User:WorldTraveller101/RfA-Standards

My RfA Standards

Criterion/Subject	Things that will influence me to oppose.	Things that will influence me to vote neutral, or help me oppose/support.	Things that will influence me to support.
Overall Edit Count	The editor has less than 5000 edits.	The editor has between 5000 and 7500 edits.	The editor has 7500 or more edits.
Mainspace Edit Count	The editor has less than 500 edits.	The editor has between 500 and 800.	The editor has 1000+ edits to the Mainspace.
Edit summaries	The editor uses edit summaries less than 80% of the time.	The editor uses edit summaries 80-95% of the time.	The editor uses edit summaries more than 95% of the time.
CSD Work	The editor tags articles incorrectly for CSD.	The editor isn't interested in CSD work.	The editor tags articles for CSD per policy.
Experience	The editor has been actively editing for less than 3 months.	The editor has been actively editing for 3-6 months.	The editor has been actively editing for more than 6 months.
Blocks and bans	The editor was blocked less than 6 months ago.	The editor was blocked more than 6 months ago.	The editor was never blocked or was blocked more than 1 year ago.
Civility	The editor has a track record of being uncivil.	The editor is usually civil but can break when under pressure.	The editor is able to work well under pressure, and reacts civilly during disputes.
Response to questions	The editor answers questions uncivilly and interprets policy incorrectly. Or they answer using "cut and paste" policy. Or if they just plain blatantly lie.	The editor answers questions in a way that shows that they don't fully understand the policy, but do get the basics.	The editor answers questions politely and according to policy, but also tells how they interpret the policies and how they would use them.
Response to Oppositions at RfA	The editor responds to opposes in an attacking manner.	The editor responds to almost every oppose.	The editor responds to opposes in a civil manner.
How does the editor view adminship?	The editor views adminship as power, or a status symbol.	The editor views adminship as a tool maintenance but also sees it as a way to "lead" other users.	The editor views adminship as helping with maintenance.
Admin-coaching	The editor was not admin coached.	The editor was admin coached after an unsuccessful RFA.	The editor was admin coached.
WikiProject diversity	The editor helps out with only a few topics or WikiProjects.	The editor helps out in various areas of the Wikipedia space, but usually sticks to one topic, or WikiProject.	The editor helps out in a wide range of topics and in various parts of Wikipedia.
XFD Work	The editor has closed XFDs inappropriately, and doesn't seem to have improved.	The editor doesn't close XFDs.	The editor has good knowledge of how to close XFDs and has closed them correctly.
BLP	The editor does not think that it is necessary to make sure that BLPs are 100% correct and verified, and has possibly closed BLP AFDs as such.	The editor holds no opinion on the way BLPs are treated.	The editor views BLPs as needing to be 100% correct and verified, and their edits concur with these views. If the editor views BLP AFDs as default to delete when no consensus, it will also influence me to support.

About My Standards

Coming soon.

Current RFAs

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report No RfXs since 00:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online