Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almohad conquest of Tripoli
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Almohad conquest of Tripoli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article doesn't meet WP:GNG and is full of WP:OR, fluff and sources misrepresentation. The Almohads didn't "conquer" Tripoli as its citizens rebelled against the Normans when the Almohad reached Ifriqiya (this is what the sources say in passing). M.Bitton (talk) 18:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Libya. M.Bitton (talk) 18:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. It is an unreliable article which, if retained, would need a full rewrite with closer attention paid to actual sources. Personally, I don't think it warrants even that as we have articles on Ifriqiya and the Almohads. I think those should cover events in Tripoli which, as you say, are not significant enough for a standalone article. PearlyGigs (talk) 22:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant to Almohad conquest of Norman Africa. This reduplication of material is getting absurd. Srnec (talk) 23:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.