User talk:Capped22

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthew Shoemaker (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matthew Shoemaker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 14:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for flagging potential issues. Can you let me know which sources in particular are problematic so I can fix this asap? 2605:B100:305:B7A5:49EA:1CF:5C6D:54AE (talk) 14:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Capped22! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 14:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthew Shoemaker (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matthew Shoemaker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for relaying this concern. I can't say I agree with the characterization, however. For example, here are links to recent national media coverage https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-more-small-towns-in-canada-will-be-able-to-choose-which-immigrants-can/ https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-opioid-crisis-canada-small-towns/ https://www.tvo.org/video/why-a-northern-city-reversed-its-english-only-policy. Can you reconsider? Capped22 (talk) 17:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Capped22. The characterisation is a reflection of Wikipedia guidelines. Moreover, it's not for me to reconsider. You could make appropriate changes to the article to incorporate material supported by citations such as those you mention, then resubmit the article for review. Thanks. Paul W (talk) 13:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the helpful follow up. I'll do so! Capped22 (talk) 13:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)