The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
What was up with this edit? If you're going to make test edits in my user-space, please clean up after yourself. Thanks,--cj | talk 09:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, I needed someone to test out my award on, and I noticed you come from Australia (I do too) and I haven't met many Australian people yet (although there are many). --Spebi[talk] 08:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
I didn't vandalize the article. You made personal attacks by falsely claiming I did. SakotGrimshine 11:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: Ad banners
I know you probably get a heap of these but... I think your ad banners are really great :) Keep up the good work, --Spebi 11:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Actually I mostly just get requests for new ones :) Thanks! – Qxz 11:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Indenting
I believe how to indent text is a matter of personal preference. Is there some help page that says otherwise which I missed? Anyway, it's so engrained now, it's probably a hard habit to quit. - Mgm|(talk) 08:00, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
You don't have to apologize. Just sayign it's probably better to cite a help page to convince people. - Mgm|(talk) 08:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Editor review
I reviewed you. YechielMan 01:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you note
Thanks for reminding me about those Andy Griffiths articles.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Majorly's RfB
Hey Spebi, thanks for your strong support in my RfB. Sadly, it didn't pass, but I appreciate the support, and I do intend to run again eventually. Happy editing! Majorly(o rly?) 03:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you changed the infobox image on Habbo Hotel. Please do not make changes like that without first discussing it on the talk page. Your edit has been reverted. Thank you, --Spebi 00:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
If you check the edit log, you will find the edit in question was made by a different user. Please don't post accusations like that without first checking it at the edit history - Cloudz679 00:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Re:Chaser Episodes Comment Boxes
The boxes are for comments on that episode. I have done an example in Season 1, Episode 26. It's pretty much just for information and facts on that episode. Most of theese are from the DVD commentary track, but they don't have to be. For example in the episode where Chris wants goes on Sunrise and swears..etc. I great bit of information on this episode would be about the spread of the clip on the internet and how the got more viewers in the next episode becuase of it.
And please feel free to add to the very incomplete guide. For example in the new episodes i know there are stuff missing from the first and third episode. Such as the Qantas still 61% Australian bit.
IAmTheCoinMan 07:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
re:The images on your user/usertalk page (penguins + censored image)
Out of plain curiosity, did you know that your user and user talk page are violating WP:UP#Images_on_user_pages? --Spebi 02:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
The penguins from Madagascar, and the censored image behind the Wikipedia logo (hence the name "The images on your user/usertalk page (penguins + censored image"). I quote:
What can I not have on my user page?
Please do not include non-free images (images uploaded to Wikipedia without the permission of the copyright owner, or under licenses that do not permit commercial use) on your user page or on any subpage thereof (this is official policy and the usual wide user page latitude does not apply, see Wikipedia:Fair use criteria for details). Non-free images found on a user page (including user talk pages) may be removed (preferably by replacing it with a link to the image) from that page without warning (and, if not used in a Wikipedia article, deleted entirely).
Are you trying to make personal attacks on this user? 03:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
No, I am not trying to make a personal attack. I was browsing by your talk/user page and saw the images. In future, I advise you not to make false accusations of personal attacks. --Spebi 03:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
I apologise, I did not realise the image said "featured", and not "censored". But as for the penguin image, please explain? --Spebi 03:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Please stop trying to shift the blame on other uses. They too are using the image aswell as you are, but I am not in a position to enter more than one discussion such as this at a time. Tell me, what exactly is the penguin image ment to represent? --Spebi 03:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
The penguin image is free. – Chacor 03:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
.... 03:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Meaning, as it's licensed under GNU LGPL, you can use it on your userpage without problems. It's not a fair-use image. – Chacor 03:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
This is not helpful Spebi. You were not assuming good faith to other editors. 68.111.92.229 04:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
I apologise, I withdraw my comments. --Spebi 04:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
This is unacceptable. Next time you make comments similar to those considered bad-faith, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 68.111.92.229 04:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
IP: you CANNOT make such warnings. People are NOT blocked for "comments similar to those considered bad-faith". Do not make policy up. And Spebi might be interested to know that ZERO has a history of warning users for things that aren't really blockable for. WP:RFCU needed maybe. – Chacor 09:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
My Other Accounts
Those are accounts I created earlier in my wikipedia days, ardo111 was and still is what name I prefer to use for all online related affairs, so I made that account. I came back a while later, and had forgotten that I had made the account and made ardoh. Then I made ardo191 after again forgetting that I had made these accounts. This was over the course of maybe.. 6 months.. So after getting about 500 edits on wikipedia with ardo191 I wondered what accounts were using those names, looked them up, and tried some of my frequent passwords, and they worked. So I just signed my main account page Ard0 (Talk - Contribs) and left them. I don't use those currently; I have in the past, obviously why I created them. Ard0 (Talk - Contribs) 16:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Warning
I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. --kai{talk/contributions} 07:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Please do not post such comments to users who have not done such a thing. I advise you in future to read through the list of warnings to find the appropriate template for the situation. –Spebi 07:38, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
[ Following unsigned message left on Spebi's talk page on 21:40, 30 April 2007 ]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
Please check your facts before warning other users about vandalism. –Spebi 10:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Please do not post such comments to users who have not done such a thing. I advise you in future to read through the list of warnings to find the appropriate template for the situation.--kai{talk/contributions} 10:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: Regarding the "HHL redirects here, see HHL (disambiguation)" notice on Habbo Hotel
I've been working through Category:Unassessed rail transport articles lately and found the HHL redirect when I assessed Haverhill (Amtrak station). Looking at the HHL page history, the redirect was originally created on March 8 referring to something called "Habbo Hockey League". My practice in adding the station code disambiguations has been to leave redirects in place and create disambiguation pages at the appropriate "(disambiguation)" location and let other editors decide to do the page moves. This situation is one where we might want to reconsider the destination for HHL and move HHL (disambiguation) to HHL, especially since a quick search for "Hockey" within the Habbo Hotel article turns up zero hits. Slambo(Speak) 10:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: Vandalism Warning
The vandalism in which you were referring to when sending me a message was not done by me. Check the edit history before accusing people of doing things they did not do. Regards. PMBO.
Archive ends here
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
Gee, thanks... for a papyrus plant... :) It nows earns a spot on my userpage :) –Spebi 09:39, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
RE: Email userbox
Thank you for your concern, but the email listed there is one I have server-level control over. The possibility for spam is very minimal in my case. But, thank you for your concern. Review MeCASCADIAHowl/Trail 13:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
I added the functionality you requested on the computer reference page. Enjoy! —Mitaphane?|! 00:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
It hasn't seemed to work... thank you for trying anyway :) ~Spebi 00:58, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
It should be working now. —Mitaphane?|! 01:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Ahh, thank you again! Very much appreciated. ~Spebi 01:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Spebirabbits.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:T002-019.JPG. The copy called Image:T002-019.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:32, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Acer Arena
No, in fact I tranlated the whole article to Spanish, why the question?? Tempere 08:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Because it has happened to me in the past; IP address users translating a whole English article into a different language to put on a different Wikipedia, only using a simple language translator online. My apologies. ~Spebi 01:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Nice to talk to you again
How are you? You look great with your edits :D Extranettalk 03:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
No problem, I just came across it and thought that its wierd because it linked to my logs, etc. Extranettalk 08:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Cradle of Filth - Thanks!!!
Thanks SO much for sorting out the references. It's so weird, because I've been putting it off for weeks but I was actually thinking about doing it today. Nobody ever makes useful contributions to that page. You've totally made my day. Cheers! Cardinal Wurzel 10:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Seven have won the 11 weeks of official ratings. The seven weeks as outlined in the channel nine article is an outdated fact. The line may as well be edited to say "seven is leading the year to date" unless you'd like to update the article week by week. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.168.11.47 (talk) 10:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC).
We will change it back to 11 weeks then. ~Spebi 21:30, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk page layout
Yeah sure, it was just something i put together. I might eventually make my userpage/talkpage link together better later on. Just copy the code from the top of the page. Chris_huhtalk 09:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for responding to my question on the Wikipedia:Help_desk#New_template. Just to be clear, it is OK to not only make a new template, but also begin posting it on the talk pages of articles? Our template would indicate that our task force is working on the article. I've seen other people talk about posting information about new templates on the Village Pump before using them. But maybe that is just for publicity purposes, and not because they have to. Thanks for your help!!!--Mackabean 22:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
I think you do need to discuss at the village pump about cleanup templates, and templates that are displayed on countless amounts of articles. You will have to ask someone else about which templates need to be discussed at the village pump first, because I am not entirely sure. But I also know that creating a template in your userspace (as a subpage) is free for you to do anytime (e.g. {{User:Spebi/Template}}). ~Spebi 23:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, dear Spebi! :)
Hi, dear Spebi! :) that was a nice surprise, sweetie - when I saw the orange bar, I thought "oh no - someone else complaining about his a7'ed article?" ;) But no, it was your nice message, and you gifted me a smile, so it's only fair I gift one back to you! It's great to talk to you at last! Love, Phaedriel - 08:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
I never forget a name when I cross paths with someone, and I've seen you around, Aussie ;) Phaedriel - 08:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
User talk page vandalism
Thanks for the revert. I totally missed that. I have now blocked the user indefinitely, since I know for a fact, he's Molag Bal (talk·contribs), a moronic sockpuppeteer (lol). Nishkid64 (talk) 21:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Premature archiving of Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
You appear to have archived this discussion, while it was still on-going. Please fix that. (and note that I have not clicked "save page" to submit this comment!) Andy Mabbett 15:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
There seems to be many discussion topics from March all mixed up. If the page had had its newer discussions posted to the bottom of the page, this may have made my job easier. I apologise for my actions.
I noticed that you posted my mistake on the talk page. Why did you use the the {{userlinks}} template? It makes me look like I have vandalised the page (showing the block buttons and all) which is not what I have done. I have archived –Sebi ~ 21:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
And what do you mean you have not clicked "save page"? –Sebi ~ 08:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Had I wanted to say you were a vandal, I would have done so, and used {{vandal}}. I mean, I did not "click on the save page button"; so did not agree to your supposed terms of use. Andy Mabbett 14:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
re: Your WP links
Please, borrow away, I'm glad someone else finds them useful :) No need to credit me if it clutters your page up! Take care, Riana⁂ 11:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Re. Quote
Hehe thanks. I am honored to have provided a nice quote. :-) Best regards, Húsönd 13:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Category:User es-0
I have speedy deleted a category you created, Category:User es-0, as recreation of previously deleted content. Please see this UCFD. Thanks for understanding! VegaDark (talk) 01:54, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank You!
Thank you for your support of my RFA. ***Clamster 16:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
help desk post
Thank you for filling in my specificity gaps. I didn't mean to delete your post and have restored it. —WAvegetarian(talk) 08:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Recent Message
Hi, I'm sorry you just left a message on my page accusing me of vandalism? Could you please elaborate on this? From what I can tell I was actually fixing vandalism... Jpk82 10:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
KSE Link...
Oh hello Spebi, I have received your message about the link removal. I understand. I recently went through KSE's offical myspace and seen the link below the band info and I was thinking, "Why not add it to Wikipedia? Official Fan Club, Not really a fan site." Oh well, they can just look through their MySpace for the link.
Dear Spebi, I've spent several hours thinking about something to say to you that could accurately describe the joy your wonderful, beautiful gift gave to me... only to find out, sometimes it's best not to speak too much, and cherish a beautiful moment while it lasts. A moment like the one you've gifted me; one that will stick with me, and which shall draw a fond smile on my face every time I see your friendly virtual face.
It is only fair that I correspond to such kindness with a special token of the friendship that we now share. Only a few times I've gifted this, when for one reason or another I find myself specially moved, and let me tell you, sweetie, that you have moved me no end. Here's to a new, wonderful friend :) Haa, dear Spebi! :) Love, you, Phaedriel - 05:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Psst! a secret between me and you - I had the same idea about an opening card last year for my RfA thanks message ;) But I like yours better! xxx
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
My dear Spebi
Sweetie, after a terrible day of sock hunting and mediation stuff, I've decided I'm far too tired to reply to you the way someone as special as you deserves. I'll hold my response for tomorrow, and you'll understand if I rather do it by email - some things are better said privately. I will tell you, thank you for being so special, and above all, for being so sweet. Talk to you tomorrow, my friend :) Love, Phaedriel - 08:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
No problem. The raids were perpetrated by Encyclopedia Dramatica (I would show you the link, but the entire site has been whitelisted). There are no verifiable or reliable sources for this. The many IP vandals (who come off of sites like 4Chan and 7Chan to engage the editors for spite) who have edited it want it included to make a statement. Not that I do not want it included, but I see no way that it could be added using a reliable (and credible) source. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
No prob, let me know if you have any other questions and etc. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
No need to apologise for being bold, if anything else is needed people can raise the issues again. Thanks for archiving! Cheers, Merzul 23:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Honestly, I have to disagree. Help:Archiving_a_talk_page says, "If possible it is better to archive talk pages during a lull in the discussion, as it is best to avoid archiving in the midst of an active discussion so that the full context of the discussion is together," and "you should leave current, ongoing discussions on the existing talk page." Archiving active discussions on a talk page is not helpful, and may force people to either move back some sections from the archive (as Merzul himself already did for one section,) or they may just undo the archiving entirely. Archiving a talk page for an article that is currently a featured article (as Atheism currently is) is the opposite of waiting for a "lull in the discussion." Many of the sections you had archived had received new comments just hours earlier. Next time I would recommend archiving only the conversations that appear to have stopped, and leave the ones that are currently active. Thanks. -- HiEv 00:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
I apologise for my mistake. Long talk pages trigger the message at the top of the editing screen, and I do know how having a long talk page filled with old discussions can affect users viewing the page. I decided to archive, and the previous time I archived the page I received no comments on wrongly archiving active discussions, so I went ahead and archived. I hope you see this from my side and realise that I did not intend to archive active discussions, and my only intention was to archive and remove lagginess from the talk page. Thanks, –Sebi ~ 01:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Actually, you have received a comment for wrongly archiving active discussions before, as seen above in Premature archiving of Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. When you archive talk pages just be more careful about leaving active discussions and only archive the ones that are in a lull. Alternately, you could archive an active discussion and refactor it if you think it's gotten too long and complex to follow. I wasn't suggesting you did anything wrong on purpose, I'm just letting you know you need to be more careful in the future, especially when making large changes to pages. -- HiEv 03:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
RE: Orange bar
Thanks for your message. Etalk 10:41, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Signature
Can you choose what you want to appear as your signature? Do I have to become a member to have one?
Thanks
Australia Ad
Hi, I saw your Australia ad for that WikiProject. However, the ad encompasses the seal, which is under copyright. Because, of this fact, I am going to make a new banner for this project. Miranda 23:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Re: Chaser's War comment
I was the one who edited my comment on the Chaser’s War talk page, to add more relevant info. I was using this computer and I forgot to login. I am aware of the policies, but the revision to the comment wasn't supposed to be malicious. My apologies. Chewbacca1010 03:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
My RfA :)
Thank you, Sebi, for commenting on my RfA, which closed successfully with a tally of 76/0/1! I hope I will meet your expectations, and be sure I will continue trying to be a good editor as well as a good administrator :) If I may be of any assistance to you in the future (or if you see me commit some grievous error :), please drop me a line on my Talk page.
Again, thank you, and happy editing! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
help creating content in my page
i want to know how to create the content in my page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.53.92.72 (talk • contribs).
i have problem creating content in my page.help me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pachx (talk • contribs).
June 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Habbo Hotel. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kai 06:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't believe I have owned the article in anyway – I have been contributing to the discussion on the talk page, and reverting edits that were silly. I don't believe that sort of behaviour is classed as owning the article. Please rethink about your actions in future. Regards, –Sebi ~ 11:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Hi Spebi, Thank you for your comments at my RfA. Let me know if I can help you and feel free to let me know if I mess up anywhere. Cheers. Shyamal 03:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Editor review
I reviewed you. Please feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or comments. --wpktsfs 06:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you...
...very much for you support and generous comments at my RFA. After that vote of confidence, I guess I'll have to cancel the wild blocking rampage I had planned and just go help with the backlogs :).--Kubigula(talk) 02:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Reply from David Kendall
Thank you, Spebi.
I'll read the policies and guidelines. Meanwhile, I posted some suggestions on the "talk page" for Economic Democracy that I hope will be appropriate and useful. I guess I won't know until I read the policies and guidelines.
One question I have in advance, however. I notice most all of the other writers for Wikipedia tend to use abstract nick names. Is anonymity a preference or a necessity? Should I change my "name"?
Hi again, David. Anonymity is definitely a preference at Wikipedia. Many users tend to choose a username that they can edit under without people knowing who they are in real life. I, myself chose "Spebi" as it was a nickname a friend had given me, even though it is quite similar to my real life name.
If you are concerned about your username revealing your real life self to others online, it is possible to change your username from your current username to an online alias, which is entirely up to you, as long as it follows the username policy. This process is called "renaming a user" and "usurping a user" to a different user name. Renaming is renaming your user account (keeping contributions, everything else) to a user account that is currently non-existent. Usurpation is renaming your user account to an already existing account (as long as the target account gives consent).
After reading both my messages, you will probably think that Wikipedia is governed by alot of policies and guidelines, and those who violate will be blocked from editing. It is quite easy to follow the policies and guidelines, and there aren't that many of them. And if you do happen to break a policy or a guideline, Wikipedia will never block you from reading or simply viewing Wikipedia.
As per usual, if you do require any future assistance, don't hesitate to contact me again, and I will respond.
