User talk:Qwecxzasd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

October 2007

[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User:Yamla. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gscshoyru 23:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Esanchez7587, you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 23:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. SQL(Query Me!) 01:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwecxzasd (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock me. I promise not to vandilse again and if I do you admins can block me immediately again. I am sorry for vandalising. Qwecxzasd 01:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No. Your edits so far have been unforgivably vile. — jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 01:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwecxzasd (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If I vandalise again, block me immediately. So, there are no risks to you admins. Qwecxzasd 21:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

reason — Think of this declination as preventative, I'm preventing you from using more administrative time. Mercury 21:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwecxzasd (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am very sorry. May I please have a second chance? Qwecxzasd 18:29, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, for the same reasons my fellow administrators above have given. --krimpet 21:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.