreferenced and even shorter. I'll AfD it there - there is a small chance someone else will find sources (I'll report here if they do), and, sadly, equal chance folks there will just pile on with 'mother of Polish king has inherent notability' or similar, as Polish wiki is more inclusionist. Oh well, not our problem. PS. Searching more under a name variant "Anna z Jabłonowskich Leszczyńska". Snippet views in [1] suggest potential notability - at least there are several sentences about her, unfortunately mostly not visible, but what I see suggests she was involved in court politics. This snippet mentions she had a strong connection to her son, eventual king. Similar content is in the snippet here; she is called the "real soul of the kings] court". Another snippet where it is said she had a major influence on her son: [2]. Ditto here. While I cannot be sure at this point which of these meet WP:SIGCOV, I think she is notable. PPS. I've added a bit to pl wiki, and can add it here if the article is kept. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

• Keep. (1) There are wp:disambigation Anna Leszczyńska and another szlachcianka Anna Jabłonowska. (2) Arguments and sources of Prokonsul Piotrus are completely convincing. — Yuri V. (t•c) 19:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC).
• Keep per Piotrus. She is historical figure who played involved in court politics of Poland, Scholars and modern historian called her as "real soul of the kings". 1.46.91.225 (talk) 06:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
• Keep. As indicated in the sources provided by User:Piotrus, the coverage of this individual (while not extensive) is certainly not trivial and therefore enough to pass WP:GNG. Marquisate (talk) 02:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
• Keep per the sources adduced above. Has sufficient coverage to support notability. Eluchil404 (talk) 02:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.