Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABBYY

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to ABBYY FineReader. (non-admin closure) buidhe 15:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

ABBYY

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

ABBYY (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a none notable software company. All the sources are to either press releases or the companies website. Nothing comes up in a Google search either. Except for trivial coverage that doesn't pass WP:NCORP. Adamant1 (talk) 23:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

• Delete: non-notable, fails WP:NCORP. - Ahunt (talk) 23:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:15, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:15, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

• Redirect To ABBYY FineReader. Plausible search term. May be delete and redirect. Pavlor (talk) 08:18, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

I'd be fine with that. It seems like that article has questionable notability also though. I might do an AfD for it to. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

• Redirect without deletion to ABBYY FineReader, as some of the information about the company can be reused there. @User:Adamant1: The software itself seems notable based on the citations there, so I would recommend against an AfD for that page. Modernponderer (talk) 17:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

I wasn't going to do an AfD on it. It was just a general comment. I think if this article was redirected there it would boast it some. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

• Redirect for now. Would be willing to take a look at ABBYY FineReader later. Certainly not enough to support two separate articles. Glendoremus (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
• Redirect seems like the sensible decision for now as suggested above although I'm not overly impressed with the destination either. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.