User talk:Touchmeets

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Touchmeets (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Certainly not a troll, and not a sockpuppet in the conventional sense either. Also lottery system was not original resarch. Lottery systems are big business (of the con variety, mostly!) - see this google search or a reliable source or even an unreliable one. It was poorly written perhaps, but I've just come back to improve on it substantially (as I said I would) and find myself blocked. If you want me to keep out of RfA then fine, but please unblock this account so I can get to work on said article - please restore it too so that I have a framework to be starting on.

Alternatively, I am happy to work on it in userspace until it reaches a standard someone deems appropriate.

Decline reason:

You're pretty clearly a sockpuppet of some sort. If you are going to be unblocked, being a bit more forward about that and your intentions is going to be necessary. — Vassyana 02:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Touchmeets (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a conventional sockpuppet because I don't have a proper Wikipedia account, I move between accounts constantly as I've seen what happens to users who don't. And as I say, my main intent (at the moment) is to recreate that article and get it to at least b-class status.

Decline reason:

Sorry, still not a good enough reason for unblocking. Sockpuppets to avoid blocks and work on articles are not allowed. — ^demon[omg plz] 17:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Touchmeets (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not avoiding any blocks!

Decline reason:

You stated: I move between accounts constantly as I've seen what happens to users who don't. WP:SOCK makes clear that using socks to avoid scrutiny from other editors is forbidden. Denied. — IrishGuy talk 17:54, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Touchmeets (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not attempting to avoid scruitiny from other editors, quite the reverse. I'm attempting to avoid scruitiny from people in real life - we all know what can happen then. I'm very happy for each and every one of my edits to be scruitinised. Linking them all together is something that I would have a problem with, because of the real risk of outing / stalking by the likes of Brandt or Bagley. And as I've said, I'm not avoiding blocks by using socks. Not a single one of my accounts has been blocked, warned, censured, etc. I have loads of socks, actually. I'm fighting this block not because I cannot get around it (doing so would be trivial), but because of the principle that is at stake.

Decline reason:

Three of my fellow administrators have already declined your unblock, and I agree with their reasons for doing so. Please e-mail the arbitration committee if you wish to appeal further. — krimpet⟲ 20:00, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Touchmeets&oldid=1061537025"