Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Stricko

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Faber Drive. Per WP:NPASR (non-admin closure)UY Scuti Talk 14:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Stricko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The only reliable sources that exist deal more with the band he was in (Faber Drive) rather than the artist himself; since the band seems barely notable itself, WP:INHERIT applies here. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 21:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 22:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 22:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:49, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per WP:MUSICBIO, a musician whose notability is band-dependent, and who cannot be reliably sourced as having any independent notability separate from the band, gets a redirect to the band and not a standalone BLP — but this claims, and even more importantly sources, nothing that would make him eligible for a standalone article. Redirect to Faber Drive — although I note that even the band's article is entirely unsourced, and may itself be vulnerable to deletion if it can't be upreffed to a keepable standard. Bearcat (talk) 17:57, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 01:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist Yellow Dingo (talk) 06:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 06:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.