Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amor Artificial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 18:14, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Amor Artificial

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Amor Artificial (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1. There is no evidence of this band existing, the name is too common and returns no results relating to bands 2. Website no longer exists including a link to the band's album (Waybackmachine returns 0 results 3. Likely would have failed WP:Notability Theprussian (talk) 22:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

• Delete: I just did a WP:BEFORE on the band itself, and only found one example of significant coverage. No reason to think this album is notable, and even if it was, WP:NALBUM recommends merging album articles with the artist page in instances where the article is unlikely to expand beyond a stub. This one is only a track listing, with no apparent sources for expanding it. If the band's article is kept at its AfD discussion, this should be redirected there. Skeletor3000 (talk) 23:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

• Delete per Skeletor3000. I would normally go with a redirect for something like this, but since the article on the bad is up AfD as well, I think a deletion would be a better option. Aoba47 (talk) 18:25, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete I don't believe this is a WP:HOAX, but if there is such little sourcing that this was ever a realistic possibility, delete is the only rational conclusion. BIG BURLEY 23:07, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete - See the band's AfD as well. They really did exist but their article is probably on its way to deletion. If it survives this album article could possibly be redirected to the band, but the album achieved no pro reviews or other reliable media notice, and all sources found are the typical streaming and retail services. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

• Comment Yeah it can be redirected if more work is not done on it but eventually it should head on for deletion if it isn't a hoax. LeungChow (talk) 13:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.