User talk:Anoopspeaks

9th South Indian International Movie Awards - Vidhu Ayyanna

Would you mind explaining how the subject fails WP:N and WP:V? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

@Jeraxmoira The draft document failed twice. Also, I only see a single verified source about the subject per WP:ICTFSOURCES, and that source does not cover enough to publish it as a document. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

The evaluation of a draft has no weightage over red links. The single verifiable source you mentioned is sufficient as the subject has played a major role in co-creating a collective body of work i.e. his filmography, see WP:CREATIVE #4.

For WP:V, you can verify the same on the respective film articles. His collective body of work has been the primary subject of multiple independent reviews. Here is an example. Let me know if you need more reviews to verify.

W.r.t Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, it does not violate any of the sections listed on WP:BLP. There is nothing controversial or challengeable here, so unless you have other concerns, please add the red link back. Cheers Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

@Jeraxmoira If the information is sufficient, why not publish the article and link the subject to it instead of providing a red link? I have no objection to creating a new article, but people often add red links, and they remain there indefinitely. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 07:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Isn't that the purpose of red links? To indicate that sooner or later an article will be created about a likely notable person or topic by any interested contributor. It doesn't matter if it exists indefinitely as no one is on a timeline here, unless the article is full of red links, which messes with the readability. FWIW, the version you saw on WP:REDBIO has been reverted, as it was added by a sock without prior consensus. Either way, I have a separate draft here. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

@Jeraxmoira Then what's stopping you from publishing it? Anoop Bhatia (talk) 07:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Because I am still working on it. How does publishing an article relevant to your decision to remove the red links? Unless you have any policy grounds apart from the notability concerns which were addressed above, please revert your edit on 9th South Indian International Movie Awards and November Story. Unless you think that Wikipedia should not have any coverage on this subject, you are violating the editing guideline here. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:39, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

@Jeraxmoira Draft:Vidhu Ayyanna was declined by three reviewers for various reasons. This suggests that the subject may not meet Wikipedia's notability standards. If you find this assessment contradictory, you should either prove the subject's notability by publishing the article yourself, since you are a page reviewer, or make the necessary changes to the article and call for a review. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 08:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

As this is not a content disagreement, are you okay if we get an unofficial third opinion on this? The editor I have in mind is User:Robert McClenon, who seems to have worked extensively on Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

@Jeraxmoira I have no issues. If two or more people accept that your sources meet Wikipedia's verifiability standards on the subject, why should I object? Anoop Bhatia (talk) 09:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Robert McClenon. Would you be kind enough to provide an unofficial third opinion on Whether to add a red link of a likely notable person to an article? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Just a note about Baak

I modified the page to keep the bulk of your edit. The issue was that the table was including many names from the dubbed portions of the film (i. e. Shiva Shankar) and putting the name of the film in the infobox. The only parts of the film we care about are the original language portions and the reshot portions in another language (Telugu). If the reshot portions constitute a majority of the film, then you can put the title in the infobox, but notice how regardless, we will both languages in the infobox. The dubbed portions and character names hold no significance and can confuse the average reader to mistake it for a Telugu proper bilingual.

Only the two cast replacements matter in the Baak#Cast section since they were sourced in the Baak#Production section. The reshooting of other portions was not sourced so no need to include them. The new format reflects similar films such as Something Something (by the same director), Lakshmi (specifically the Telugu version) and Aakasamantha. Adding a cast table to any of the films can get confusing and tables are only needed for simultaneous shoots not partial reshoots. DareshMohan (talk) 06:29, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

@DareshMohan What about the reference points because the end credits lack character names, Also do you know who distributed the film in Tamil? Anoop Bhatia (talk) 06:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Not sure about the distribution, but I can readd the reference points sure. DareshMohan (talk) 06:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

@DareshMohan Thanks. It's surprising that nobody seems to know the distributor's name for the Tamil version. Also, please take a look at the Aranmanai (film series) and correct any inaccuracies. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 06:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)