User talk:Kylion

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Driver side impact has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com./driversideimpact) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 00:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

You have been wtinessed changing genres without any cites or consults from talk pages upon articles such as Matchbook Romance and I Killed the Prom Queen if you do so again you will be recomended to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GunMetal Angel 20:57, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to I Set My Friends On Fire has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 02:37, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Escape the Fate has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Mygerardromance (talk) 17:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everywhere

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 23:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Take The Crown

The article Take The Crown has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adelphia (Album)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Adelphia (Album), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Wires...and the Concept of Breathing. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Band pages

Hi, is there a point to endlessly micro-readjusting the band members' instruments? You do this very often, and I'm not sure it's useful. Chubbles (talk) 00:22, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you continously do this? Many of the edits aren't even what a member of the band plays. • GunMetal Angel 22:13, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Hello. You have recently created two pages, Returners (Album) and Fury And The Fallen Ones. I noticed you created the pages with an {{unreferenced}} tag, and I am wondering why you have done this. Are you aware that creating pages with no references violates Wikipedia's notability guidelines? Can you comment, as I think these two articles qualify for possible speedy deletion. Thanks - ηyχ αμς 21:40, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SWS

Sleeping with sirens album don't have bonus tracks. Don't change it without QUOTE http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/with-ears-to-see-eyes-to-hear/id360773034 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35forMVP (talk • contribs) 06:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop the disruptions

Okay, that's enough. After years now, I am going to uphold to say that Wikipedia is not a playground, please stop your disruptive edits such as adding imaginary positions on band members, adding imaginary bonus tracks to albums released by artists or change genres which is what you initially did, but have since changed into more seemingly less unsenseful contributions. This is a nice request to stop causing problems. -- GunMetal Angel 17:50, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Hope Division for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Hope Division is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hope Division until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]