Hi again Betacommand. My other message to you got archived, and I doubt you will see it again. I'm writing to you to confirm if you are still working on the bot code for SpebiBot. The substing task has been approved, and the RfA tally task has not yet been approved. Thanks, +spebi~ 07:14, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
yeah Im working on the subst bot, but the RFA function im not sure how to do that. Betacommand(talk • contribs • Bot) 15:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Tangotango gave me the code, although it is in PHP. Thanks again, +spebi~ 06:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Im still working on it, Ive run into a few issues that im ironing out. Betacommand(talk • contribs • Bot) 02:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Re: Query
Hello Spebi, I don't have any plans to add any new features to the RFA Analysis bot, so please feel free to create a bot to update the tally on the individual pages. Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 08:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Certainly, the code is now available on the Toolserver. Note that RFABot (internal name for Tangobot) is not written in Python, but in PHP. (Don't laugh :P) But it does use pywikipedia via a PHP-to-Python bridge to write to the wiki. Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 11:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Seb26. Thank you for your support and kind words in my RfA, which passed with 95 support, 1 oppose, and 1 neutral !votes. It means a lot to me to have your individual support and the collective support of so many others. I truly will strive to carry myself at a level representing the trust bestowed in me as I use the mop to address the never-ending drips of discontent in need of caretaker assistance.
Thank you for your guidance on my Wikipedia Editor Review, I want to take your advice, I'm sure it will help me a lot, thanks again. --♫Twinkler4♫(Talk to me!) 23:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Sunrise
Dude you have sent me a message asking me not to remove part of the 'sunrise' page. i was removing the part of the co-anchors about Lisa Wilkinson as she is now at rival 'today'. Also the fact that Samantha Arymatage is the new co-host doesnty need to be referneced as it is common knowledge. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.166.231.72 (talk • contribs).
It is not common knowledge. Millions of people read Wikipedia every single day, and probably more than 3 quarters of those millions have not heard of Sunrise, let alone Samantha Armytage. Do not remove it again. It is not harming anyone by being there – infact it is doing good for the encyclopedia. Sebi[talk] 11:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Since there's a track listing, the section can be named 'Enhnced CD section/portion" Socby19 23:16, 1 July 2007 (UTC)SocBy19
Thanks!
Thanks for the Barnstar. Peace. Spartan-James 15:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Thank you for participating in my RfA. It was successful, and I am now, may God have mercy on us all, an administrator. Look at all the new buttons! I had heard about 'protect,' 'block user,' and 'delete,' but no one told me about 'kill,' 'eject,' and 'purée.' I appreciate the trust the community has in me, and I'll try hard not to delete the main page or block Jimbo. -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Re:Peer review
I posted my comment on the peer review page. Thanks. Hydrogen Iodide 06:28, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Pictures
Can you tell me how to upload a picture into an article?
Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skibofilms (talk • contribs).
Rudeness
Is it just me, or did you completely revert my post on the habbo hotel talk page? I really don't know how that is justifiable as "experimentation", I just wanted to point out that anyone who thinks they don't exist should go look at it when the new raids occur on the 7th and the 12th. Your attitude on this whole subject is that of a nazi denying the holocaust. Please, please just tell me what I did to justify you taking that down so I don't put it back up in spite of you. Kernel5 16:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
I did not find it offensive, just annoying that you reverted it. I have seen nearly all of the trolling taking place, and I tried to stay away from that. I didn't suggest that anyone put the first raids on the page, I just mentioned that a second and third raid is up and coming. I would also like to ask you to witness, first-hand, these raids, so that you can better understand what happened. The numerous pictures of the first ones should have been proof enough, but apparently not. Kernel5 06:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Okay, that much I'm clear with, it just seems that everyone who doesn't want it up there says that. There are plenty of pages out there that don't cite sources at all, and yet they are not removed from wikipedia. IMO I think someone has it out for ED and the raids, but that hasn't really mattered much for the past few months.
Also, thanks for putting that article back up.
Guidance, Suggestions?
Hello again, Spebi:
My recent edits to the Ethanol fuel article seem to be objectionable to at least one individual. I was hoping you might take a look, and provide a critique and/or suggestions for how I can improve. When you have time, please see the "Land Use", "Alternatives", and "Economics" sections of this article, along with the bottom of the discussion page for that article.
I'm not asking you to back or support any views I've presented. Rather, I hope you will let me know if my edits are appropriate and/or useful, according to Wikipedia guidelines and policies. I don't know whether or not "Johnfos" is a Wikipedia administrator. But I don't want to find myself butting heads with someone who might "block" me from any further editing. My general impression is that Johnfos will very likely object to nearly any content in his article that challenges the production of ethanol fuel.
Please let me know if I'm out of line, so I can adjust accordingly. Thanks again for your help.
Technically, the roots of Habbo Hotel are from both Hotelli Kultakala and Mobiles Disco and Hotelli Kultakala is Finnish Translation for Goldfish Hotel. Hotelli Kultakala was the basic concept of Habbo Hotel. Also in some hotels users call Tracks "TrakPaks". Thank you for your time in reviewing this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cheese223 (talk • contribs).
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
If it would effect you that greatly, I'll look into it. But I really don't want to go through the hassle (that's the impression I get anyway) of renaming. Maybe one day... G1ggyTalk/Contribs 00:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
As someone who just changed through WP:USURP, it's not that big of a deal --Laugh! 00:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, I'm now considering changing to G just so I can make WP:SLG. G1ggyTalk/Contribs 03:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my recent RfA. However, it was unsuccessful. I am in no way disheartened, and I will hopefully succeed in a month or two. If you have any further suggestions or comments, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page, and I will be happy to respond. Matt/TheFearow(Talk)(Contribs)(Bot) 02:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Help?
Hi again, Spebi,
Now it seems I've done something BAD wrong. Please check the Jack Rasmus article, and provide some guidance if you would. Thank you. Sorry if I've made a mess. I'll do whatever is necessary to correct the error.
The problems with the Jack Rasmus article is that it is most likely an embarrassment to Jack Rasmus, which I never intended. I have removed all text that I originally posted, and humbly request that the page itself be deleted. I apologize for posting the thing in the first place, and will write a formal letter of apology to Mr. Rasmus. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by David Kendall (talk • contribs).
Euthanasia: First Sentence
Hey Spebi --
I noticed you've been editing the euthanasia article a bit lately. If you're feeling ambitious, I'd really appreciate your opinion on the first sentence of that article.
Time was, the sentence made sense, but a Crusader went and changed all that. Now it's a jumble of poor grammar, semicolons, and parentheses.
I gave up, since the topic is too controversial for my taste, and I had trouble satisfying some of the more passionate editors.
If you get the chance to check out the talk page, familiarize yourself with the debate, and throw in your 2c it would be much appreciated.
Thanks, Kangaru99 23:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
fyi. this was the version i wanted:
Euthanasia (from Greek: ευθανασία -ευ, eu, "good", θάνατος, thanatos, "death") is the practice of terminating the life of a terminally illperson or animal in a painless or minimally painful way, for the purpose of limiting suffering.
and this is the current incarnation:
Euthanasia (from Greek: ευθανασία -ευ, eu, "good", θάνατος, thanatos, "death") is the practice of terminating the life of a person or animal with an incurable disease, intolerable suffering, or a possibly undignified death in a passive manner (i.e. removing a feeding tube or turning off respirators) for the purpose of limiting suffering, not to be confused with physician assisted suicide, which takes active means to end suffering (i.e. prescribing a lethal dose of morphine).
Thanks for your suggestions. I've taken both into account & I think the result is a better introductory sentence. Now we'll see if it's reverted, as it has been in the past. If I remember correctly, an editor felt that "terminally ill" was not a neutral phrase. Things went downhill from there. Ideally there won't be any objections this time -- if there are, I hope we can make all parties happy without compromising quality and coherence. Thanks again for your help. --Kangaru99 22:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Re....ply ;)
Does that mean I'll get a reply soon, my Aussie? ;) Phaedriel - 09:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Your recent bot approvals request has been speedily approved. Please see the request page for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in this log. --ST47Talk 14:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Question
You are voted for the Hexer - but you say oppose? Is this correct? Maybe I understand it not good enough... Marcus Cyron 12:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
RE: Guns N' Roses
Hi Spebi, in British English, 'Guns N' Roses are' is seen as correct and in American English it's 'Guns N' Roses is' (I don't know what is correct in Australian English'. Although I think 'Guns N' Roses is' is correct, it doesn't matter which is in the article but I reverted the edit as the rest of Guns N' Roses' article is written in American English. Neither 'is' nor 'are' are incorrect, but when editing articles it's best not to unnecessarily change it to your preferred style of English. Bucketheader 14:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
DerHexer's RfA
Hello Spebi. Regarding your comment Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/DerHexer, you said "Strongly Oppose" under the Support section. However, from the description that followed, it sounds like you are indeed supporting DerHexer's RfA. I didn't want to correct it myself, but instead wanted to call it to your attention. Thanks, and enjoy the weekend! --HBow3 16:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, it appears someone already called it to your attention, but just as a reminder. --HBow3 16:51, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Oh. That's what I thought at first. I made me laugh. Thanks for the clarification. --HBow3 21:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
AIV report
Sorry- I did not know there was such a big difference between "blocking" and "banning". I as unaware, that banning is only done by ArbCom or Jimbo. I will distinguish between the two from now, thanks for the info; --noclador 23:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
Ah...
Thanks for the help with my userbox, but I'm a female. ~Crowstar~ 23:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Userbox
Hello, I was referring to this userbox that says: "This user believes that mankind cannot progress unless Country Music is eliminated.†" In my previous post, I had also linked to the Wikipedia guidelines for designing userboxes in addition to the POV. HERE is the link to the userbox content guidelines. Thanks. Marycontrary 10:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the smile
Thanks for the smile. It made my day much better. Cheers, -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism warning
But it would depend entirely on the extent of the vandalism. Ryan(talk/contribs) 11:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Daria Petition
Hi. It's not a hoax (I mean the petition for more Daria Episodes, in the Daria article). I started the petition and I think the article is a good way for other people to know about it. what's the matter with keeping it in the article??? And if it doesn't belong to the article itself, why not keep it in the "External Links" section?
cheers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Goyingus (talk • contribs).
Happy Spebi's Day!
Spebi has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Spebi's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Spebi!
My sweet friend, after your incredibly beautiful gift, which left me without words (a feat in you have a gift in! ;) I thought about emailing you, then of messaging you here.... only to realize, you deserve so much more. As time passes and you take more and more steps into my heart, you're becoming a very special friend to me... and this little poem is but a poor reflection of those feelings. Thank you for being there - and for being you. Enjoy your special Day, dear Spebi! :) Love, Phaedriel - 00:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for my first ever barnstar! I didn't ever see myself getting one of those! :D I'll move that to my userpage. :D --Dreaded Walrustc 04:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and thanks for fixing my userpage a bit. I've got literally no experience with userpage formatting. :) --Dreaded Walrustc 14:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Canberra
it may be a FA, but someone has introduced new claims after it was classed as a FA. as you know every claim must be citated! as for schools, I would like a citation for that, because I know in urban NSW, schools are located near places of density rather than open space to maximise number of students in catchment area. If this policy is different in ACT as the article claims then it should be backed up. regards Michellecrisp 07:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your response, I added those fact tags as information that stood out as a claim, a FA must have have a very high standard. in no way does it mean the whole article is unreliable or even that statement (if it was clearly unreliable I would remove it first go) I'd rather give people a chance to citate a claim before removing it. I've had disagreements before where people didn't like me removing stuff without consultation. Michellecrisp 07:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Are you a sysop? Eh....
You have been permanently blocked from bad jokes as a result of your disruptive humour. You are free to make constructive jokes after the block has expired. Thank you. GiggyUCP 22:07, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, couldn't find you on the admin list. I'll just have to unblock myself (even though I'm not on the list either) :P GiggyUCP 22:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Nope, not an admin. Sebi[talk] 22:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Well then two things: 1) When can I nominate you? 2) Stop blocking me :P GiggyUCP 23:32, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Have you watchlisted my talk pages? Sheesh... :P GiggyUCP 00:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Woot! Fixed the problem. *is embarrassed* GiggyUCP 03:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Guns n roses page
That section is back to normal now, and from now on I'll respect your wishes. However, what I typed there (On July 18, 2007 an alternate mix of "Madagascar" leaked on the internet. There's much speculation as to whether it is official or a fan made mix.) is true, it did happen, a new mix did leak. Whether or not the mix was fan made or official, I felt that posting this was valid since it had to do with the forthcoming news on Chinese Democracy. So I say once again, I'll respect your wishes and stop posting that tidbit of info, but I question, if this site's purpose is to allow people to update society on new information about celebrities, authors, artists, bands, and basically the world, then how is my line of information not valid, it isn't false? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.44.63.78 (talk • contribs).
Daria Petition.
Ok... I Sometimes think it's better to stop following the "rules" and just do whatever is best (in this case if not best, it's completely "harmless"), but I guess Wikipedia as a community do not share this opinion, and I respect that. Thanks for clearing things up anyway, cheers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Goyingus (talk • contribs).
Harry potter vandalism
hey i wasn't vandalizing, i was deleting it because the book has not been officially released and there were many spoilers there —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thecrimson (talk • contribs).
ok im sorry
i wont do it again
im getting it at midnight pacific time so i didnt want to see anything
hope its good! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thecrimson (talk • contribs).
I see I did not fully RV the vandalism of this page, and to be honest looking over the history based on your reverts and edits I fear it's still not clean as it still grows in size every time. You may want to take a closer look at this article. Slysplace | talk 00:40, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
My last peer review took a month! Thanks for this :D Hope to see you back soon (if indeed you are on break/retired), from your overly loyal companion, GiggyUCP 08:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
If you retire I'll kill you. :P And you still haven't added my MSN! GiggyUCP 08:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
*sigh* I'll be offline in about 20 minutes (probably, unless mum decides she DOES love me after all and won't wring my neck). So give me yours, nooooooob! GiggyUCP 09:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
*mental note* - You really make my talk page look bad. GiggyUCP 09:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Giggy
Your Strongest oppose was in the support section, so I moved it to the oppose section, but is that really what you meant? --Stephen 1-800-STEVE 10:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm a terrible candidate, it was moved correctly. Right? GiggyUCP 00:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
GAC is a process for determining which articles are good articles per the good article criteria. It's very informal, but you basically stick your article in the appropriate section, and someone comes and reviews it (instructions are all on the page). Ask me if you need any more info. GiggyUCP 22:01, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks hugely...
...for reverting vandalism to my userpage...greatly appreciated :o) Drivenapart 07:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Hi, Spebi, and thanks for your participation in my RfA. I've withdrawn it, and will be writing up an "analysis" of it, which will soon be available at User:Giggy/RfA/Giggy when it's done. Please come around when you get the chance, and give me feedback on how I can improve. Strong oppose if you ever run for it :P Thanks again, GiggyUCP 04:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
In regards to wikilinks
I had always thought it was supposed to be only one link per article, too. But in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) it says "Good places for link duplication are often the first time the term occurs in each article subsection" and that only one link can actually be underlinking in a long article. V-train 05:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
August 2007
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thanks for the experiment - and "hi!". But in future please voice your opinions elsewhere, especially Wikipedia: pages. Cheers! :-)Bennyboyz3000 05:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
False accusation – carry on. Sebi[talk] 05:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Canberra
Thanks for the explanation. I lived in Canberra for 30 years before moving to Sydney 4 years ago, and the reasons I added the information are:
- most people may be unaware that Canberra has produced those players (apart from the Canberra Raiders and Brumbies players)
- the article on Canberra has a mix of history weaved into its sections, and this is important sports history for Canberra
- Canberra is seen by many people outside the ACT as lacking character. Recognition of sporting success is a very good tool for countering this. I was also hoping that others may be inspired to add famous Canberrans to other sections of the article e.g. artists and entertainers, business people
- If the list needs to be shortened then I would suggest sticking to O'Connor, Campese, Hird, Jesaulenko and Bevan.
Just a note, Project assessments (B-class) aren't part of the articlehistory template, and trigger an error.[1][2]SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
A template you created, Template:Archive Box Vista, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Cheers. --MZMcBride 22:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
How have you been?
Hello there Sebi. How have you been mate? Haven't spoken to you lately and I don't really go on WLM anymore, but I'm also busy in real life so I am not really editing much now. I hope I can get back to my old editing rate before I go on my 4 week camp leaving August 27. I'm looking forward to that. Let me know how you're going and what has been happening. Kind regards, — Etalkbots 07:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
— Etalkbots has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Sig
I've replied to the lot of you at my talk page!! :)Pedro | Chat 08:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
For you
The Barnstar of Good Humor
For your laugh out loud comment at my user page I award you this barnstar. Pedro | Chat 08:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
Noob!
GiggyTalk | Review has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Gladly, my friend, but do the people involved with the article know of your devious plans? :) (i.e. Any discussion about the page move anywhere?) ~ Riana ⁂ 08:29, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Not to butt in, but stop editing conflicting me :P GiggyTalk | Review 08:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 11:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks a lot for the Smile. I really appreciate it! Cheers! -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 03:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
I did for a minute there, and I thought to myself "What have I done?", but then I saw the smile :) Cheers -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
I want to insult you, but I don't feel like being a jerk at the moment. Brownstone999 04:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Spebi, we don't know for sure what he meant by that article. Look you may say "dude, just chill out, be cool about it, and don't over-think it. You must have NO LIFE to over-think something so ******* small". Well I just had alot of sugar and what not. Thus I'm hyper and tend to anaylize things a little bit more deeply while I'm hyper. If we contacted Geffen Records, do you think we could get to Axl's publicist? Brownstone999 04:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Archiving
I was wondering if you could tell me how to archive my talk page. Thank you if you can. Skeeker[Talk] 05:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the help. To move them to the archive page do I just copy past select ones onto the other page? Skeeker[Talk] 05:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, now the last thing I need is to add achive 1 to the archivebox template. Skeeker[Talk] 05:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Okay, thank you for all of the help. I will be sur to look to you for any future advise. Skeeker[Talk] 06:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Fact tags
Hi Spebi.
