Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abated Mass of Flesh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abated Mass of Flesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a band, sourced entirely to blogs, Facebook posts and a simple "band directory" page, of a band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. They're an unsigned band whose EPs and album were all released independently, so the number of releases here doesn't get them over NMUSIC #5 (which requires a record label) -- but no other claim of notability is even attempted here. A band like this could still get a Wikipedia article if enough reliable source coverage were present to satisfy WP:GNG, but they're not entitled to one just because they exist, and the sourcing here doesn't cut it in the slightest. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 03:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, looking back on it, its not that good. Unfortunately the band just isn't big enough to have huge sites talk about them. Sorry for creating it and wasting your time, guys Impendingdoom240 (talk) 04:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as still questionable, searches at Blabbermouth, Kerrang! and Terrorizer found nothing better convincing. SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.