User talk:1.129.97.66

August 2015

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Rob Dyrdek's Fantasy Factory because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 01:27, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jamie Soward has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jamie Soward was changed by 1.129.97.66 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955572 on 2016-06-08T04:08:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jamie Soward with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nick Kyrgios. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 06:41, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Floogals have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alex Cohn (talk) 08:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jamie Soward. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jamie Soward was changed by 1.129.97.66 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962219 on 2017-01-22T08:24:08+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rob Dyrdek's Fantasy Factory, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 08:38, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ransom theory of atonement, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bill Bourne. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bill Bourne was changed by 1.129.97.66 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864633 on 2017-03-05T01:22:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Widr (talk) 01:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Banned

I Have Been Blocked By User:Widr, And I Don't Wanna Be Blocked! :(

This Isn't Even Very Good! :(

I Need To Have A Good Reason! :(

I Want To Be Here To Build An Encyclopedia... :(

I Don't Really Wanna Let Anyone To Block Me! >:(

Hello! Hello, admins! Please unblock me! I did not receive any warning, notification or opportunity to discuss Shellwood's concern prior to my banning and I am not a vandal. Shellwood does not allow users to e-mail him and I cannot post on Shellwood's user talk page or any admin page to discuss this! 1.129.97.66 (talk) 01:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Still Banned

I haven't heard anything about why I was banned, how long I will be banned or whether there has been any review progress. 1.129.97.66 (talk) 01:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Getting Unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1.129.97.66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm So Sorry! 1.129.97.66 (talk) 01:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The block will expire in a month. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 02:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2017

Hello, I'm Aurora2698. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Concord, New South Wales— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Aurora (talk | contribs) 13:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

---