I will add the FACT tags to the John Howard article. I don't want to be the one to delete them (at least not yet), though I see that others have started deleting. I just point out the questionable "facts", and others can deal with it somehow, by rewriting and sourcing the information, or just deleting them. Best wishes, Lester2 05:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello Spebi. I am here to inform you that your userpage or talk page has been conquered by the Australian Cabal. Please don’t panic; there is nothing you can do about it. You are hereby invited to join the Cabal, and help conquer other pages for our cause. See User:Giggy/Australian Cabal for more information. Thank you, have a nice day, and welcome to Australia. GiggyTalk 22:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Nice policy. :-) ~Wikihermit 23:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Excellent... I shall be deleted before I know it :). Jmlk17 07:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Please help out
Hello again Spebi, I am having trouble with a user vandilizing the page for Down III: Over the Under and User:Corrupt toolbox I seem to not be very good at getting attention of administrators, as they always reply back to me when the problem is somehow solved after a very long period of time. I am wondering if you could report User:24.117.147.70 to an administrator because he won't let up the vandilisim, I know it is a shared IP address but something has to be done about it. Thank you. Skeeker[Talk] 23:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
But that is the thing, he is vandilizing because the video he is posting has nothing to deal with the band Down, it is merely a 1980's pop singer singing in a video, therefore it has nothing to deal with the band or album leak. Skeeker[Talk] 04:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
P.S. thank you for offering to help with the layout. ;)Skeeker[Talk] 04:39, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
I reported it to WP:AIV but I'm not sure if anything happened. Skeeker[Talk] 04:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you I reported it to who you recomended. Skeeker[Talk] 04:58, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
I reported it and nothing happened and then he reverted again and said:
(Undid revision 150456211 by Skeeker (talk) I will not be controlled by a CHRISTIAN metallica fan. Fuck off douchebag.)
So now he is really pissing me off and nobody did anything, so please report 24.117.147.70 to somebody for me. Thank you again. Skeeker[Talk] 03:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Howard Start Class
Sorry, I changed it to start again, before I saw your message. The Howard article is very poor, biased. Not based on fact. Not cited. Controversial. It should be start class. I won;t change it again, but I think the mystery committee should review it for such a fantasy article that is not balanced. 58.165.254.80 07:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Oh. It was my handwriting. :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 13:24, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
Please help out... again ;)
Hello, I was wondering if you know how to create a Category page. Because I would very much like to have a the pages and I have no clue how. Skeeker[Talk] 07:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Wow nevermind, I suppose that was a little wierd. They appeared when I typed them in so now I know how. I deleted them when they showed up on here. Skeeker[Talk] 07:29, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Main Menu fix
Thanks, however I believe that we have never met. HarrisonBSpeak! 06:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Usurption
You need to be an "established editor" to be allowed to usurp usernames. A new account isn't allowed to do so. Just fyi. Secretlondon 13:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to help out with that too...I get the feeling I can work on AoE's GA and this towards FL at the same time - it shouldn't be too hard (making tables, finding some refs). Let's get to work (yes, I'll start on this now)! I don't look forward to a full table conversion (having done that before with the list of minor gods in AoM), but I think there's an auto converter - I'll go look. GiggyTalk 04:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm at school...I may be able to get on MSN in an hour and a half. I'm Special:Emailusered you an email address you can get me on if it's urgent. Get to work :P GiggyTalk 04:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Email on its way? Just so I know if I should look out for it... GiggyTalk 04:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
I'll help with the effort. I've left a few "unit types" blank because I'm not sure what you would classify them as. If you could fill that in, that would be great :-). Thanks! ~Wikihermit 19:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey Spebi - I would be delighted to help where I can too; a long-time player of this game, I would love to see this list featured. Cheers -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
I am actually editing the list of Egyptian myth units as we speak. And yes - a general knowledge of AOE is a general knowledge of AOM. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
I would have no problem with taking a screenshot. I will take one later on today. The ones you pointed out were also good. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry - it has been pushed back a bit. I will definitely have time to properly play the game and take some good screenshots today. What exactly would you like pictures of, or what pictures do you tihnk would best compliment the article? -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 21:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
That sounds like a great idea - I might also get a shot ofm a regiment of hoplites or infantry etc. or some myth units.... -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 21:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
/me could get a few screen shots. ~Wikihermit 04:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Please do. Sebi[talk] 04:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Maybe Wikihermit should be the one get them: I just realised I lent my game to a friend a while back. I can get it back at school tomorrow, though, so I will definitely take some tomorrow. I am sorry for the delay. Thanks in advance Wikihermit. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Ok then. Thanks for understanding (btw, the shot used in the article at the moment is quite good) -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
You won't believe it, but I just can't get the screenies - I haven't got the game: friend still has it, i can't seem to get ahold of him etc. etc.. Sorry; I really am. Maybe Wikihermit will be able to get some. Cordially, -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Smile
Lights has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Cheers,Lights 00:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey Sebi...how close are you to considering adminship? —Giggy 08:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Yes, of course. —Giggy 09:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hey, thanks for protecting my user page! Way cool! Dreadstar† 06:36, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
I've been attacked before by vandals I've warned, but it's always so cool to have another editor help defend me from them....gives a nice "family" feeling to this whole thing...oooo, and yes...that was a very creative userbox-attack! I like the one that was going to blank your already blank page...lol..! It's nice to meet you! Dreadstar† 06:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Nice to meet you to! :) And yay, he's calmed down! :) –sebi 09:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
lol..! Yes...the One Wiki to rule them all...how we loves it, and hates vandals...! Hehe..Dreadstar† 06:20, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
BwaHaHaa! I think you win, that last was very very funny...but...then...there are some who call me...Tim...care to purchase a polly parrot? Dreadstar 06:34, August 30, 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, Spebi. Would you kindly please go back and make your vote explicit? From your edit summary and your placement under the "Support" heading, it looks like you are voting in favour, but since there's a fair amount of non-vote discussion in each of the subject headings, and all you did was sign your name, there's some ambiguity there. If you intend to vote in support, please add Support (in boldface) before whatever other comments you make + your signature. If you intend a Neutral or Oppose vote, please remove your comment from the "Support" heading and move it to the appropriate one, as well. Thanks! --Scheinwerfermann 02:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Erm...OK! You're right there's no rule, and you're also right it's common practice. Guess you dislike common practice or something. *shrug* --Scheinwerfermann 17:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Re:Archive
Sorry - I do it on a monthly basis. I know it is annoying, but it helps things to be organised by a set rule, if you will. Dont worry - tomorrow it is all gone :) -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Ceres3's RFA
Hey, no problem. I'm always glad to help in any capacity I can. Useight 06:43, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
User Warns
Yeah, I know, this guy's just being very persistent and I wanted him to see that it was his last warning. In future I'll put it at the bottom. Cheers Ardent†alk∈ 06:58, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Re:IRC
Ok, I am on. Why am I going on IRC? -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much for showing me how to do that! Do you mean monobook.js, or .css, I have a .js, but don't have a .css, so I just wanted to be sure before doing it. Thanks again! Ariel♥Gold 03:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Okie, I added a .css, want to send me a message to test it for me? (pretty please) Ariel♥Gold 03:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Omg that rocks! lol. Jeez now I'm going to have to learn more about .css stuff here to customize other stuff! Thank you so much for telling me how to get rid of that horrid ugly bar! Sheesh, 2+ years, 8k edits, you'd think I'd know these silly little things, wouldn't you? lol. Thanks again! Ariel♥Gold 03:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Ariel's Angel
Ariel's Angel of the Day
For showing me how to get rid of the ugly yellow message bar, and replace it with a pretty purple one! Thank you!
Hee hee, good. I just changed my colors again, I didn't have them bright enough, and happened to use the same color that "visited links" end up being, so it kinda blended in. (Yeah I know, girls are weird about colors, right? lol) So hopefully now it will be more "Shocking" (Used shock pink lol) Ariel♥Gold 03:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
My Spebi
This will surely sound silly, sweetie, but I've hesitated before starteing to type a short thing here, telling you how much I miss you. My fingers shake - I feel so silly! I guess you'll just have to forgive me if I tell you, thank you so much, not just for letting me know you care about me, but for everything you've done for me in the last days, weeks, and months. The wonderful little card you gifted me when I was down, a couple of weeks ago, was an incredibly beacon of light amidst a dark moment. You so deserve an explanation, and I promise, you'll get it soon - but for now, I hope you feel the warmththe incredible virtual hug I'm sending you. Love you, my S. Phaedriel - 04:59, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Response
Hi, I responding to your post on Riana's talk page. Take Care....NeutralHomerT:C 05:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
I appreciate the reverts on the Acorah vandalism on my talk page...much obliged. Jmlk17 07:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks (2)
Thanks for the help. --Sharkface217 06:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikiplate
That is just too cool :) Now, if only you could have like a uneaten bite of mashed potatoes there and cruppled up napkin, make it look like a real plate. Still awesome as it is. Take Care....NeutralHomerT:C 08:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm trying to keep using .svg icons, rather than real-life pictures, and it's a bit hard to find some of these. Sebi[talk] 09:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
I do like the plate idea and it might be something you might think of expanding so that other users could use it for things they have on their "plates" as well. I think you would run out of foods before you run out of WikiProjects, WikiGroups, WikiPortals, and the like...an idea though for ya. Take Care and Have a Good Day...NeutralHomerT:C 10:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Not a problem...and You're Welcome. :) Take Care and Enjoy Your Day...NeutralHomerT:C 10:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For the help you rendered me through WP:HELPDESK. You work what I consider to be the hardest job on Wikipedia. And you do it for free and by choice. That's something. You really deserve this. --Sharkface217 09:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Long overdue. --Sharkface217 09:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
You're quite welcome. --Sharkface217 09:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Is there a reason you deleted my Support comment? [3] Just wanted to check before I reinstated it. ~Eliz81(C) 06:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
I see you've fixed it. Thanks so much! Since you were altering the template above, I figured it was a mistake, but there was a teeny tiny part of me that was worried I'd done something wrong :P ~Eliz81(C) 06:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
LOL... awesome... if more people channeled their anger that way, I think we could finally achieve world peace! :) ~Eliz81(C) 07:00, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
We should totally have a pageant. Miss Wikipedia! And we could establish consensus on who would win, because after all, Wikipedia is not a vote. So what would the events be? Getting an article to FA, followed by swimsuit competition? ~Eliz81(C) 07:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
I'd take a barnstar over a tiara any day! Some of them are quite sparkly too :) ~Eliz81(C) 07:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
2 things
Firstly, I'm once again offering adminship...you'll give in eventually! Secondly, nice work on the AoM list. AD added my MSN, and said that it had copyvio issues - how's that going? DihydrogenMonoxide 02:19, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, AD mentioned copyright. Enjoy the...er...knitting >_<.
I'm sorry, dear Dihydrogen, but I claimed Spebi as my propriety for RfA long, long ago... maybe we can share him? ;) Phaedriel - 20:17, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey, Phaedriel sweetie, send me a email or hidden message on my talk when you get ready to nom Spebi. That way, we can leave in Gig.., oops I mean DM in the dust. --Thε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 23:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Well nothing will be happening any time soon... there are still some areas I'd rather smooth over before accepting any request for adminship... Sebi[talk] 05:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Riana's page
I was thinking about changing it back and just leaving it there, but it would be bad form to get caught in a 3RR with myself. :P — $PЯINGεrαgђ 03:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
I've tried to locate my original source for this image, however haven't had any luck. I'll keep at it so we can attribute the image accordingly. It certainly looks to me like a police evidence photograph. I remember seeing the exact same image used on local tv at the time of their arrests and described as such. -- Longhair\talk 09:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to add further that I think you're doing a terrific job with the Bali Nine article. I provided much of the bulk that makes up the 10 articles on those convicted, and the events surrounding it, but kind of fell out of the loop once the verdicts were delivered. It'd be good to see this article reach Featured Status. If you need any help, feel free to shout out towards my direction. -- Longhair\talk 07:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Sure is close... One glaring problem I see is the entire section titled "Pre-arrest history" being 100% unreferenced. I think you'll find a handful of the existing references could easily back up the claims made there, or failing that, a glance back at the article history from a year or so ago might provide some further external links on the topic. -- Longhair\talk 07:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Thanks very much for your support in my successful RFA. Let me know if I can help you out with anything. And I'll try to get to your editor review in a couple of days. Cheers!!! Flyguy649talkcontribs 20:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Question
Do you think that Real Madrid C.F. article should be a featured one? I worked a lot but it failed the FA.--Hadrianos1990 15:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Template standardisation
No problem, you couldn't have known. And was easy for me to fix so no confusion caused. And yes, I think the same. I took a look and most threads have been to recently active to be archived, yet the page is getting way to big. So yeah, I think we have to archive in "non chronological order" and just archive those threads who is not needed any more. Although they are not many... Should you or I do it? Or should we make up a list of thread headers on the archive page together to see that we agree and then cut and paste the content to them afterwards? --David Göthberg 07:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)— Preceding text originally posted on User talk:Davidgothberg by Davidgothberg (talk⋅contribs) 07:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
I am not sure what you mean, would you amplify your comment? Really, a lot, because I really don't understand. Thanks a whole bunch. (and I assume I should thank you for reverting my edit...). Reply on my talk page if you don't mind, please. User:Pedant 09:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
The extra headers on the sub pages clutter the TOC on the main page, is how I understand that. I hadn't read any discussion on that yet. Thanks for the prompt help and... thank you for reverting my edit as well. User:Pedant 09:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Corey Taylor
Yeah, sorry about the "Corey Taylor being rich thing". Its just that my uncle lives in Des Moines, Iowa and he sez dat Taylor livs in a really rich part of it. But then again i can't prove that so sorry mate. User; Mahoogh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahoogh (talk • contribs) 21:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Powderfinger images
Hey, thanks for uploading some very good images of Powderfinger! When uploading free images, try to upload the highest resolution possible in flickr. I also hope you can upload some more pics to add them in the main article too. I'll try to find some good ones too!! :-) RaNdOm26 10:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I noticed that user in flickr has created a COLOSSAL number of pics, and the best thing is that all are perfect to upload in Commons! Don't say sorry! - your image uploads have been excellent, keep up with the great work. RaNdOm26 10:42, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
The Photographer's Barnstar
You and Random both deserve this award for the outstanding work you put into image searching while I was sleeping, oh so comfortably! Enjoy the award, and use it well! Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 00:34, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Oooh! thanks! :) Sebi[talk] 00:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Daniel is a great designer isn't he? I like your colour scheme too. All the best, -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi
I added that "missing stamp" on your userpage :) I hope you won't be angry that I did. I couldn't find any Australian stamps (which is odd), so I used the ol' Penny Black from the UK....which, by the way, is the "world's first official adhesive postage stamp". Neat, huh?
Again, I hope you don't mind my addition to your userpage and if you do, of course, you are free to revert it...of course, it's your page :) Take Care and Enjoy Your Sunday....NeutralHomerT:C 10:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
No worries and my apologizes :) I have already forgotten you have a userpage....wait, you have a userpage? :) Take Care and I hope you have a good week...NeutralHomerT:C 01:50, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I suggest you ask for advice on the talk page. It looks like it needs breaking into sections and addressing the {{confusing}} tag at the top, for starters. --Scott DavisTalk 23:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Another barnstar >_>
The Australian Barnstar of National Merit
I confer upon you this barnstar for your work in so many aspects of Australia related stuff. I’ve lost count of the number of different areas where your constructive edits have helped out the project - it’s like you’ve had a lifelong interest in every area I’ve worked in, and then some. So, for being one of the best Aussie gnomes around here, I present you with this award. Use it well! Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 22:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Wow!
Three cheers for the most original message I've received in ages! :) (and I already saw your mail, sweetie! - I'll see you at your mailbox!) Lots of love, Phaedriel - 04:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Spebi,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 55 supports, 15 oppose, and 1 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to vote in my nomination. I'm a new admin, so if you have any suggestions feel free to let me know. I would like to give a special shout out to Fang Aili, Phaedriel, and Anonymous Dissident, for their co-nominations. Thank you all!
Thanks for your support! I took the easy way out of thanking everyone by borrowing someone else's design...but know that I sincerely appreciate your support and confidence in me! Your comments were magnificent... Dreadstar† 04:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
By the way, where did you get the nomination pending/short listed thing (here) - I can't see any on the list... Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikihugs
Just a few things... firstly, given that template is in my user space, I would have appreciated being asked rather than just having you change it. Secondly, I already had a delayed subst in the code, which means that the "PAGENAME" variable gets substituted when the template is substituted onto the talk page, and therefore, when it gets archive it still works. Thirdly, I never expect anyone to put it anywhere other than an active talk page, and they would be silly to do otherwise, so sub-pages really isn't a problem. — TimotabTimothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 15:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Gah, sorry if I came across as majorly upset. I know it was meant in good faith. Peace? :) — TimotabTimothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 13:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
The now-traditional RFA thank-spam
Click there to open your card! → → →
Dear Seb26,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on my talk page. Special thanks to WaltonOne and DihydrogenMonoxide for nominating me.
