This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
hi mate, why are you wanting my article deleted? I dont see anything wrong
May 26 2013
Shouldn't you allow the person to complete their page before submitting it for deletion? I created a quick template first as this is my fist article. I intend to edit it extensivly with dates and links to create an autobiography...
What I saw was a typical vanity page with no indication of notability, so no. The problem wasn't a lack of content; I tagged it (and it got deleted under) speedy deletion criterion A7: No indication of importance. Wikipedia:Notability (people) goes into detail on what qualifies as notable. Furthermore, please read Wikipedia:Autobiography. But for future reference: include an indication of importance, include at least one reference (or your biography of a living person will be deleted within 10 days anyway) and please don't write about yourself or other areas where you have a conflict of interest. As for intending to edit it extensively, it helps to develop your article as much as you can before submitting it for creation - a user sandbox can be helpful for this. In addition, to help avoid edit conflicts and some deletion tagging, you can tag an article with {{In creation|time=~~~~~}} to indicate that you're currently editing it. Kolbasz (talk) 01:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
March 2011
You didn't even bother reading the talk page before that reversion, did you? The levels of radiation - i.e. the dose rate (Sv/h) - wasn't too high. The level of radioactivity (Bq/kg) was too high. -- Kolbasz (talk) 13:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
I did not. It appeared to be a pedantic revision. :
Re your Proposed merge at Talk:Flight dynamics (spacecraft). Another editor disagreed with the merge of the two stubish articles into Flight dynamics (spacecraft), but seemed to think that the two little articles might appropriately be merged somewhere. I agree. I think if you withdraw your proposal as it is (or close it?), then it looks likely you would get support on a slightly modified proposal: merge spin-stabilized satellite and 3-axis stabilized spacecraft—which you correctly point out are little more than stubs, despite having been created in 2006 and 2008, respectively—into Attitude control (spacecraft), which is a pretty solid article now, and mentions spin stabilization, etc. Just a thought. Cheers. N2e (talk) 03:07, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Reverted your 1mSv/2.4mSv change on background radiation
Hi Kolbasz,
As we seem to disagree on this (rather minor) point, I have clarified my position on the talk page. See you there.
Hi. When you recently edited Cobalt-60, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Kolbasz - if you want to delete something surely you need to make sure it isn't true. All I added was a fact that a couple of books disputed the moon landings. I gave the correct titles and authors. I didn't say the books were right. I'm merely adding information to this section which, after all, is what wikipedia is about! — Preceding unsigned comment added by UKTab (talk • contribs) 23:09, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radioisotope thermoelectric generator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bellona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
To repeat references, use the named footnote syntax. Name a reference by adding the attribute name="some unique name" to the reference tag itself, like this: <ref name="Freeman">{{cite book |last=Freeman |first=Gregory A. [...]}}</ref>
To cite the same work again, just use <ref name="Freeman" /> (note the space and slash and that there's no closing </ref> tag!). You can also add page numbers with the {{rp|page number(s)}} template after the reference tag to reference specific pages. E.g. "Some statement<ref name="Freeman" />{{rp|98}}" to specifically reference page 98 in Freeman.
Thank you for reviewing my article, Polymorphic Systems (computers). Since you didn't make any comments, I assume you found the article to be OK? I'm new to the whole Wikipedia thing. And I have a question - my article is not showing up on the drop-down list when one types Polymorphic Systems into the Wikipedia search box. Is there a way to make this happen? Thanks again. Rdb112 (talk) 12:37, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm using the regular page feed and not page curation, so my review options are limited to "Mark page as patrolled". I'm also browsing without javascript, so can't help you with the drop-down list. Sorry. Kolbasz (talk) 15:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Flora in Uruguay or Flora of Uruguay?
Either way. Both articles have been nominated for deletion. Too bad. I have made some new editions and added pictures, more text based on reliable sources and it looked like an article.
Please, check it out again before deleting it Will you take the time, please? I have worked very hard on Flora in Uruguay and it is part of a project.
I know that some people find it easy to nominate an article for deletion, much easier than helping or contributing to an article, huh. This way, you are not welcoming new comers at all. Quite the opposite. Is this a Baptism of fire?
Dear Kolbasz (talk) The reasons for deleting an article based on the fact that there is a similar article which has been nominated for deletion just doesn't add up. The reason why I created a new article named Flora in Uruguay was because the previous article Flora of Uruguay had been nominated for deletion and was rather incomplete. Now, having both of the articles nominated without a serious review, what else can I do? I have added pictures, reliable sources, good text. Is this a baptism of fire? lol Roxyuru (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
You may have gotten a previous article deleted, but the Flora of Uruguay you created at timestamp 2013-05-31T13:57:20 has never been tagged for deletion - it's been touched by exactly one editor besides you, who simply added a category. Despite that, you created a duplicate article just 20 minutes later (2013-05-31T14:15:28). Thus, the second article should be speedily deleted under criterion A10. Kolbasz (talk) 18:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello Kolbasz. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Functional vegetology, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I don't think it is promotional enough for G11, but it seems WP:NOR and WP:NEO; will check and probably take to AfD. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 19:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the note about the article which I created about Stream of Sound could be getting deleted - it appears that, by the time I got your message, the article had already been deleted. I do not wish to challenge this - I just thought I would let you know that I got your message. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:02, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rolls-Royce Gnome may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
licence to manufacture the T58 was purchased in 1958. The T58 had begun bench testing in 1955ref>''Flight'' 18 March 1960 p383</ref> and by 1958 had already been used in helicopters and de
leave the parameter blank (do not delete it). For additional lines, end your alt units with )</li> and start a new, fully-formatted line with <li> -->
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kirobo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Facial recognition and Voice recognition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rolls-Royce Gnome may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.