User talk:180.95.18.33

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warnings

[edit]
Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

July 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Eskimo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 04:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Eskimo. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 04:30, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ϫ 04:19, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for Vandalism. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Ϫ 04:34, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Robert Louis Stevenson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 23:18, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Robert Louis Stevenson. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 23:24, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Robert Louis Stevenson. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Wyatt915 23:31, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 55 hours, for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhullandemu 23:39, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Sewage treatment has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. SeaphotoTalk 01:27, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sewage treatment. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sewage treatment. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. SeaphotoTalk 01:30, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Sewage treatment. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Tiderolls 01:38, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:44, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Regiomontanus, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Regiomontanus was changed by 180.95.18.33 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-08-19T01:26:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Kiribati. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 02:42, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Transistor. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 23:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

October 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Space burial, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 22:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Animals in space. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. This particular incident was located with the assistance of STiki. Thank you! --  ʄlame (report mistake) 01:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Unemployment has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Kgasso (talk) 04:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Unemployment. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Kgasso (talk) 04:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Structural unemployment has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 00:09, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Structural unemployment. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 00:14, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hypertext Transfer Protocol, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --M4gnum0n (talk) 11:25, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Brittany, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hamilton, Victoria, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Merino. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Merino. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. WAYNEOLAJUWON 22:44, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Dartmoor, Victoria. WAYNEOLAJUWON 22:45, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Brittany has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tomayres (talk) 23:54, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to JonBenét Ramsey. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tomayres (talk) 00:18, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to JonBenét Ramsey. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tomayres (talk) 00:22, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to JonBenét Ramsey. Tomayres (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hamilton, Victoria, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Muse (band). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Funandtrvl (talk) 03:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Hamilton, Victoria. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Funandtrvl (talk) 03:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gulidjan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- CyberDiablo 15:29, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Early Christianity. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jan1naD (talk • contrib) 15:55, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Australian gold rushes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dolphin (t) 01:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ryan Griffen with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ Matthewrbowker Say hi! 04:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Barry Hall. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 04:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eskimo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Crapper, you may be blocked from editing. Connormah (talk) 02:57, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Swaging, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you! -- Lam Kin Keung (talk) 08:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Dane Swan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jenks24 (talk) 02:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 05:27, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Salinity, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

August 2014

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2000 AFL Draft. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Jevansen (talk) 23:48, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 2000 AFL Draft with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster talk 23:48, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to 2000 AFL Draft. ... discospinster talk 23:49, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mary MacKillop have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 01:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Mary MacKillop, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 01:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gertrude of Nivelles have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 00:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:180.95.18.33&oldid=1142808745"