Just wondering if you were aware that even as a page editor, you're allowed to post your support (or opposition) for the FLC for the awards list? If you think it's ready to, then you should head over and vote. --lincalinca 05:14, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:39, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Are we gonna add contextual information to all the selected image pages, or just this one? Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Eek, dunno how I missed that. Probably better if we remove it from selected articles - keep the GA (and up) standard going there...especially since that image was requested in selected images at the FPOC. I'm on MSN, btw. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 05:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
One Rincon Hill peer review (2nd time)
Thanks for reviewing the One Rincon Hill article about two and a half months ago. Since then, I have cleanup and done a lot of referencing work on the article. I have also relisted One Rincon Hill at the peer review department. Perhaps you could review the article again? Thanks. Cheers. Hydrogen Iodide(HI!) 01:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
For the Birthday Committee GregJonesII 09:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Happy birthday! Surely it's RfA time now :P Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 02:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
It was my birthday 3 days ago! :) ~ Sebi[talk] 02:22, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry - I missed it: Happy birthday!... for three days back... :P -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 02:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia has a new administrator!
Thanks, Archive! Thank you for voicing your opinion in my RfA, which passed today with a unanimous 79/0/0 tally. It feels great to be appreciated, and I will try my best to meet everyone's expectations. If you have any advice or tips, feel free to pass them along, as I am sure that I will need them! Cheers,hmwith talk 21:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikiproject Gymnastics
Your edits or discussions show that you may be interested in the new Gymnastics Wikiproject.
Please join and help to start this new wikiproject. We need lots of members and lots of help. Wikiproject Gymnastics also contains the related sports of cheerleading, power tumbling, and trampolining.
About the ref section, you might want to talk to NE2 about it, since I neither endorse addition or removal of that section. —O (说 • 喝) 01:14, 02 October 2007 (GMT)
WOOT!
List of Powderfinger awards - It's got such a wubbable star and everything. :) And thanks for the amazingly original barnstar - I doubt I'll ever see something like that again. Did you give lincalinca one? — Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thanks - it took a lot of time. I'm going to keep making it better. *Dreams of FA* :P. Lol, I can dream... :) -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:49, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Its up for Peer review now. Comments would be appreciated here. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Think we're ready?
I think we are. For Powderfinger discography to go to WP:FLC. I know there are minor issues remaining, but for the most part, these can be resolved over the term of the article being up for flc. If you give the word, I'll nom us (or, you can if you want). Maybe ask diggy. --lincalinca 02:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Re:Vangel
Ah. Silly me. I put an e on the end of it. I shouldn't have. I am loath to have them in the template namespace, I do not loathe them. I'll go fix that. isaid 04:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the question. Just in case you haven't checked it, I've responded. I hope I answered satisfactorily. Happy editing! --Agüeybaná 23:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
SineBot
Why do you not submit to the glorious wonders of Sinebot? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.236.33 (talk) 08:27, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Because I choose not to, is that such a problem? I remember to sign all of my comments, and if I forget to sign one, SineBot will beat me to signing it. He'll probably beat me to signing your comment with {{unsigned}} right now. ~ Sebi[talk] 08:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
What'd you know, the "glorious" edit conflict message. ~ Sebi[talk] 08:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
LOL. That's quite funny. I was trolling his contributions page and came across you. Go figure. --lincalinca 12:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Please double-check the anon's contributions. They're beyond bizarre. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 18:15, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
I wonder who this IP really is... ~ Sebi[talk] 21:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, that's what interested me in him. I saw him post on your (tito's) page and skimmed at him contributions and they were all over the shop. No focal area at all, from what i could see. Almost like he's on drugs while editing. Not that we can discriminate, after all there's no rule about that. --lincalinca 23:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Hi Spebi, and thanks for the barnstar.....Hopefully I will be getting some more Australian cricketers off to GA and FA status....Don Tallon, Alan Davidson, Allan Border, Mark Waugh, Bill Lawry, Bob Simpson and Darren Lehmann the info is there but needs a cleanup....and those 8 cricketer GAs that need to be FAed ....I wish I could write proper English though..... Anyway, since you are listed down as being in the ACT I wonder if you could find sources for Canberra and History of the Australian Capital Territory. I did a survey of all the Aussie FAs yesterday and these two had a very low references per prose size ratio (underreferenced). Regards, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Sure, I'll start on those two in a moment. The New South Wales articles aren't too good either... New South Wales has some of the best colleges and universities (I think so, anyway) and a Education in New South Wales article doesn't even exist! :| ~ Sebi[talk] 02:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, there are a few not so good sport ones there as well... but why do we need a peer review out of interest? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the vote of confidence.
Hi S[p]ebi,
Thank you very much for your vote of confidence in support of my RfA. It closed a few hours ago, and based on the outcome, I now see a few extra tabs at the top of the page :)
In any event, I would like to express my appreciation for your participation, and would do my best to maintain your trust while serving the community. Given that I never interacted with you prior to the RfA, I am grateful for your effort to assume good faith on my behalf.
If you need help with a desired administrative action, please feel free to contact me and I will do my best to assist. Cheers, --Aarktica 00:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Good work with the portal :)
I had a look tonight, looks pretty good! I've added it to the WikiProject Council listing for NSW. Orderinchaos 13:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Ah, this is just the wikiproject directory. It links it officially with the WP:NSW project, but I don't think a huge number of people go there. It can be listed on the portals directory when it's more complete. I would offer to help, but until the end of Dec I'm going to be quite busy - I will be in a few random parts of NSW from 22 Nov to 2 Dec though so will be probably taking quite a few photos that may be of use. Orderinchaos 23:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Proposal notices
First of all, the count was about 40 (about 80 edits because of an omitted piece of information). Secondly, FYI, I had posted at 5 logical locations for this topic:
After about 5 or 6 hours with no responses I decided to just go down the featured list log and notify recent (Sept and Oct) nominators of featured list candidates and closers of featured list discussions because they would be interested in the topic. WRT, WP:CANVASS this clearly passes 3 of th 4 criteria and likely passes the 4th. I.e, it is transparent, neutral and non-partisan. The only question is whether it is excessive cross-posting. In this issue the question is who are involved editors. I could have sent messages to all persons who have participated in FLC discussions. However, the people who are most involved in FL content are those who nominate the articles and those who close the debates. I am considering doing June, July and August this afternoon with this in mind. I am not sure what the community portal is and don't believe proposals are properly listed at goings-on.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:05, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
I wasn't accusing you of canvassing, but rather, just noting that posting the same message to a lot of users' talk pages isn't the best way to get people in the know about your proposal. Just a post on those pages you listed above and the community portal and I'm sure that would have been enough to get the word around enough. ~ Sebi[talk] 21:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
*pokes*
Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Fine, I won't. I actually have a bit of a to-do list for that article too, here. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Hallo, you've removed my notification
[5] with edit comment removing 172.163, received insufficient warnings, list not empty. For future occasions, I would like to learn why my warning on User_talk:172.163.27.244 was insufficient.
Another point is that the same person with similar 172. IPs seems to edit-war on Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, see [6]. Perhaps it would be usefull to semi-protect the article.
Greetings, --Schwalker 11:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Okay, you reported 172.163.27.244 (talk·contribs) on the page (diff) for "insulting me on their talk-page after a warning". I'm not sure which IP you are talking about here, but looking through this IP's contributions, I see no edits to any talk pages. Initially, when I removed your report, I had not checked that user's contributions, and just looked at the talk page and saw no warnings for the supposed insults. My apologies if this incident has caused you any incovenience. On a side note, articles that are currently being edit-warred over are not semi-protected, but rather are full protected (see Wikipedia:Protection policy) ~ Sebi[talk] 11:28, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Elaborating on this; when I used the term "received no warnings" in my edit summary, I was not referring to the IP address' supposed homophobic comments, but rather, for the insults you said that a similar IP had placed on your talk page. ~ Sebi[talk] 11:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your answers.
Well, the warning was not on my talk-page but on the talk page of User_talk:172.163.27.244. I see only now that a different but similar IP 172.163.22.73 had made the Stalinist(...) remark on User_talk:172.163.27.244, and subsequently removed the automatic signature: [7]. The IP 172.163.22.73 also was edit-warring on Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche with a similar homophobic remark. Now still another IP is reverting there. It is not my decission to make, but I guess that per semi-protection this person could be hindered from continuing to edit there. --Schwalker 11:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I think I understand now, but a single attack on a talk page does not warrant a block. If protection is necessary in content disputes no matter who is involved, full protection will be used, and not semi-protection. ~ Sebi[talk] 12:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Sydney is new ACOTF
Hi. You voted for Sydney as WP:ACOTF. It recently lost WP:GA status. It has been selected, so please help to improve it in any way you can. Thanks. --Scott DavisTalk 14:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Picture uploading
Hi, I would like to know if you know whether or not I can use a picture uploaded onto a different language, for the english article. I wnt to find a group picture of Alice in Chains and other languages have some. Can I use them? Skeeker[Talk] 18:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Which different language Wikipedia are you talking about? I might be able to help better if you can provide more details. ~ Sebi[talk] 05:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
For your contribution to My RfA, which passed with 8000 Supports, 2 Neutrals and no opposes.
The standards and dedication of the English Wikipeidan Administrators is excellent and I am privileged to stand among them. Thankyou for putting you trust in me, I'll not see it abused. And now, I will dance naked around a fire. Party at my place! Cheers! Dfrg.msc 08:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
We're almost there, but we've been asked to trim the lead (now that it's merged) and remove unnecessary information. Would you mind doing the honours? I'm too fussy when it comes to that and can never know what should stay and what should go. --lincalinca 04:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
I kind of just did it a bit blind: I closed my eyes and thought to myself "what really needs to be here" and whatever didn't come into my head went into the past. We don't really need the members listed, nor do we need to address the awards. Certifications and releases are the most appropriate things to note. I'm pretty sure the prose needs some reworking, but I'm so wrecked right now, I'm more handy with a machete than bonsai scissors right now. --lincalinca 06:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm rather confused as to when I should run..., I promise I'll let you nominate or at least give some form of nomination statement when I do (on the condition that you don't bookmark this diff ;)) ~ Sebi[talk] 08:11, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
In response to your question here, I do get that problem. Not sure about Linc though. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 00:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I mis-estimated the line-height I should use. I've fixed it now, though. I just thought it looked pretty ugly all spaces apart, but was overzealous in how tiny I made the linespacing afterwards. It's somewhat fixed now, but I'm probably not going to be done with that template for a while. I still have a few things I want to do with it. --lincalinca 02:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
re. this - I looked, but found nothing. Maybe you should buy it ;) Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Portal:North West England peer review
Thanks for the comments. Would you be willing to assist me in the development? Regards, RudgetContributions 17:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
NSW
See my last edit to the talk page. Handy trick to know. :) Orderinchaos 01:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Haha, thanks :) ~ Sebi[talk] 02:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
The Chaser
I've deleted other Chaser-cruft of late (The Chaser Eulogy Song being one) and this one caught my eye as being more of the same. Perhaps the AfD was premature. I understand what you're doing now, however I won't withdraw the AfD just yet to see if anyone has any issues with the article being split up as such. -- Longhair\talk 21:38, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
It did appear to me the article was created then abandoned. This isn't the case so I'll happily withdraw the AfD if it appears the forking is warranted. -- Longhair\talk 21:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you very much for taking the time to revert the vandalism to my user page; why anyone would blank the page is beyond me. Cheers, --Aarktica 22:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
GAN - Transfusion
I've put up Transfusion (EP) for GA. Hope you don't mind, but I'm certain it's ready for it. There's just not THAT much more information that can be gleaned for it. --lincalinca 04:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
I added the DYK box you suggested some time ago after ferreting about in the archives, although I didn't get round to noting it in the peer review page until now. Any other suggestions would be more than welcome. Cheers, -- Chris B • talk 11:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
I'll have a look later, busy with other stuff right now. Sorry, ~ Sebi 04:54, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Hmm...I could look, but I'm not sure if there would be anything. You can always just try URL smashing - see Wikipedia:WikiProject Powderfinger/Fanclub for what the URL should look like. Otherwise I'll google a bit more, that's all I tried before (to no avail). Best to ask Linca, I'm quite sure he wrote it. And thanks for the DYK kudos :) Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Haha, I'd rather not give in on this one :) If we include a discog section, I think it should be all or nothing. Including one single from each year makes sense to you, but I didn't pick that up when I looked at it, and had I not known that there were more singles, I would've thought that was the lot. Which isn't the case. — H2O — 09:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, I quite like my sig too :) — H2O — 09:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey speb, on the main page, you undid and then re-did what I did last night with the triple j refs. I know it doesn't look good in the code, but it looks reasonably presentable in the actual references section, and it gives direct references to all of the entries. Did you revert my edit before checking what I wrote in the peer review? --lincalinca 04:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, sort of. I didn't think you wrote anything in the peer review at all, at one stage, then I checked back to see if any changes. Sorry ;) It does look good, makes things clearer for readers when viewing the reference. ~ Sebi 04:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Awesome! It's just a shame there's no "multicite" template. It'd be too complex, though, and it would most probably end up being used incorrectly. This works for this purpose. Other than this one case, it's best we continue to use the templates. --lincalinca 04:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thank you very much. It is much appreciated. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 21:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Vulture Street
They'd be typos then - the band calls him DiDia in all their productions. — H2O — 02:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I was thinking that the FLC for that page should be reopened, because Circeus had just opposed the page hours ago and generally we shouldn't close pages until the nominators have had a chance to address the opposition. -- Scorpion0422 06:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
It's okay, I've been closing FLCs for over 2 months and I still forget to do things quite often (like check dates, add </div> tags, update the FL count, etc, etc). It's nice to see that other people besides me are interested in closing them. -- Scorpion0422 06:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you voted on the List of the Day proposal. A new one has been made and your comments are welcome. The Placebo Effect 02:00, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
He's been blocked for 24 hours for external linkspamming, let's see if he's taken this as a chance to cool down a bit. ~ Sebi 21:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I am contacting you as you were part of the original discussion.
thank you very much
Zhan Li
Zhanliusc 21:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
criticism
Regarding this. Not going to revert, of course. I would however appreciate something a bit more specific. I'm fairly sure there's a good deal to criticise about my contribs and behaviour, so if you'd like to address something specific, you're absolutely welcome to do so at any time, whether in the criticism section or at my talk. — Dorftrottel 12:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I wasn't actually planning on giving criticism when I made that edit, I just pretty much... made the edit. ~ Sebi 21:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok, no worries. At any rate, what I said above still holds. Should you ever feel like giving me feedback, just go ahead. — Dorftrottel 12:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi!, I know this might seem unusual, but could you please review the article in question as the nomination ends on the 12th of november and am worried it might not get enough nominations before the deadline.
Many thanks.Marcus Bowen 13:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
If it doesn't receive enough support, then the time will be extended for a few extra days. Nothing really to be worried about. The best thing you can do for it now is to try and implement the suggestions made into the article, and you are likely to receive support from whoever made those suggestions. I'll have a peek through and let you know what I think a little later. ~ Sebi 20:57, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
This is looking pretty good...methinks if the refs go inline, we can add it to the article and go from there. DihydrogenMonoxide 03:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
We'll put it in once we can dig up some more stuff from that Rosie Beaton interview, I'm reluctant to have one-liners in the article. I'll implement the refs in now. Spebi 03:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you've heard, but Nobody Sees is set to be the next single (saw it on an add for Dream Days). Can you/have you found any RS for that? DihydrogenMonoxide 04:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Haven't heard anything about that yet actually, I'll see what I can find later. What do you think of the image under Philanthropy? I don't know why I chose it, it just appealed to me out of the other hundred or so of Jeanie's photos from the concert :) Spebi 04:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Admin?
