User talk:Carl2007
Your recent edit to Lucas Pezzini Leiva (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Arbeloa03.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Arbeloa03.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Agger.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Agger.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Agger.jpg
[edit]
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Agger.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Lucas_Pezzini_Leiva.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Lucas_Pezzini_Leiva.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
October 2008
[edit]
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Keirrison de Souza Carneiro. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
November 2008
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Glenn McCrory has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Touch Of Light (talk) 05:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Soccerpulse constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Touch Of Light (talk) 05:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)