User talk:RBFolkArt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cornelio Campos (June 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Waqarđź’¬ 18:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, RBFolkArt! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Waqarđź’¬ 18:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cornelio Campos (June 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 19:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello RBFolkArt! Your additions to Draft:Cornelio Campos have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DanCherek I saw this when I reviewed the draft but I didn't think it was a copyright violation per NC Gov's Terms of Use which states "Unless otherwise noted on an individual document, the state of North Carolina grants permission to copy and distribute non-image files, documents, and information for non-commercial use, provided they are copied and distributed without alteration." They do restrict use of images though. Is this really a copyright violation? S0091 (talk) 15:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The prohibition on commercial reuse makes it an incompatible license, per WP:COMPLIC. The prohibition on alteration is problematic as well, since they're restricting the creation of derivative works. Based on RBFolkArt's second edit, it might be possible that the NC Arts Council wants to release this text under a compatibly free license, but we'd need verification of that. DanCherek (talk) 15:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, ok. That makes sense. Thanks @DanCherek. S0091 (talk) 15:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi RBFolkArt, given you are an intern, even if not paid, you do need to make a paid editing disclosure per Wikipedia's Terms of Use and the Paid editing policy. You can do so by placing {{paid|employer=North Carolina Arts Council}} on your User page (include the curly brackets).

As for the draft, please see Your first article along with the notability guidelines for artists. Generally, notability is met by critical reviews of an artist's work by reputable publications or other in-depth coverage by multiple sources. I will also leave some additional information about editing Wikipedia. No worries about the mishaps. You are a new editor and we see all the time. S0091 (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I took the liberty to add some sources. You should have access to most of them which you can use to expand the draft but just be sure to use your own words. Campos is certainly notable. S0091 (talk) 17:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much. I'm interning with North Carolina Arts Council and they have tasked me with creating a page for each North Carolina Heritage Award Recipient. I am new to do this so any feedback and help is greatly appreciated. RBFolkArt (talk) 18:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, RBFolkArt!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 16:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cornelio Campos has been accepted

[edit]
Cornelio Campos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 20:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rhonda Gouge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ncarts.org/blog/2022/10/17/2023-north-carolina-heritage-award-recipients. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. C F A đź’¬ 20:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As noted above, unless the text has been donated, Wikipedia cannot accept text under a non-commercial license. C F A đź’¬ 20:39, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have fixed the page and would like to submit the draft. RBFolkArt (talk) 16:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. I've submitted the draft for you. C F A đź’¬ 16:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neal Thomas (July 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhonda Gouge (July 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 22:50, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]