Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algemene Nedersaksiese Schriefwieze

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:25, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Algemene Nedersaksiese Schriefwieze

[edit]
Algemene Nedersaksiese Schriefwieze (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline" It was deprodded by User:Prisencolin with no rationale at all, which violates WP:PROD procedure. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding without giving a reason is bad style but it's not against policy, Piotrus. As WP:DEPROD states, giving a reason is "encouraged, but not required". Uanfala (talk) 11:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:Too soon, if nothing else. The cited magazine piece and this Wikipedia article are the only places I can find that refer to the orthography. (And to forestall sticklers who object to me citing an essay: the article has not "received significant coverage in reliable sources", which is policy.) Cnilep (talk) 00:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not official but developed by the Nedersaksian community of Wikipedia. The Banner talk 06:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the article Algemene Nedersaksiese Schriefwieze states clearly: (in translation) 'The Algemene Nedersaksiese Schriefwieze (short: ANS) is in 2011 developed by the Nedersaksian Community of Wikipedia'. It has no official status. →Σσς. (Sigma) 06:54, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Algemene_Nedersaksiese_Schriefwieze&oldid=1137553324"