User talk:SirSlobodan6969

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Insults Disregard and Antagonising from a commenter

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. signed, Willondon (talk) 14:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No offense Sir Willondon but I have honestly no idea what you are waffling about the only thing that I have done on the wiki was create an account and after that went to visit my family in Slough. I genuinely find any statement claiming that my edits (despite me personally not making any edits yet) constituting vandalism to be quite preposterous and honestly (pardon my french) Bullshit! This is due to the fact that I have not been involved in any "edits" because as I said earlier I was visiting my nan down south. To summarise I am heavily insulted of this accusation as I both left my electronic devices back home in Birmingham and could therefore not have done any "editing" Signed SirSlobodan6969 SirSlobodan6969 (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should be aware of Special:contributions/SirSlobodan6969, which shows that you made six edits across two articles, with both articles being vandalized. [1], [2] So did you set up your account then leave for a visit, then meanwhile, somebody was able to get into your account to vandalize? Has your account been compromised? In that case it needs recommended for an indefinite block. Or should I interpret your effusive indignation as the common sign that your post is complete unpardonable French? Either way, I'll leave you with this:

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you, or somebody you have carelessly allowed to edit under your name, vandalize Wikipedia. signed, Willondon (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not even heard of a "northumbria police incident" which is what the link came from and i have every right to respond "effusively" as this is something that I have not even been involved in which as i have now repeatedly said i have been caring for my ailing nan. The only people who might have done this is my younger brother but i would find no logic in that. I do either not know about any "Daniel Balding" who was so called edited in by me who was away from my electronic devices busy in the other side of the country. But however you still insist to insult both me by disregarding my genuine and honest concern as "effusive" which i find insulting. I also find no logic in your statement that i might have been hacked since no hacker would find anything of value in a wikipedia account. Also your adressing of my concern and worry was snarky and extremely and then threaten to punish me for the actions of a person i am not affiliated with? I do not care if you pardon my french this time qnd ill leave you with this, expect no further response:
- You were a prick to me when I responded concerned and clearly not understanding of the situation by acting superior and snarky
-You threatened to have my account banned to spite me when you clearly were told multiple times that i could clearly not have been involved
-It is clear that you not only insult me, critisize when I was worried about the situation and obviously couldn't type in a fully formal tone. You then also went on to threaten a ban on me from editing and then threaten to punish me for the actions of another person. That is why i consider you a dickhead SirSlobodan6969 (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  5 albert square (talk) 23:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]