Hey man, have you ever considered becoming an admin? You've got a nice healthy edit count spread across the namespaces, and the work you've done on Powderfinger and other articles is impressive. I'd be happy to nominate you if you like. Let me know, okay? GlassCobra 08:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Whoa... give me some time to think this over... Spebi 08:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
I'll give you a proper response tomorrow, promise. Spebi 09:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
I've started the ball rolling at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Spebi, if anyone wants to add to my nomination with their own, please do so :) Spebi, if you don't want to accept this nomination at this stage, please just tag it and have it speedy deleted. Cheers, Daniel 04:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I wasn't going to be around later, so thought I'd offer my support early. :) Remind me to call back past your RfA if it moves faster than I do ok. -- Longhair\talk 05:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I can re-add it for you when it is transcluded later on if you're offline, unless you want to do it yourself :) Spebi 05:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I'll be back eventually :) -- Longhair\talk 05:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
OMG I fully hate you right now! Nice philanthropy image though, and get on GT! DihydrogenMonoxide 08:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Neutrality Project
Hi, I'm trying to ensure that the Neutrality Project has not become inactive. If you would still like to participate in it, please re-add your name to the Review Team list. Jame§ugrono 08:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Nah, sorry, I won't. I've been busy with other projects recently, haven't been able to help out at all, actually :( Spebi 08:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Band members
[[Talk:Powderfinger#Band_members] - What do you think? DihydrogenMonoxide 02:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
RfA
I considered not spamming talk pages but not saying "thanks" just isn't me. The support was remarkable and appreciated. I only hope that I am able to help a little on here. Please let me know if I can help you or equally if you find any of my actions questionable. Thanks & regards --Herbytalk thyme 11:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Huh? You mean the default signature now includes a talk link? DihydrogenMonoxide 23:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Yep, now includes a talk link. Spebi 23:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
And it's been like that since the 14th? OK... DihydrogenMonoxide 23:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
That page has existed since the 14th, however, a MediaWiki page is pretty much useless unless some part of the software calls it. Relevant village pump discussion. Spebi 23:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
What do I do to exclude the talk link? Acalamari 23:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Tick the raw signature box, and replace the text in the signature box with the following code: [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]]. The software will only trigger the talk link if you just enter Acalamari with raw signature not ticked. Spebi 23:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Test:
Hi, I'm Spebi, and I don't have the raw signature box ticked. Spebi (talk) 23:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Spebi, and my signature is [[User:Spebi|Spebi]] and the raw signature box is ticked. Spebi 23:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Done. Thank you. :) Acalamari 00:00, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Your monobook is showing up in CAT:CSD. Gimmetrow 02:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Obviously it's that new CSD tool I added went haywire... fixed now, hopefully :) Thanks for the note Spebi 02:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Powderfinger dates
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I hadn't noticed we were using American standardising with the dates, but we should be using Australian, since the text style used should match the source of the subject matter (i.e. they're an Australian band, so the date formatting should be in the format used bu Australians, so day then month). This may take a while to amend all to be this way so we should probably ask Alex to run giggabot to format all of them to the standard Aussie format. --lincalinca 05:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I can do it by hand, if you like :) Plus, as far as I know, it's only Dream Days that needs date formatting... wait a moment, do you mean American style is November 17, 2007, and Australian style is 1 November2007? My personal views on this one is Month Date, Year, but there is no guideline or a MOS page forbidding either, all they ask for is that the date formatting is consistent throughout the article. Hmmm... Spebi 05:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
My understanding is the dte should be in the format used based on the locality of the article, and the standard australian format is DD MM CCYY, so we should employ that there. --lincalinca 05:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
My understanding is that if a topic is related to Australia, then the article should use Australian English – but it doesn't have to. The Manual of Style says it doesn't really matter which style is used (but it's preferable that in this example, Australian english is used). WP:MOSDATE#Dates says nothing about Month Date, Year, vs. DD MM CCYY, however, I think that we should stick with Month Date, Year, simply because a lot of the Powderfinger articles are already formatted with this, and the only article I know otherwise is Dream Days and Nobody Sees. Spebi 05:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I've used DD/MM/YY on Dream Days - I dunno if that's Australian or American (Aussie, I think), but I'm with Linca on this. DihydrogenMonoxide 07:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I just don't really see the point of changing all the dates on all the articles to satisfy some sort of criteria that doesn't exist. All the Manual of Style says is that whatever format we use, it must be used throughout the whole article. Nothing about same format throughout all articles in a topic, nothing about format based on locality (that was for dialects of English). Plus, this probably belongs on the project talk page or on Talk:Powderfinger, so some other members can have a say. Spebi 19:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
speedy criteria
If you want to become an admin, read WP:CSD, where you will find that fictional characters can not be speedied as non notable, only real people. there's a reason for this, which is that ,many articles on real people are easy to judge unequivocally as non-notable, but fictional ones are easy to misjudge if only two people look at it. DGG (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I wasn't thinking straight this morning. I have read WP:CSD many times, I probably just skipped over that part. I'll be more careful next time :| Spebi 21:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Although that part is a defining element in A7, I probably should have paid more attention to it, and for that matter, all parts of CSD, regardless of how minor they are. Spebi 21:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Hi; thanks for your support to my RfA, which closed successfully at (51/1/2). I'll keep this brief since I don't like spamming anyone: I'll work hard to deserve the trust you placed in me. Thanks again. — Coren(talk) 23:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Powderfinger
Sorry Spebi, I've more or less left Wikipedia at this time. After the OHM FAC I'm pretty much done. Maybe I'll return in the future. Regards, NSR77TC 05:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Hrmm :( Good luck with whatever you decide to do, and good luck with OHM :) Your work on Red Hot Chili Peppers articles and pretty much everything and anything alternative-related, really is appreciated. Spebi 06:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Good luck with your RFA! NSR77TC 17:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations
You are now an admin! Secretlondon (talk) 09:16, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Wow, all the new buttons... thanks :) Spebi 09:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Ooooh shiiiiiny :) Yayy - congratulations :) Now quick, get to work!! - Alison❤ 09:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome aboard - now you can block your own vandals and save me the bother! You may also be interested in WP:CSDAR, which makes CSD deletions easier. BencherliteTalk 09:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Will do, I finished reporting that one to AIV and back to his talk page when I see the [block] button :) I was like "eeek!" ;) Spebi 09:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations! Daniel 09:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Daniel, and thanks for the nomination :) Spebi 09:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Dang! How did I miss another important RfA I would have gladly given a nice rambling support opinion on? Ahhh, well, you did not need it, and instead, I shall just say congratulations! May your mop water always be clean! ~*Grin*~ Ariel♥Gold 09:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Aww, thanks Ariel! :) Spebi 09:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Well done. Long live Australia! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations on becoming a new admin! To learn a little about how to work your new tools, check out the New admin school. If you like, you can use the userbox {{User:EVula/Userboxes/admin since|year=2007|month=11|day=20}} on your user page to display how long you have been an admin. Best! -- Jreferee t/c 01:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
LOTD experiment
Now that my project is fully up and running, I though you might want to consider the four main benefits of my method over the one that you seem to be supporting:
There is a set of orphaned articles for persons who do not have any featured lists of their own or persons that would like to take responsibility for more. Anyone can nominate such orphans. This benefits WP by getting people involved in list articles that might not have active editors to update them or defend them against vandalism. Please consider adopting one of our orphans.
Each list will be encouraged to respond to commentary and feedback during the candidacy period, which will hopefully improve the quality of the articles.
Articles without pictures will be encouraged to find them. E.g., List of Harry Potter films cast members had no image before its nominator added an image for this experiment. This type of thing, of course, improves the project.
Articles are encouraged to add relevant projects to their talk page. This alerts other project to articles that they would likely have an interest in and would be able to either improve or protect.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 17:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not interested in the list experiment anymore. Spebi 19:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hehe, thanks Andonic :) Spebi 20:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome. Unfortunately, Riana will soon archive her talk page, so you might want to update that link when she does. We don't want anyone not to find that link now, do we? ;) I'll update it here too. · AndonicOTalk 21:40, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hahaha I saw that thread when you first posted it, and thought it was just hilarious! That should never be archived! :o) Ariel♥Gold 09:11, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Kill chris g on AIV
I do realise that the username blatantly attacks Chris G (talk·contribs), however, AIV isn't UAA. He has been blocked, but I just felt that it really wasn't necessary to report; 2 edits to Canberra, an article unrelated to Chris G, to me just don't "indicate a vandalism-only account". Spebi 08:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Very well, next time i will just take the long, bureaucratic route then, either by reverting four vandalisms, or by waiting till he is blocked due to a personal attack/user name violation. This time i just cut an edge since i was certain that it was a vandal only account (Cant blame me for expecting that based upon his actions/username). But if you ask me, taking this long route is just a long way to the same result. --Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 08:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not suggesting you do anything, I'm just sayign that at the time when I removed your request, I felt that 2 edits didn't indicate a vandalism-only account – obviously, I was wrong. I wasn't suggesting that next time you wait for things to happen. I'm sorry for bringing this all on you. Spebi 08:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Not a problem at all. Generally taken offensive user names create a high risk level for vandalism (EG: Bad faith against a username). Personally i believe that a bad faith username counts as a vandalism on it own, which leaves space for two additional vandalisms. When that threshold is reached, i simply report them. (Note: ONLY when its clear vandalism such as blanking, adding clear proficiency lines, or intentionally adding wrong information.) It might be a little fast, but after reporting 500 or so vandals, it kind of became clear that this is for the best in 99% of the cases (It saves myself and my fellow vandalism partols some work) :) --Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 08:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I agree, I doubt any bad faith vandal would create an account attacking a particular user and then use it for making constructive contributions, but then again, it might occur. Spebi 08:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
A belated Thanks...
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage (7th Nov.) and congratulations on making admin ;)). Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 18:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Haha, I can't remember even remember that :) Thanks, Spebi 19:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Question
Would it be considered acceptable to use an interview posted on youtube as a reference? Stewy5714talk 20:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I think I'd be able to help you a bit more if you provide the YouTube video in question, or perhaps the article which you hope to cite the video in. It is possible to cite a television episode without having to link to a YouTube video, I have done this before, and it is possible to cite books without providing a link to a copy of the book online. So, I think that the answer to your question is yes, it might be considered acceptable to use that interview on YouTube as a reference, but in terms of "reliable sources", it may be better to find a transcript of that interview, or just cite the interview episode directly using {{cite video}}. Spebi 20:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to bug you about this, but I think you missed the last step. The new content/history wasn't restored --Closedmouth (talk) 06:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I think I fixed it now. Forgive me, I'm not an expert when it comes to history merges. Spebi 07:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Heh, no problem. It seems fairly complex/confusing, but practice makes perfect, as the old cliché goes. --Closedmouth (talk) 11:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
The bot was down when I did what I did. Also since the bot does not archive any of the requests [8] (i.e. removing oldest ones only), I was doing exactly the same. --202.40.139.171 (talk) 04:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
I was under the impression that the bot archived the requests... sorry. Spebi 04:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
No problem, happy editing and congratulations of being admin! --202.40.139.171 (talk) 04:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Hehe, thanks :) Spebi 04:52, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Undeletion request
Resolved
– Subject obviously not notable, Engbrendan was using the article as an advertisement.
Hello spebi I hope I am in the wright place in terms of contacting you,as I am in quite a rush.Just wondering If there is any chance that you could return my Airy fairy gang page that you have just deleted. The band I will admit is relatively unknown, but they do have a large support.This Wikipedia page would be a major incentive for getting the band off the ground,as you must understand how important the internet is for bands like this.
If you can reconsider youre deletion,the band and myself would be greatfull
yours sincerly
Brendan English
Cricklewood
London
England
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Engbrendan (talk • contribs) 20:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I deleted the page because the subject was not notable. I'm not going to restore the page, as you have just admitted that the page will be used for advertising the band. Wikipedia is not a place to advertise bands or other items, we are an encyclopedia. Spebi 20:42, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Spebi. I noticed that you removed the speedy tag from the above article. Given that it is complete bollocks, is there any reason why there needs to be a wait required under the PROD method to delete this article? I feel it is a nonsense article that should be deleted on sight and not kept for a second longer than needed. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 21:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Well, it's been deleted and redirected to Streets ice cream now... sorry, I just removed the tag thinking that having both of them there wasn't a good idea. I thought that someone had prodded the article and forgot to take away the speedy tag, and so I did that, but obviously that wasn't the case :) Sorry about the confusion. Spebi 21:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the very prompt response. Actually, I could have been bold and redirected it myself if I had been thinking. I left the PROD tag on in case the speedy was declined by an administrator as asserting notability, which I have seen with even worse articles than that! Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 21:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
request to undo page deleting
hey there. i'm fairly new to editing wikipedia, therefore i'd like to ask you to undelete the page i am currently working on. the page is containing information about hungarian hardcore metal band bridge to solace, who are one of the most actively touring (over 200 shows in nearly 20 countries around europe) and recording artists in hungary. as i mentioned, i may be new to wikipedia and was willing to try out how to get my article in shape, sorry about that. thanks a lot, Zjakab (talk) 21:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
I deleted the article because it supposedly did not meet the notability criteria for bands. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (music) before recreating the article, making sure that the article indicates the importance of the topic. Thanks, Spebi 22:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Just wanted to say thanks for supporting me! Please find your thank you card here, should you wish to see it. I'm honored to have received your support. And congrats on your recently successful RfA as well. All the best, ~Eliz81(C) 02:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comex
It read like an advertisement to me. Therefore I proposed a speedy in good faith. Doesn't need the comment left in edit summary, am referring to afd. Regards. Hammer1980·talk 01:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
86.135.249.89
Not to go against your will but the user I reported 86.135.249.89 commented on my talk page as can be see(here) after I had logged off which means an act of vandalism was committed but was not detected until later and if I am right that still counts as vandalism even if it was later. If you read the edit it states "We the none Nazi's" and not only that the user seems to be under the impression that we are a socialist website "As Wikipedia was set up as the "Socialist International's" mouthpiece; then, either you allow point of view, or you are simply; "The Nazi Party"; hiding behined, "The Socialist International"." To my knowledge we are neither a democracy or any other form of government as they go against WP:NPOV...I really hope I got that one right...anyways. If I sound rude at all during this I am sorry my intention is to understand your stance on this and see why a block was not given. 02:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Okay, you made this report to WP:AIV at 02:39 (UTC) today. In your report, you stated that the IP address in question had vandalised your talk page (diff, at 23:26 yesterday) after a final warning. The final warning was given on his talk page at 22:46 (UTC) yesterday. If my version of events is correct, the order of what happened was attack → warning → AIV report, and so I removed the report from the noticeboard, knowing that a block should not be instated. If the IP address was to make another attack on anyone else, then for sure, it would be blocked. Spebi 03:12, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
The attack of the other user was this afternoon, the attack on page took place "19:26, November 24" and I reverted it at "22:37, November 24, 2007" that was to my talk page Rgoodermote 03:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Looking at the IP's contributions, the only edits he made were on November 24 (UTC), but you decide to report on November 25 a few hours after the attacks on yours and Nburden's talk pages. This is obviously a conflict between time zones here, so I am willing to block the IP address should he persist in making attacks on any user at any time again. Spebi 03:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
That is fine with me, sorry for the inconvenience and I wish you a good day. Rgoodermote 03:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Why did you block this user? He has made two edits; one is apparently a good faith edit, and the other could have been a mistake. In addition, he recieved only two warnings. I(talk) 04:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. I was in the process of declining the report, but he was already blocked. Also, apparently both warnings were for the same offense. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, that appeared to me as a block I shouldn't have done... I've unblocked now. I haven't been making good choices in my blocks, lately, I think I'm going to stay away from AIV for a bit now... Spebi 04:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
It might be nice, as a gesture, to make note of this on the talk page and remove the block notice. I(talk) 04:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for correcting everything Spebi, take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Article Deletion
How come my article was deleted? You see, I actually tried to research on it. I guess the info I had was little. Pokemon Buffy Titan (talk) 12:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm assuming you are referring to Jump City, correct? I deleted the article under speedy deletion criterion G4, which allows any page that has been recreated after it was speedily deleted, or deleted by deletion debate. In the case of this article, it was originally deleted per an AfD debate, and then deleted 3 more times under CSD G4, and I just happened to delete the article a fourth time, and the title has now been protected for recreation. Spebi 20:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking this IP. He/she was posting some gibberish on dozens of articles. Of course, popups let me revert as quick as they could paste, but still - a merry chase. Thanks again! ZZClaims~ Evidence 05:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Seriously. I think the AIV desk was empty for a while, lol. Thanks for nabbing that, Spebi! That was a copy/paste from Unencyclopedia, he was pasting, btw :) Ariel♥Gold 05:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Make sure the images on Commons with a different name aren't linked to an article with the original name. You deleted one 8 minutes before I was able to get the image renamed (infobox issue). Just a heads up. Lara❤Love 05:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my Talk page. --Paul Erik (talk) 05:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
The removal of the tag
The article has no reference and citation and no intention of the creator to improve the article in almost a month. After I encountered the creator once, I convince that the article is result of his thought. The editor is very famous for his "certain" sentiment. The grade of importance is very lowest among Korean related articles. I may I tagged the unsuitable tag, but I think it is to be expanded by the creator or to be deleted because there is too many important Korean stub articles here. Or could you give me a hint about where I have to plead for the article to be deleted? Thanks--Appletrees (talk) 06:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I removed the tag simply because the article didn't meet the speedy deletion criteria it was originally tagged for. The article wasn't eligible for deletion under CSD A1; articles that don't provide context of the subject, or articles that cover what the subject does, but not what the subject is, so I removed the tag. If you still believe the article meets speedy deletion criteria, but not the one it was originally tagged for, review Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and see if it actually does. Otherwise, you could try prodding the article and after 5 days of the deletion being uncontested, it will be deleted. Spebi 07:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for handling 71.107.173.86
Thanks a ton on taking care of that dude. I was just doing vandal patrol and seen him blanking templates, so I followed through as per norm. I decided to escalate quickly when the personal attacks started. Sat back and watched you handle that mess as it unfolded. Almost epic but I bet you guys see a lot more of that then I do on just basic vandal patrol. :-) Looks like he might be a sock puppet too. Anyways, thanks a bunch... ZacBowling(user|talk) 09:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Hehe, no problem :) I guess the type of stuff that you encounter gradually increases to tougher, more nail-biting, policy-violating, ArbCom-involving, offwiki-harrassing sort of stuff. I'll be following up the sockpuppet business in a moment, too. Spebi 09:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
oops. I have you the wrong ip. updated the section title. didn't want you running off and getting the wrong guy. :-) ZacBowling(user|talk) 09:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of King George II Inn. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --evrik(talk) 14:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey Spebi. Good work with your new tools, and well done in earning them. I have a complaint about the above user, whom you recently blocked for 31 hours, due to vandalism, abusive editing, trolling and generally being a pain in the rear. However, you also, after blocking the user, declined their unblock request (see here, here).
This should generally be left to a third-party, neutral Administrator, even in clear-cut cases like this. It helps uphold the integrity of the appeals process of our blocking system, as I'm sure you'll understand. If you disagree with my complaint, I'd be more than willing to discuss it, but otherwise, cheers for your time and catch you around.
Right, thanks. It didn't seem right to deal with the request myself, but it didn't occur to me that leaving the request to another uninvolved administrator would be the right choice at the time, but it appears that it was. Thanks for the note :) Spebi 04:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I would like to make contact with the main editors or writers of the PSYCHO 1960 film article. The article itself did not seem to provide a way to do this. The article seems to have been drastically reorganizated including deletions of certain items with no explanations provided. One point that was deleted I know myself to have been incorrect, so that is probably why it was removed. However, several other online sources still use the older version of the Wikipedia article, and the same basic incorrect information is quite popular on the Web elsewhere. The real story behind the error is quite interesting in its own right, so I would like to include it in a newer version of the article or perhaps make a separate related article. I have plenty of documentation to back me up. I would like to make contact with these editors to find out the best way to do this and perhaps discover exactly what their expertise on PSYCHO is. If you need more precise information on exactly what I am talking about, please let me know. You have my permission to forward my letter to the appropriate person.
