User talk:119.225.41.214

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

July 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to the article Autism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TbhotchTalk C. 05:23, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Olivia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Olivia was changed by 119.225.41.214 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-08-06T01:15:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:15, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Apollo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Apollo was changed by 119.225.41.214 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-08-16T02:50:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Apollo. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 02:51, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jaguar. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. L Kensington (talkcontribs) 02:53, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Apollo. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. L Kensington (talkcontribs) 02:58, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. JNW (talk) 02:45, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Venus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. WookieInHeat (talk) 03:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

October 2010

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Passive stretching, you may be blocked from editing.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Passive stretching. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Thatguyflint Talk to me! 22:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to United Kingdom general election, 1830 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 01:46, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Masada has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 23:39, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pig Latin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

The recent edit you made to Pig Latin constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Diannaa (Talk) 04:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jelly Roll Morton, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 03:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jelly Roll Morton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kiwi128 (talk) 03:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jelly Roll Morton, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 03:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pig Latin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Geoff Who, me? 23:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Pig Latin constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Geoff Who, me? 23:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Professional, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pig Latin with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NellieBly (talk) 00:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Iron ore, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

May 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sport, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jizz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Moustache with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 23:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2010 FIFA World Cup, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. I should report you since you've been vandalizing articles for a month now, but enough time has passed since the last action that there's no way of knowing if you are the same user or not. Other editors may not be so generous.

July 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chinese garden, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Subalpine zone. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Subalpine zone. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Marek.69 talk 23:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Maize, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Maize was changed by 119.225.41.214 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955268 on 2011-07-21T05:37:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Māori culture, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Māori culture with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 05:13, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 06:51, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ancient Greek architecture, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lauren Mitchell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ancient Greek architecture, you may be blocked from editing. JimVC3 (talk) 23:01, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ancient Greek architecture, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JimVC3 (talk) 23:06, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Calmer Waters 02:23, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2011

[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Paris, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:43, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 00:06, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to William McKinley, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to William McKinley with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Somalian cuisine, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 02:02, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Stem cell controversy. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 03:41, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sydney Harbour Bridge with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 23:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sydney Harbour Bridge with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 23:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - gadfium 08:02, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Clarkcj12. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Beard, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Clarkcj12 (talk) 01:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Seaphoto. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Kakadu National Park, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SeaphotoTalk 02:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  gadfium 03:03, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Padenton. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Masada College— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ― Padenton|   22:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to David Grossman— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 23:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Men's high jump world record progression has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Men's high jump world record progression. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:35, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Men's high jump world record progression, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 04:40, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Men's high jump world record progression. Jim1138 (talk) 04:42, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]