Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Preziosi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:08, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Preziosi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don’t think the subject of this article meets notability requirements. The article has three sources, one of which is dead. The second one does not even mention Preziosi, and is the basis of the second half if the article. The first half of the article is based on the single traceable source which is about Preziosi. This topic may (possibly) warrant a brief mention in the article on Qaddafi, but is not sufficient for an article on Preziosi. Mccapra (talk) 05:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Libya-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Possibly redirect to Muammar Gaddafi if this gets mentioned there (not sure it is DUE - seems to be one possible story). Notability in WP:NOTINHERITED (nor sired) and in this case we a have a story of a possible tent liaison in 1940 which has received some limited and passing coverage (e.g. [1][2][3]). Preziosi doesn't pass WP:SOLDIER, it doesn't seem there is much to the stories beyond passing mentions of this possibility - so this is in WP:BIO1E turf as well. I don't think we need to merge this to Gaddafi - it's not certain this is DUE for inclusion at all there - and if it is then about a sentence in Muammar Gaddafi#Early life. 14:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete This articles boils down to reporting unsubstantiated gossip.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Even assuming that the article is more than gossip and local legend (and there's not a lot of evidence of that), I'm still not seeing anything that makes the subject notable. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:56, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- conceivably briefly merge to Muammar Gaddafi. However the whole thing has the feel of an ATTACK FRINGE theory. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.