Note that articles at WP:FLC require four support votes in order for the article to be promoted. Please do not close the nominations prematurely. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR(Converse) 08:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I ignored that rule because we shouldn't be just paying attention to the amount of votes. That particular FLC ran for at least 10 days (11, or 12? hrm...) and so consensus to promote had been achieved. If anyone had any concerns, they had enough time to make them clear, and so I promoted the article. Spebi 08:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Nevertheless, until the guidelines for the page are changed, wait for four support votes. I've had lists that had objections raised by an extra set of eyes placed on the page when there were only supports before (lots of experience here no?). If you wish to change this, then go ahead and raise a discussion, but I doubt it will go through unless a "featured list director" in the vein of Raul is placed to avoid arbitrary closes. Regards, Sephiroth BCR(Converse) 08:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh please. The 4 support rule is only there to make sure a consensus is reached, and because the particular FLC in question (which I'm not even sure what it is) ended over 10 days ago, I'm pretty sure that it was up there long enough for anyone with concerns to voice them. Consensus was achieved, promote. And next time we have a conflict, do you mind coming to me about this issue first, and see what I say about it, rather than reverting everything I've done? It's just the extra trouble that could have been avoided. Spebi 08:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Raise the issue at WT:FLC before going through with it. I have no problems with the actual process, I'm simply saying don't jump the gun until such a thing is actually implemented. Just wait the extra days. There's no deadline you're missing. And more often than not, the lack of comments is due to a lack of people looking at the nomination rather than anything else. No need to WP:IGNORE in this case. Sephiroth BCR(Converse) 08:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I've started a discussion concerning the matter here. Feel free to comment. At the moment, however, I'm going to revert your promotions, but will naturally yield to any consensus raised there. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR(Converse) 08:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm not rushing anything here. I took a look at the subpage and it clearly stuck out at me as "consensus had been reached". It's a valid opportunity to ignore the so-called "4 supports" rule, and in my opinion I don't really see how waiting the extra day would do much at all. And I doubt that in this case the lack of 4 supports was due to a lack of not being visible for long enough. It was on the page longer than the "10 days" rule says, and I saw that all the concerns raised before it was closed had been addressed. I'm not going to start a discussion on WT:FLC, because I don't want to change the "4 supports" rule. The reason why WP:IAR is in place is to allow rules to be ignored, not to allow rules to be changed so it can only be used in extreme cases. In my opinion, I appropriately applied my judgement in this situation. Spebi 08:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Fine, fine. Participate in the discussion in any case, as you instigated this, and there's no reason to break WP:3RR over this matter. Consensus will deal the decision. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR(Converse) 08:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hold on a second buddy, two reverts doesn't constitute a valid 3RR violation. I'd say you are jumping the gun now. I wasn't intending on reverting you a second time, in fact I think that you should not have reverted in the first place, and rather, discuss to come up with a solution. Spebi 08:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I was referring to me breaking 3RR first. Anyhow, I reverted initially since you closed the nomination without a summary explaining why you were ignoring the guidelines for a close. Without such a thing, it provides the impression that you're closing it prematurely. Sephiroth BCR(Converse) 08:39, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
So it was a wrong on my part because I didn't provide a summary of why I ignored the 4 support rule? I thought it was quite obvious. Then again, nothing is obvious to those who don't understand that it was obvious. I'm continuing this dispute at WT:FLC. Spebi 08:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
There's no need to be confrontational, especially when I've conceded the point already, ending the "dispute." I'm simply explaining my rationale, and personal attacks aren't necessary nor welcomed. In any case, 'night. Sephiroth BCR(Converse) 08:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Actually I wasn't intending to attack you at all. Sorry if it came across that way. Spebi 04:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative music November 2007 Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 00:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Aussie newspaper
Hi there. Can we have a section on FAs and GAs. We have a bit of momentum on the article writing front and it would be good if we could generate a long term article writing culture. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Done. I'm not really update to date with the recent happenings in the GA world, so I think I'll leave that part to you :) And yeah, it'd be really great if this continues. When the project first started, a lot of stuff happened, articles promoted, new ones created, but as the original members started to retire and die out, it sort of drifted into inactivity. Perhaps with this and other things to come we can start the project booming again. Spebi 05:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
You can ask BrownBot to do the spamming. He does lots of project newspapers. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I chatted with the BrownBot's owner and he will do the spamming for us. Can you tweak the links to the archive and start an opt out list and we will be good to go. Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey belated congrats
I've been extremely busy lately so I haven't had as much time for Wikipedia as I did a couple of months back. Congrats on the RFA... I'd like to think you were successful because of the editor review I did ;) Seriously though, it was pretty obvious then that you were well on your way. Cheers! -- Flyguy649talk 06:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, and welcome back :) The review you gave me really helped, more than the usual sort of stuff I get from editor reviews. Thanks again. Spebi 06:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I was counting it by months and that was why I didn't include Riverina that was passed in November - since it's easier to keep track using a set date. I hope it continues as well. I've just put up two GACs but it might be a while before anyone gets to them. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
An award for you
Seb26, I am pleased to issue you with the Drover's Award. The Award is given to Australian Wikipedians who work tirelessly behind the scenes, especially on WikiProject and Portal maintenance tasks. Thanks for your contributions which help build a better encyclopedia. —Moondyne 00:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Just wanted to add a word of thanks regarding the CSS fact styling, I was beginning to think nobody would answer that question. Have a great day Mfko 01:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
re. Kyoto Protocol
Maybe...I mean, it did get a fair bit of coverage. Anyways, you can create it there! :) Dihydrogen Monoxide♫ 07:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
I just noticed this.[9]DurovaCharge! 08:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Sunn...set over the bea-chez..from now on......doo-dooo etc. - Congrats on the FA(s).cheers, Casliber (talk·contribs) 01:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks :) I've seen about 3 live performances of that song, and the version on their latest DVD is by far the best. Spebi 04:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Ahaaa, thanks for the haeds up..will have to track that down as I feel it is their best song...cheers, Casliber (talk·contribs) 06:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Godsmack
Hi, would you please talk some sense into User:Demantos. He is trying to merge Godsmack discography with Godsmack. Godsmack has enough music to warrent a seperate article for discography, and any substantially successful band has one on wikipedia. Please comment on his talk page, and comment here.
I've made a comment. I don't think it will be merged, it seems a lot of people (including those with article writing experience in the area, e.g. M3tal H3ad, WesleyDodds) are opposed to it, and I can't see any valid points from Demantos so far. Spebi 04:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Could you comment on this please. Thank you, Skeeker[Talk] 03:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering why you chose this article to go on the main page at this early stage? It's still being worked on by myself, and it has a huge "under construction" notice. I'd appreciate if you could pick some other article that has been there longer, whilst I finish it off. Thanks Redrocketboy 08:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm new to the whole DYK selection. I think I'll pick some of the older ones next time. Spebi 08:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Spebi, you should pick the older suggestions, from 4 or 5 days back, that are about to expire. Never pick new ones. Please read WP:DYK. Thanks. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Okay okay, I messed up. I'll read the full instructions next time. Spebi 08:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
No, no, it's an easy mistake to make. After all, we always need admin's help at DYK. Thanks. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Would you mind closing this FLC? I am the nominator, and although I have passed (and in two cases, failed) my past stuff, in this case there is enough support to pass, but still opposition, so I want to avoid any criticism and not close it. Thanks, Scorpion0422 03:13, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Done. I guess the extra days really did something, and give others a chance to comment. Anyway. Spebi 03:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the clarification on that. I've not really been involved much with ANI in the past, and wasn't sure whether it should still be taken care of via AIAV. I've came a long way since you gave me my first barnstar, but there's still room for me to learn new things. ;) --Dreaded Walrustc 05:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Hehe, your name rang a bell in my mind :) That's okay, it took a little while for me to get used to these sorts of things. Look forward to seeing you on the wiki soon :) Spebi 05:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Please be aware of the following statement in WP:CSD#G4:
This does not apply to content that has been moved to user space, undeleted via deletion review, deleted via proposed deletion, or to speedy deletions (although in that case, the previous speedy criterion, or other speedy criteria, may apply).
Please stop using G4 as a reason for deleting articles which were re-created after being speedied. OdMishehu 11:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
When I made the deletion, I checked the log and it appeared to have been deleted several times under the same criterion, and wasn't really aware of that particular detail of G4. I've took the time before making this reply to do a full thorough read of WP:CSD again to pick up on any details that I've missed, and to avoid conflicts like these again. I'm sorry for any problems my mistakes could have caused. Spebi 04:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
My message
Hello Spebi. Thank you for the suggestions. I didn't send those messages in bad faith. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 06:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the reply. I hope will we meet again in the future. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 06:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
My report that was removed
I reported an IP address that has been vandalizing a page even after a warning. I'm wondering why action was not taken. Enigmaman (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
It would help if you provided the IP that was removed, then I could possibly review the case and take action. Spebi 04:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I guess the editor is referring to this reporting of two IPs (likely the same editor), one of which was blocked, and the article was semi-protected, so the report was removed for the second IP. Hope that gives some background! Ariel♥Gold 04:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Ariel :) It appears that the first IP you reported was removed because it had already been blocked, and the next IP address that you reported was later removed due to the article being vandalised being semi-protected. Hopefully this makes things a bit clearer. Spebi 04:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thanks for the explanation. The reason I asked you about it is because you were the one to remove my report from the project page. Enigmaman (talk) 04:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
P.S. Spebi, I hope you don't mind my butting into the conversation, lol. I just figured it would be helpful to give some diffs ;) Ariel♥Gold 05:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Don't mind at all. I wouldn't have been able to explain what I did to Enigmaman without your diffs. Thanks :) Spebi 05:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Welcome!WikiProject Australia is a WikiProject, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. This newsletter exists simply to notify Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events within the project and relating to Australia on Wikipedia.
Durova is still accepting new members of the project that qualify for the award, so if you qualify, add your name and your articles (remembering they can't be articles already taken) to the list.
Controversial articles debated controversially
Subsequent to the Australian federal election, 2007, an edit war sparked on the Australia article, debating over whether newly-elected Labor leader Kevin Rudd had earned prime minister status yet over current Prime Minister John Howard. The debate died down after protection was applied to the page, but later sparked the creation of another article, entitled Prime Minister-elect. The AfD for the article continues today.
An article pertaining to the Australian federal election for 2010 was created, and later debated at another AfD. Some argued that the article was purely speculation, and that the article was a clear violation of WP:CRYSTAL, a variation of Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, which states that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and shouldn't be used for speculating about a subject or articles that predict future events. The article was later retitled to Australian federal election, 2011, after new evidence came to light regarding the election being scheduled for that year.
This month's newsletter was written by Spebi and published by ~. If you wish to stop receiving it, receive it in a different format, or submit items for consideration next month, see our co-ordination page.Issue 1, Volume 1, December 2007. See [[newsletter archives]] for previous issues. You can also view this issue directly [[here]]
Quality watch
Yet another crowning took place on the project in the past month – November 2007 was officially crowned by members of the project as "Australian FA" month. No less than seven articles were promoted to featured article status last month making it the month with the highest amount of article promotions the project has seen since its creation. Among the seven brilliant articles promoted in November were Variegated Fairy-wren, Dream Days at the Hotel Existence, Ian Chappell, 1999 Sydney hailstorm, Karmichael Hunt, Arthur Morris and Powderfinger. Hopefully more articles to come. Big congratulations to all who contributed – you're doing a great job.
We are currently aiming to have 100GAs by the end of the year!
This newsletter is a monthly newsletter with details relating to events and happenings within the Australian Wikipedian community and WikiProject Australia. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or receive it in a different format, relist your name appropriately at the subscription page. Delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC).
Yo, Sebzorz...you own this DVD, right? I was wondering if you could find a few more sources/interviews/somethings - it's dangerously close to GA level. Cheers, —Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
It's sitting on my shelf and I'm staring at it right now :) There's an interview with Jack McCoy that I haven't watched, I'll take a look and take down some notes, and there's also a couple of photo galleries. Go on gtalk, later :) Spebi 04:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm thinking the interview would be helpful. On gtalk now. —Dihydrogen Monoxide 05:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello. The deletion of diggeh I feel was unmerited. Multiple individuals took a hand in editing it. While there has been low activity with the site, it is undergoing enormous alterations as we speak and has been adopted by a major Iranian non-profit organization as instrumental in an outreach campaign. It just needs a little more time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.179.249.147 (talk) 01:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I deleted the page Diggeh under speedy deletion criteriaA7 and G11. The article failed to assert the importance of the subject (A7), in this case, it failed to meet any of the criteria for inclusion outlined on Wikipedia:Notability (web), and the article appeared to me to be an advertisement (G11). If you are willing to rewrite the article, with an assertion of notability and writing it in a way that doesn't make it sound like an advertisement, I'd be happy to restore the page. Thank you, Spebi 04:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Hello Spebi. Thanks for your comments in October in the peer review for North West England. I followed all your advice, and it recently achieved FPO status. I appreciate your willigness to involve yourself in portals, even when not necessarily having the time to do so. Thank you once again. Regards, — RudgetContributions 16:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations. The portal has improved for the better. Good work :) Spebi 05:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Templates for deletion - orphaning
I noticed you closed a few tfd discussions, but did not orphan the templates. If a template is still in use, it should be added to the "Completed discussions" at the bottom of the templates for deletion page. Thanks. --- RockMFR 17:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, sorry about that. I'll remember it for next time :) Spebi 04:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Acrassicauda
Are you the one who deleted Acrassicauda artcle? if yes can you please explain me why? the article can be found in sister wikipedias in other langauges[10][11]. Also Google search gives you at least 10000 search results.--Aziz1005 (talk) 20:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Spebi. Could you please revert the deleted article in order to make it easier for me to edit and expand that article.--Aziz1005 (talk) 12:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Spebi, No I'm not a member of the band and I am not related in any way to this band apart from being half Iraqi :) Thanks you for your quick respond and profissional way of dealing with the issue.--Aziz1005 (talk) 21:37, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you mentioned on the WikiProject Alternative Music COTW page that you'd be interested in formatting the links on Oasis (band). If you're still interested, that'd be much appreciated. Also, remove any dodgy refs you might come across (there looks to be a few). I'm handling the print sourcing. If we keep it up, we might be able to nominate the article at GAC by the time this week's collaboration ends on Thursday morning. WesleyDodds (talk) 08:33, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
I'll see what I can do. Spebi 04:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry about that. I saw the "3" in the time stamp as a "5" and KnowledgeOfSelf's warning was one minute before. I apologize and will be more careful in the future. Thank you very much for your note. --SimpleParadox 23:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks buddy. I will keep any future reports concise and in proper format. Guldenat (talk) 07:05, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Continious personal attacks
OK, I'm gonna chill. But I have a right to revert personal attacks. I do not want this person on my talk page. I do not want people to bully my hard efforts, this is distressing for me, all the hard work i've done for this site. Alientraveller (talk) 22:08, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
I know that you deleted page 2 of my userpage without even me noticing. (Read hidden comment: ***Hey! Why are you editing my page? You better not change anything or I will spill milk on your pretty dress! >:-(*** -->
) iXela talk 00:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Came with the article (lol), ask Linca if he remembers where he got most of the charting stuff when he created the article. Spebi 08:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
no moar nonsens on mi pg pls. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Riana (talk • contribs) 21:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Timestamp on Riana's Talk Page
Thanks! :) I am not sure why me "nowiki-ing" that one section goofed up when she put ~~~~. Oddness. Take Care and Merry Christmas...NeutralHomerT:C 21:21, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Long ago an article I created about another TWN person was deleted. However, that was because the person was no longer an on-call producer on the TWN site, so the source was no longer avalible. However, I never got notified about this prod, and didn't know the article got deleted until now. Could you show me the reason and contents of the prod? Also, could someone notify me when one of my articles is put up for prod? Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 02:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
The PROD reason given was "Non notable weather presenter", and the tag was placed by Nuttah (talk·contribs) on December 2, 2007. When I deleted the article, the proposed deletion time had expired and there were no contests to the deletion. If you want, I can temporarily restore the page if you have a need for a particular part of it, or provide you the whole contents as they were when they were deleted by e-mail, but to have the page restored back to normal, you will have to list it at Wikipedia:Deletion review and follow the methods there. As for the lack of notification, it's a necessary step for the proposing editor, as it would seem unfair to the author not to have a say in it, however, I'm not really sure that a notice of deletion is usually handed out. Cheers, Spebi 03:44, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Why is this particular article non-notable? I've created other articles about TWN broadcasters, but that was only because some of the other broadcasters already had articles. So, I created the new ones. If the overall topic of TWN broadcasters were not notable enough, why did the original ones get the articles in the first place? Do the broadcasters all have to have some major achivement, and is that something this person in particular doesn't have? Is it only because this article had been deleted more than once previously, and someone watching it that had seen it previously deleted saw it pop up again, and said it was unnotable? The article for Michelle Jobin which was previously deleted was deleted because the only reference had expired. Should the articles have a source other than just their TWN page to ensure their notability? Also, I'm rather new to deletion review, but I'll go see what it's about. I've heard rumours that it doesn't work, but I'll go see what it is anyway. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 14:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately I was not involved in proposing the deletion at all, but I did make the deletion when it was time for it to be made, but when I checked up on it, no apparent attempts to contest the proposal had been made. I strongly suggest talking to Nuttah further about this matter rather than myself. If you do decide to reincarnate the article through Deletion review, I suggest you create the page in a user subpage to move into the main namespace if consensus is to overturn the deletion and rewrite the article. This also allows people who comment in the debate to see what the article will look like and will it differ from the old deleted version. If you do decide to do this, I strongly suggest you read Wikipedia:Notability (people) and its criteria to see if Natalie Thomas does satisfy it, and if she does, the article must state it. This is quite an important stage in rewriting deleted articles as you need to convince those in the debate that an article on Natalie Thomas is needed in Wikipedia. Spebi 21:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Got it, thanks :) Spebi 09:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Have you tried to make use of it at all? It recently hasn't really been working for me.... :( -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 21:52, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
I tried last night and it said that delete.cs couldn't be found and some other type of error... I don't think I followed the instructions correctly though, so mistake on my part :) Spebi 21:53, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
I see... you have to save the delete notepad file as a .cs file beforehand, you do have to specify, try that.... -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I did that, there wasn't a delete.txt in there... there's definitely a delete.cs, I'll have another look in a minute. Spebi 22:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
The FrugalReader page has been deleted and forced from being recreated, even though it was only deleted once. I feel that this page should be undeleted and back to the state it was before deletion.
