Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Angels- Baptism of Blood
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- American Angels- Baptism of Blood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I deprodded as another editor had added the 'rescue' tag, but after a search I can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources for this video, only some one liners copied off All Movie Guide. I think we need to consign this article to the bargain bin of history. Fences&Windows 02:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 02:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 02:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, doesn't meet Wikipedia:Notability (films). Nikki♥311 02:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I tried to expand the article when it was posted at WP:ARS but found nothing. P.S. love the metaphor Fences and windows. J04n(talk page) 02:53, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 21:31, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Am looking into this. Seems it might just meet WP:NF [1] [2] [3]. Will see what can be done and report back. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:NF clearly on four of the five main points, and on the fifth the three links Schmidt provided don't quite make the grade IMO. If there was a category under speedy for films under "articles fails to indicate it's importance" I'd be using it with this. !! Justa Punk !! 12:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.