User talk:Waimze

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your submission at Articles for creation: Venetia Scott (August 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Multiple claims lack sources (e.g., the whole contributions section). In addition, it is materially comprised of direct quotations which by their very nature make this article not sufficiently neutral or sourced. We need to hear what other people said about her, not what she says about herself.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MarcGarver (talk) 07:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Waimze! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarcGarver (talk) 07:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I only just saw your message after submitting another draft for review or I would have joined you at Teahouse! I took your advice and worked on the style, stripping the article right back. I've looked at articles of contemporaries and hope I've got the balance right now! Waimze (talk) 21:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Venetia Scott (January 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Entire sections are unsourced, and much of the content reads promotionally. See WP:COI.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 10:46, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Venetia Scott (September 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OLIfanofmrtennant 06:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Venetia Scott has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Venetia Scott. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 08:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Venetia Scott (January 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Likely a very notable subject, but the article needs to be more concise and stick to the facts and avoid the puffery. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 10:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spinster300 (talk) 10:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your first article

[edit]

Hi there, Waimze. I'm happy to see Venetia Scott has finally appeared on main space. If you intend to continue writing biographies of women, you might find it useful to join WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Ipigott, I’ll do so. It’s good to see there is movement to redress the imbalance. Waimze (talk) 10:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Waimze&oldid=1206876138"