It is much like PaperBackSwap, which has been online for the same amount of time.
It has been offering Author Spotlights, which is not offered by any other book trading site (to my knowledge).
It is fairly well known, with about 2,000 members.
I ask you to revert the page back to its original state before deletion.
I deleted FrugalReader (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) because the article failed to assert the importance of the subject, in other words, the article didn't say why the the subject met our notability guidelines for web content, Wikipedia:Notability (web). I urge you to read this page as it contains important guidelines for articles about web content and though the website may merit inclusion in Wikipedia, the article needs to state why. And for the record, the page was deleted three times before previously before I had deleted it recently (see deletion log), and so I protected it from recreation, although I can remove the protection so you can rewrite the article up to standard with Wikipedia:Notability (web) and hopefully not have it deleted again. Thank you for your understanding in this matter. Spebi 03:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
I've been busy with other things recently and my Internet connection hasn't been the best so I apologise for my lateness. Spebi 20:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
I apologise for the lateness in my response to your query. I have viewed User:Ksax/FrugalReader and come to the conclusion that from the information and sources provided in it may not satisfy notability criteria. The article provides two sources, the first is this article from SmartMoney; which explains some of the basic details of FrugalReader. A criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia is significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, but this excludes sources that state "a brief summary of the nature of the content or the publication of Internet addresses and site" – quote from Wikipedia:Notability (web). The second source provided, an article about online book sharing from USATODAY.com, contains merely a quote from FrugalReader's CEO. I'm afraid that it does not appear that the FrugalReader site is notable, but if it is, the article in your subpage does not state if it is, and why. Spebi 21:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello Spebi, I personally don't know anything about Powderfinger, so my comments could be somewhat limited to portal aspects.
Have you tried adding more articles? You can add the remaining GAs that you haven't added. As for pictures, you can definetely try commons:Category:Powderfinger and at least double the # of what you have currently.
I am planning to revamp the featured portal candidates which will effective starting 2008. If you wish to nominate this portal, you should do so now or wait until 2008 to avoid the confusion caused during the transition. OhanaUnitedTalk page 05:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
I suppose that could be okay, I can see a heap that we can use. As for nominating it, I think I'll wait until next year, I don't really want to rush the whole thing. Thanks for your insight, though Spebi 08:39, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
If you still need the help, I could give you some thoughts–nothing brilliant mind. :) Rt. 12:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Newsletter
hi there Spebi. I propose we start an interview section each month where we interview an Aussie Wikipedian, preferably an obscure person who has done a lot of work but is not well known or famous, so that everyone can get to know them. First off, I would propose Phanto282 (talk·contribs) a cricket editor that is not well known outside WP:CRIC but has done a lot of work. He has written (basically by himself): Donald Bradman, Alan Kippax, Lindsay Hassett, chuck Fleetwood-Smith, Ian Chappell and Greg Chappell (or under his IP) and probably a few others as well. Seeing as I already know his work it might be better if you did this interview, else my ramblings might make it a bit too detailed for the non cricket tragics. Regards, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:08, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Nice idea :) I'll see if I can get in touch with him over the next few days. Spebi 08:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Maybe we could alternate and do one like that and then a bigshot, like Blnguyen *ducks* :) Daniel 12:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to see us interview some bigshots too - they sometimes have an interesting perspective to give. For the not-so-wellknown users, I can't really think of any (any I do, you'll already know as you wikistalk me so much!)...but if we look through some of the new GA logs etc. I'm sure we could pick up some of the quality contributors from there. —Dihydrogen Monoxide(Review) 23:12, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Archiving featured portals candicacy
Hi Spebi, Thanks for archiving Ireland portal's featured candicacy. But, I would like to say that, it could be better, once you ensure that each and every single comment has been properly addressed. I added three comments, but was addressed one. It takes long time to review the portal and add a comment, how it can be improved. Regards, Shyam(T/C) 10:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I can see where I messed up... I agree with you on the fact that it does take a long time to review, and I don't think that this process should be one to be rushed or have measures in place to speed it up. I can either re-open the candicacy for you and close it after those particular comments have been addressed and rejudge the consensus, or I can leave it and remember this for next time (it'll stick in my head and scream quite loud when I'm closing it). For the record, your note about the portal's category header had been fixed, the Did you know image fixed, and the image enlargement may have something to do with this discussion. Thanks for the advice, though, I really won't forget it for next time. Spebi 20:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Spebi, Thanks for your reply. I do not think, this would be better to reopen this discussion. Anyhow, the concensus will reach to get the Featured portal status. Please take care of all the issues listed there, if possible. Thanks again, Shyam(T/C) 05:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
You removed this without asking. The Nortel Portal group, is developing many new pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HammondJr (talk • contribs) 15:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
I thought it was inactive and didn't see the use of having an unused shortcut to an inactive page when it could be used elsewhere, but it appears that you are still developing the page. I didn't realise this, and so I went and redirected the page to a portal I was working on. I'm sorry for any trouble I've caused. Spebi 20:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Concerning 141.197.10.180
The final warning was given yesterday, not today. Is this warning invalid? Postoak (talk) 21:35, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
No, this particular warning isn't invalid, however, since the vandal you reported edited over half an hour before you reported, we cannot take action on the report. Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism is a noticeboard not for silly old vandals, but for active vandals. The information under the header "Important - please read" is there to be read, not to be ignored, and is to help users by informing them of when to report and when to not. In turn, this helps everyone working on the board. Thanks. Spebi 21:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
It wasn't ignored. If you don't want to take action, fine. However there should be a definition of what is considered active with respect to these reports because it isn't clearly defined at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Are they no longer active after 10 minutes? 20 minutes? This user has been vandalizing the article for several days now. Thanks, Postoak (talk) 21:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Active as in the past few minutes, and I will define this in the header in a moment. IP addresses, unless static, almost always reassign themselves to another user so placing blocks on vandals who haven't edited for several days, for example, would be a damaging method instead of a preventative method, which is what it is intended to be. If the user you are encountering vandalises again after the final warning (which was at 21:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)), make another report and I'm sure that the user will be blocked. I'll be watching the user's contributions closely over the next few hours to see if they do decide to return. Spebi 22:04, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I'm dropping you a note because you are listed on Wikipedia:Protected titles/Specific Admin as an admin that is maintaining a personal SALT page. Recent software updates now allow deleted pages to be protected just like other pages. Please consider migrating any pages on your personal list to normal protections, and clearing them off of your list. There still may be situations where a personal list may be the best way to handle a page though. Thank you, — xaosfluxTalk 02:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Do we have to play semantics? This person logged on and all of his/her edits were vandalism. That, to me, is an all-vandalism account. If you have a better term for it, please share. If you want to protect it, be my guest. But I wasn't suggesting an indef block, just one to slow the kid down. At the moment it appears to be moot, so it's all good. Unless he comes back. CheersTvoz|talk 07:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
You're clearly missing the point here. The user you reported was an IP address, not a registered account, and to use the term "vandalism only account" or similar is misleading and incorrect. Although it seems like just a term, it really isn't, as the blocks placed on accounts and blocks placed on IP addresses strongly differ; most IP addresses aren't static and are often reassigned to different users, and so a long (for example, indefinite block) block will most likely not affect the intended user indefinitely. Accounts are intended to be for one person, and will never be reassigned to other people, and so the blocks can be indefinite. As for the report you made, it appears that the user had not vandalised after a final warning as there wasn't one, and so cannot be blocked due to being unsufficiently warned. And blocks are meant to be used as preventative methods, not those to punish users. Cheers, Spebi 07:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I am completely aware that it was not a registered account, and as I said above I wasn't suggesting an indefinite block, just a short-term block to interrupt the repeated vandalism that had been going on this evening, clearly by one person, after reverts and warnings. And I realized afterward that Nlu was correct that I had given a level 3 not 4 as I thought, as I said on his talk page, although the warning after mine should have been a level 4 because there were 4 more vandalisms after my level 3 warning, and at that time it wasn't clear that the vandal was finished. I was not trying to punish, I was hoping to prevent further damage to the articles he was attacking at that time. As I said - it's all good, assuming he doesn't come back. Tvoz|talk —Preceding comment was added at 08:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Dear Seb26, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind support on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (72/19/6).
Now that I am a sysop, do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.
Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. — Etalk 12:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
ACOTF
Thanks for updating the link on the ACOTF template, much appreciated! --Canley (talk) 10:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Spebi! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 03:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate, that landed on WP:100! I paid close attention to everything that was said, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because it's the holiday season and there are plenty of off-wiki distractions. :) I'm also working my way through the Wikipedia:New admin school and double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools. My main goals are to help out with various backlogs, but I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are several more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status! Thanks again, and have a good New Year, --Elonka 22:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
T:UE-R1
The redirect T:UE-R1 has been nominated for deletion. --- RockMFR 23:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
Congratulations, please help with more improvements
Spebi, congratulations in your new role as a featured portal co-director. I look forward to your continued efforts to help improve Wikipedia's portal namespace. Along those lines, I am asking for your help. Please take a look at the portal peer review for Contents and megaportals. Just like adding featured portal co-directors, it is a part of a larger portal namespace improvement drive. All of your comments, suggestions and participation in this improvement effort will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, RichardF (talk) 15:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
I've closed the Tasmanian Portal FPOC as unsuccessful. Be sure to bring it back there in a month, it's definitely a good portal, worthy of FPO status for sure. Best regards, Rt. 20:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
I realised it was unsuccessful because it could not be successful because I had already withdrawn it. Thanks anyway. Spebi 20:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
I know, but just for the record. :) Rt. 20:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Dear friend, I hope you had a wonderful New Year's Eve, and that 2008 is your best year yet! ~ Riana ⁂ 02:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative music December 2007 Newsletter
"He didn't really talk until he got his girlfriend, and somehow that jump-started his ego, and he went from 'I am Lou, I am nothing' to 'I am the greatest.' He just went ffffft, just flipped the scales. And then he started talking a lot. And then I was realizing from a lot of the things he was saying, 'Hmmm, maybe I don't like Lou.'"- J Mascis
Starting this month, the newsletter will contain a new feature that lists a recommended alternative rock album for project members to check out and help expand their knowledge of the genre. This month's "Recommended Alternative Album" is Archers of Loaf - Icky Mettle (1993).
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 05:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC) .
happy Mango season
'TIS MANGO SEASON.... Have a shlice of mango cheek...well, I am up to my armpits in the things. Yuletide means lots and lots of mangos, as well as turkey and ham and ice-cream and pressies. Were on special so I bought 3 crates for AU$20 and now I have both crispers in the refrigerator full and even with everyone eating two of the ##$@& things every mealtime... I am a bit mangoed out so I thought I'd spread the goodwill around....cheers, Casliber (talk·contribs) 05:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year
Dear Spebi, I hope you had a wonderful New Year's Day, and that 2008 brings further success, health and happiness! ...and further powderfingercr... and nationalist conquests ;) .... ~ Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
See Portal talk:Featured content#move to portal namespace. I actually planned to move the other featured content related portals from Wikipedia to Portal namespace soon too, as proposed at their talk pages a wile ago. Cheers, —Ruud 20:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I only support if I see that the articles are fit for featured article status. I'll have a quick look at them later, I'm in the middle of something else right now. Spebi 21:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Spebi, I think I've assuaged your concerns at the FAC. Would you mind taking another look? Thanks so much for your helpful commentary. Regards, Keilanatalk(recall) 01:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I'll take another look when my mind is free from Powderfinger bias. Good work so far, though. Spebi 01:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Muahaha...your mind is never free :P —Dihydrogen Monoxide 01:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! You're being assimilated... Keilanatalk(recall) 01:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
If you've got a spare minute, I think that we've taken care of all your concerns. Thanks so much for the in-depth review! Regards, Keilanatalk(recall) 23:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned talk pages
Hey, your message got lost on my talk page. Thanks for cleaning out that list, and happy new year! east.718at 02:14, January 2, 2008
Welcome!WikiProject Australia is a WikiProject, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. This newsletter exists simply to notify Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events within the project and relating to Australia on Wikipedia.
Australian Wikimedia chapter
Wikimedia chapters are independent organisations run by Wikimedians to further promote the Wikimedia projects run by the Wikimedia Foundation, and to "empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally". This means that we in the chapter can promote Wikipedia and other Wikimedia wikis and their contributor's work in our area. Currently, a chapter for Australia is in discussion. If you're interested in helping the Wikimedia Foundation in more ways than just creating articles, and by promoting Wikipedia and other projects so people can start to read your work and become contributors, then consider adding yourself to the interested participants list at www.wikimedia.org.au
Th
e proposed chapter also has an IRC channel on the freenode network: join #wikimedia-au next time you are online. The seventh IRC meeting for Wikimedia Australia will also be held in this channel at 8 pm (AEDT-UTC+11) on January 6 (WA at 6pm, SA at 7:30pm and QLD at 7pm). For more information, visit this page.
Recent happenings
2007 has been an excellent year for WikiProject Australia and its members – a sudden rise in article quality (see "Quality watch"), more article collaboration, portal creation, gap-filling article creation, image requests fulfilled, newsletter writing and award awarding. Success!
Portals and "topics" go hand in hand (not really), and many within the project and throughout Wikipedia aspire to achieve featured topic status for a particular topic. Goals to promote all capital cities to featured status, and among others, a Powderfinger featured topic, and a featured topic on The Invincibles cricket team. It's for sure that 2008 will be filled with Aussie pride, so hang in there with those flags, everyone! Especially on Australia Day, *hints surprises* :)
Of course, writing featured articles and making up clever hooks for use on "Did you know" isn't the only way to contribute. Many users contribute day-in, day-out, maintaining the project and portals, tagging and assessing articles, making suggestions at featured article candidacies, coordinating collaborations within the project, responding to peer reviews, save valid articles in deletion debates, in short, the stuff that if not done, will cause the whole project as we know it to slowly deteroriate. Many users who don't qualify for awards like Durova's Triple Crown award, qualify for others.
Moondyne recognised the users who work tirelessly every day to make sure that every thing is running smoothly by introducing a new award – the Drover's Award. Initiated in December, eight users have already received an award that is set to become a prestigious award for all Australia-related topic editors; SatuSuro, Longhair,
Spebi, Moondyne, Grahamec, Mattinbgn and ScottDavis and more are sure to be awarded. If you know of any users who work tirelessly behind the scenes and have not yet been recognised for their greatly appreciated efforts, award them the Drover's Award.
This month's newsletter was written by Spebi and published by BrownBot. If you wish to stop receiving it, receive it in a different format, or submit items for consideration next month, see our co-ordination page.Issue 2, Volume 1, January 2008. See newsletter archive for previous issues, or view this issue directly.
2007 saw a major feat for WikiProject Australia: one hundred articles were promoted to good article status. This is huge not only for the project's individual members and those who helped achieved such an impressive statistic, but for the whole of Wikipedia. Everyone involved has given readers from all around the world a chance to learn about Australia and relevant topics from the best of sources available on the Internet. A huge congratulations to all involved. And congratulations to Underneath-it-All, who wrote "2 Hearts", which passed as a good article, officially making him WikiProject Australia's "Good Article Centurian" and the article the one hundredth Australia-related article to be promoted to good article status at any one time.
Speaking of statistics nearing the number 100, WikiProject Australia has also seen an increase of the number of articles being promoted to featured article status. In November last year, seven articles were promoted, earning the month its official title of "Featured article month" of WikiProject Australia, and making it the month with the highest featured article achievement. Viva la featured article revolution! Also seeing some activity were featured portals – many have already been promoted, and a wave of excellently-crafted ones hitting our shores very soon.
End of year statistics
Here are some statistics for WikiProject Australia produced by Blnguyen and his Assessment Monkey of 2007's good article and featured article promotions. Summing it up: 71 featured articles, and 106 good articles.
Australia-related featured article production
Australia-related good article production
This newsletter is a monthly newsletter with details relating to events and happenings within the Australian Wikipedian community and WikiProject Australia. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or receive it in a different format, relist your name appropriately at the subscription page. Delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC).
Candidates for Deletion
Hello, I just finished talking to jj137♠ about a page he deleted, "My Michelle", by Guns N' Roses. I was pretty upset when I found out the page was deleted, because that's one of my favorite Guns songs, and it had a lot of info on it, which is hard to track down on the internet. He undeleted it for me, but said that he only deleted it because it's tag was expired; he had nothing to do with tagging it in the first place, and said I should voice my concerns to you.
