User talk:Florenda

I have replaced the speedy deletion tags on University of WCMA. The issue is not the format. The issue is that no notability is asserted and it appears to have been written for promotional purposes. Pan Dan 15:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

University of WCMA

Please do not create this article to talk about its merits. If you would like to discuss Wikipedia policies, you can do so at this talk page. If you want to contest the deletion, you can do so at deletion review. Pan Dan 13:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Daniel Briggs

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that Daniel Briggs meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Briggs. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Pan Dan 13:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: List of Mental Health Software Development Companies

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that List of Mental Health Software Development Companies meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mental Health Software Development Companies. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Pan Dan 14:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Your edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Daniel Briggs. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Pan Dan 14:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

World christian ministries association

Please stop creating these articles. If you disagree with a deletion, follow the instructions at deletion review. Pan Dan 14:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia policies

In response to your comment at Talk:University of WCMA,

The person tagging this page has a hx of tagging what they do not like (opinion)...has nothing to do with correct format and information nearly identical to all other similar wikipedia contributions...said taggers should discontinue blatant disregard for wikipedias' need for quality worthy contributions...shame...take your opinions else where.

-- you might like to read Wikipedia's policies on reliable sources, what Wikipedia is not, and neutral point of view. Also check out what notability means. If a subject has not been featured in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, then it is impossible to write a comprehensive encyclopedia article on that subject. That's why we delete articles on subjects like these. If you can find reliable sources, independent of WCMA, that discuss WCMA in depth, then please add those sources to the article; they will be evaluated in the deletion discussion and the article might end up being kept. Pan Dan 15:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop deleting articles that have already been approved and processed. You, Pan Dan are one of the major reasons why wikipedia cannot gain world class credibility.

World Christian Ministries Association

Please don't re-create this article under a new name. It was deleted (as you well know) after an articles for deletion debate, here. If you disagree with my close (i.e., that I closed it out of process, without consensus, etc., you have the option of bringing your concerns to Wikipedia:Deletion review. Simply reposting the content will not be fruitful. Further, do not add any further text to closed deletion debates. Finally, and most importantly, you must stop posting text attacking Pan Dan's (or any other user's) character.--Fuhghettaboutit 16:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

You have not right to delete an article based on one opinion...the article was reviewed and discussed long ago by others and approved...if you keep violating wikipedia processes, you will be reported. You are the only view and it does not make it neutral nor do you do your homework...I did.

It was not deleted based on one opinion. A review of the deletion debate shows that five editors discussed the article, not including the deletion debate nominator, and consensus was formed that it should be deleted.--Fuhghettaboutit 16:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Daniel A Briggs

Once again, please stop reposting content that was deleted after an articles for deletion debate. If you continue to do so you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.--Fuhghettaboutit 16:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Recreation of both articles

I see you have again recreated both Daniel A Briggs and World Christian Ministries Association. This is your last warning. The next time you recreate this content under any name you will be blocked from editing.--Fuhghettaboutit 16:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Krimpet (talk) 17:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop (again)

Editing under your IP address and posting the same content is rather transparent. Once again, please don't change text in closed AFD debates and don't post material attacking other editors.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:12, 25 May 2007 (UTC)