Keeping that in mind, the tag said it was proposed for deletion because it lacked "notability". This is what I wrote him regarding that:
Firstly, it is a song from what is undisputed considered a landmark album. While I am not very familiar with the official policies on album articles, it is certainly an unofficial convention that just about every song from a landmark album is considered notable due to its presence on said album. Just because it wasn't released as a single doesn't mean it is not notable. Please see The Dark Side of the Moon or pretty much any Beatles album for examples. Secondly, disregarding the "landmark album" angle, it is a song that is rather famous for its content. The story behind the song is famous and has intrigued many people; just do a Google search for the story behind it. Thirdly, following logic similar to the second reason, it is simply a loved song. I know from viewing pages on the internet and just my own experience with friends and other fans that this song is very popular, and deleting the page does a great disservice to any fan that wants to learn more about it.
Finally, I'd just like to say that whether or not a song is from a notable album or whatever, Wikipedia has becomes a great resource for fans of just about anything: video games, music, movies, whatever. When an article such as this is deleted, it really does a great disservice to fans who are just skimming and looking for info: the type of people that aren't active and don't participate in Wikipedia maintenance or what have you, but still make up a very large portion of the user base. I would ask that that be kept in mind when looking at potential articles to be deleted, when they relate to a cultural (and ESPECIALLY musical) matter. I mean, if Wikipedia is really hurting to get rid of some pages, there are plenty of absolutely useless import model pages laying around. But of course, I suppose that's all in the eye of the beholder.
Hi GrimmC. Jj is right, his part in the deletion was minimal despite the fact he actually made the deletion. I proposed that the article be deleted because there were no claims of notability in it. This does not mean that the song is not notable, full stop. This means that I could not find any part of the article that meets a single criterion in Wikipedia:Notability (music) (which I strongly recommend you read). My grandma may be the oldest superstar in Hollywood but everyone knows her under a completely different name – if I was to write an article about her and just put "she is my grandma", it would be obvious that the subject is not notable; however, she clearly is notable, yet the article has not said anything about her being a superstar. Articles need to say why they are notable, or face being presumed to be non-notable. You see how this works?
I'm not sure about unofficial conventions on other websites, but our official conventions are listed on Wikipedia:Notability (music). The unofficial convention of "every song from a landmark album is considered notable due to its presence on said album" will not apply here. If you find that the song "My Michelle" meets any of the criteria on Wikipedia:Notability (music), in particular, criterion 1: "It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable", then I advise you to tell me about this.
I know it seems like it is important to have a base of all music-related information and all that other stuff, but we can't just create articles over nothing and expect people to consider them to be reliable. It's true, we're trying to build a comprehensive encyclopedia. But we're also trying to make it a reliable encyclopedia. If we were to be as comprehensive as comprehensive gets, would you want to read through thousands of articles about your virtually-unknown neighbours and include totally inaccurate information? If you have been paying attention to technology-related news in the past few years you would know that Wikipedia isn't considered to be the top source for information when researching a topic on something that Wikipedia covers, especially considering the fact that anyone can change any detail without providing any source whatsoever, and can do it without anyone immediately knowing who they are. We're trying to build a comprehensive encyclopedia here, but at the same time we are trying to make it a reliable encyclopedia.
I've had another look at the article and have noted that no sources whatsoever have been used in the article. I'm not particularly sure about the other criteria and if the track meets them, so I'll leave that up to you to decide. Basically, by that guideline, singles are automatically considered to be notable, yet other tracks are different. This passage is from the guideline I keep citing in my reply to you:
Most songs do not merit an article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for a prominent album or for the artist who wrote or prominently performed the song. Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; permanent stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album.
I am willing to give you another chance to rewrite the article My Michelle. If you can find reliable sources, and I can't stress this enough, reliable sources that verify the claims in the article about the subject or find that the song charted highly on major charts or won significant awards, feel free to rewrite the article from scratch (if you want, I personally find it easier to work from scratch and know what you're writing rather than to improve with all existing text polluting your mental workspace) and include these claims. If you're not particularly sure what counts as a reliable sources, check out Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability.
I'm not trying to wipe out all articles that aren't sourced or aren't blatantly notable. I'm trying to do my best for the project. If you do need help with the article at any time, you can contact me and I'll do my best to try and help. Spebi 21:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Right-o. I hear ya on the notability thing--it rather annoys me when I read an article that has no sources. It just upsets me when articles are outright deleted. Fortunately, I happen to have a copy of Slash's autobiography at arm's length, so it will be no problem at all to add in a reliable source. In fact, that's how I discovered the article was deleted to begin with--I've been going through all the Guns N' Roses articles I have reliable info on and have been updated/adding sources to them. I'll check it out in a moment. Just as soon as I'm done reading the notability guidelines, heh.
Okay, so I read the guidelines and re-wrote the article a little bit, but not too much because I already liked its format. But most importantly I added some new info and found some sources for the various claims it makes. Hopefully this will be acceptable.
Wow, great work so far! :) I'll do my best to track down some other sources to help out. Thanks for your co-operation in the matter. Spebi 00:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jj, just letting you know that perhaps it is better to notify the proposed deleter of an article that you are going to restore it. It is not really required, however, it is probably better in the long run to let people know of things related to them or their actions. Just a friendly reminder. Cheers, Spebi 21:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Oops, sorry about that. I usually remember; I told him he could contact you but forgot to do so myself. Again, sorry! jj137♠ 23:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
As the closing admin for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armless, what would you suggest should be done with Category:Bethany Hamilton albums, also mentioned in the discussion? I apparently have to wait four days before tagging an empty category for speedy deletion, but that seems pointless -- there is no evidence Bethany Hamilton will be launching a music career -- but at the same time, the category seems to have been (mistakenly) created in good faith as a response to the creation of the hoax article, so it can't properly be considered vandalism. --Popplewick (talk) 10:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
I think it would be better if we just sit the 4 days out on this one. The category doesn't meet any other CSD criterion but putting it through a CfD debate would be pointless. . Spebi 22:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. --Popplewick (talk) 08:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Iceland's portal peer review
Hello Spebi. Since you've been a recent portal peer reviewer, I request your input at the Iceland Portal's peer review. All general feedback is greatly appreciated. Thanks! [sd] 13:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I've made a few comments, not many though. Spebi 22:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
RFPP
I actually have a lovely script that does that for me, quite handy really. It also puts in the AFD templates. Keilanatalk(recall) 22:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Enjoy, I'm probably one of the only admins who uses Twinkle 'cause something screwed up my rollback and I don't know enough Java to fix it. :S Keilanatalk(recall) 22:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I keep it around for RC patrolling, namely that nice "Rollback AGF" feature. Can I take a peek at your monobook? Keilanatalk(recall) 22:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hmm, I think I have all that you've got except that block thing, and I usually write my own block messages. Take what you want from my monobook, you'll probably find a lot of it useful. Keilanatalk(recall) 22:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Regarding the signature oppose
I would like to personally thank you for defending my position, even when not asked. But I've left a comment there, just before it grows into something uncontrollable. Regards, Rudget. 21:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
All good. Comments like that are totally unnecessary. Spebi 02:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Blocking vandal
Hi, I'd just like to take a moment to thank you for promptly blocking the fellow who kept vandalizing my user page. I wasn't sure if posting the report on AIV was the correct response on my part, so I'm glad that you took care of it. Thanks again for the immediate response. Lazulilasher (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the helpful review! I would like notify you that the Iceland Portal has now been nominated for featured status. Comments and suggestions are welcome at the discussion. Thank you, [sd] 02:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello again, I was wondering if you could review the article for "November Rain" to see if the two things it is tagged with (not enough references and weasel words) could be removed. Also, if you could appraise it for the Guns N' Roses project, that'd be cool too. (Unless it doesn't need another appraisal.)
Thanks for jumping in with the ((underconstruction)) template. Truly appreciated :D E_dog95' Hi ' 23:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello
I was told I missed you on IRC by all of three minutes. Apologies for the linking, I meant no harm by it. Mønobi 02:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
RFPP
I actually have a lovely script that does that for me, quite handy really. It also puts in the AFD templates. Keilanatalk(recall) 22:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Enjoy, I'm probably one of the only admins who uses Twinkle 'cause something screwed up my rollback and I don't know enough Java to fix it. :S Keilanatalk(recall) 22:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I keep it around for RC patrolling, namely that nice "Rollback AGF" feature. Can I take a peek at your monobook? Keilanatalk(recall) 22:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hmm, I think I have all that you've got except that block thing, and I usually write my own block messages. Take what you want from my monobook, you'll probably find a lot of it useful. Keilanatalk(recall) 22:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Regarding the signature oppose
I would like to personally thank you for defending my position, even when not asked. But I've left a comment there, just before it grows into something uncontrollable. Regards, Rudget. 21:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
All good. Comments like that are totally unnecessary. Spebi 02:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Blocking vandal
Hi, I'd just like to take a moment to thank you for promptly blocking the fellow who kept vandalizing my user page. I wasn't sure if posting the report on AIV was the correct response on my part, so I'm glad that you took care of it. Thanks again for the immediate response. Lazulilasher (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the helpful review! I would like notify you that the Iceland Portal has now been nominated for featured status. Comments and suggestions are welcome at the discussion. Thank you, [sd] 02:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello again, I was wondering if you could review the article for "November Rain" to see if the two things it is tagged with (not enough references and weasel words) could be removed. Also, if you could appraise it for the Guns N' Roses project, that'd be cool too. (Unless it doesn't need another appraisal.)
Could you please change the protection on User talk:66.27.80.180 from semi protection to full protection? Jman5 (talk·contribs) admits to being the puppet master of the account and is continually reverting back to the abusive version. Corvus cornixtalk 05:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you SO MUCH for your support in my unanimous RFA. Take this cookie as a small token of my appreciation.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 06:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Blocked?
Nikhta's been blocked? WHEW! And I will withdraw it immediately. Thanks for telling me! --Gp75motorsportsREV LIMITER 01:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Well, that's curious. I checked, but last time I checked, it wasn't an indef. I don't know how that happened, maybe my computer made an error while loading. My bad. Also, I've placed a {{RESOLVED}} tag on the ARBCOM case. --Gp75motorsportsREV LIMITER 01:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Heh, yeah, I will. I won't do another "hey-everyone-freak-out-and-notify-Jimbo-'cuz-Wikipedia's-coming-to-an-end"-type deal. --Gp75motorsportsREV LIMITER 01:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
You are correct, Kiwi Jays Amazing Race is indeed under construction. However, it is a chart showing amusing personal details of someone's life as best I can tell. I am fairly certain that the author is just goofing around. —Noah 22:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
The page was also previously deleted December 8th and the contributor has just created Kiwi Jays The Amazing Race, for what it is worth. Cheers. —Noah 22:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I've deleted Kiwi Jays Amazing Race under A1, anyway, it appears that it had met that criterion. Spebi 22:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. Perhaps some day Kiki Jay will actually paste in all the results of the race on the first edit and we can find out who won. ;-) —Noah 22:40, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
You left the tag on yesterday. Are you done? Ta. --rm 'w avu 02:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm done, just forgot to remove it ;) Spebi 05:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Header change Artisol2345...
No spebi, that was right, it SHOULD have been Artisol2345, unless there was another reason for reverting the change you made... (it came up in my watchlisted stuff...) Edit Centric (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I fixed it now. I thought that it had something to do with the page not transcluding on the main RFCU page, but apparently it wasn't related. Thanks for alerting me :) Spebi 06:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Not a prob, glad to give the assist, anytime! Edit Centric (talk) 07:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
Cascading protection
Beware when using cascading protection, as it not only protects the most immediately transcluded page (e.g., your archives), but also every other article and template, image, or other media included in it and below it (i.e., it would fully protect any template or image that occurs in any of your archives-- regardless of where it occurs) --slakr\ talk / 23:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm gonna go ahead and disable it temporarily, as I'm not sure just what might be effected by it. Heh, I was trying to find an example, so I had to crawl through your archives... try editing Wikipedia:WikiProject_Alternative_music/Newsletter/December 2007, for example. :P --slakr\ talk / 23:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Cascading is tough stuff, has to be used only when necessary ;) Thanks for removing it, I think I'll just have to apply manual protection to each page. I suppose I could just substitute all templates I use on the archives, but I don't really think that would be the best approach to the problem. Thanks again :) Spebi 23:38, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Okay, pages all individually protected with cascading turned off. Thanks again for notifying me Spebi 23:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I received a message on my talk page asking me if I would unprotect User talk:Lollipop-3. Of course I wasn't going to accede to such a request (banned users don't need talk pages! :)) but I noticed that in fact it's no longer protected. You probably know better than me whether protection is required or not, and I don't know if it was removed intentionally or accidentally. I'm not at all bothered, just letting you know in case it was a mistake. Thanks. --kingboyk (talk) 01:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm looking at the logs now at it appears to be protected until January 2009, which is when Lollipop-3's block (and/or ban?) will expire. I think it is an accepted convention to redirect a user's talk page to their user page when they are banned, and or indefinitely blocked, because a), they won't need it like you said, and b) to avoid confusion. The page was already protected when I redirected it. As it stands, I see no reason to have the protection lifted. Cheers, Spebi 01:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Ah... the talk page is protected, the user page isn't (which it redirects to). That's what threw me. Agree there's no reason to lift protection. Thanks! --kingboyk (talk) 23:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi! You must be kidding! Is there anything sensible about that article? Haal (and not Hahl) in Persian is the slang term for having fun. I do not see anything encyclopedic about that, neither it is worth having an article in English Wikipedia. Siba (talk) 14:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Although I'm not particularly sure whether an article belongs here about it, I know for sure that it can't be deleted through speedy deletion. WP:CSD#G1, which is the criterion for deleting "nonsense" things, states, "Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content." It goes on to state that the following are not included: "poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, badly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes of any sort; some of these, however, may be deleted as vandalism in blatant cases". The Hahl article does not meet G1 at all, which is why I declined its speedy deletion. However, this does not mean the end of the road for deletion. If you still have a problem with the article, I suggest you either list it at Articles for deletion (debated for up to 5 days, or whenever a consensus is reached, by the community) or propose its deletion through PROD (the article will be tagged for deletion [not speedy] and if no one contests within a 5 day period, it is deleted). I hope this has helped. Cheers, Spebi 20:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your informative response. It did help. Siba (talk) 02:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Blink-182
I agree with the semi-protection. It's getting hit a lot lately. Cheers, OhNoitsJamieTalk 22:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Courtesy blanking
Hi Spebi. Thanks for the support, it is much appreciated. -- Mattinbgn\talk 08:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
My apologizes. I was using Lupin, and I clicked on the wrong rollback button, and it automatically saves pages, so.... I will try to be more careful. Again, Sorry! Ohmpandya(Talk to Me...) 20:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for the misunderstanding! I was not try to revert you. I was about the click on the edit below yours to rollback, but accidentally clicked on yours! Sorry! Ohmpandya(Talk to Me...) 20:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
A belated thank you for your RFA support! That's a nice picture of Brisbane. Archtransit (talk) 21:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations :) Thanks, I'm hoping we get in next year, and if we don't we're discussing a possible bid in 2010 for Sydney or Melbourne. Cheers, Spebi 21:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
RFA Archiving
Could you double-check your archiving at Wikipedia talk:Requests for Adminship? I think you may have removed some newer threads in favor of older ones (particularly this edit, where it's possible you copied instead of pasted. It shouldn't be a huge deal, but wanted to mention it to you directly instead of trying to fix it and - quite probably - buggering the whole thing up. Thanks! UltraExactZZClaims~ Evidence 20:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
It is quite a difficult page to archive, threads there get a lot of comments and it is hard to determine which ones are actually dead and which ones are still alive, and then you have to ensure that you haven't removed any threads you didn't have an intention to move... oh well, thanks for the heads up, it's been fixed now. ;) Spebi 21:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
To be honest, that's the main reason I mentioned it to you, as I have no idea where I'd start. It probably wouldn't have been a big deal, had I not posted a thread a few minutes before. In any event, thanks for the quick response, and for handling the page in the first place! Best, UltraExactZZClaims~ Evidence 21:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
CheckUzar
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your totally awesome, dedicated work you do as a CheckUser clerk. Incredible! - Alison❤ 21:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Alison! :) Spebi 21:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Is it me or some cases were mistakenly closed without a verdict, eg Coloane. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
There was a comment tag (<!-- -->) that made all outstanding requests be hidden, but it's fixed now so all the cases without any verdict appear properly now. Spebi 00:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Pretty cool! You wanna try and make one for Powderfinger? DihydrogenMonoxide (party) 05:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, that'd be cool. I'll see if I can make a larger one with slightly better quality for the portal, like similar to Portal:Music. Spebi 06:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm thinking it would be helpful for uniformity and maintenance if these were templated as {{award-won}} and {{award-nom}}. Has this been done before, or is there a reason not to do this? Gimmetrow 20:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
That sounds like a good idea. Perhaps we could even consider putting the whole table syntax into a separate template titled {{Award table}} or the like. I don't think anyone has ever considered doing this; I certainly haven't, and no one I worked with on the Powderfinger awards list brought it up (maybe because we didn't spend as much time on it than we did on Powderfinger discography, whose infobox was later implemented into a template). Anyway, it's a good idea and should work well. Spebi 21:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
OK, giving it a try. Gimmetrow 21:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I've tested it out here. You're welcome to revert. Original version had:
Article size: 18,441 bytes
Pre-expand include size: 126914/2048000 bytes
Post-expand include size: 65222/2048000 bytes
Template argument size: 50973/2048000 bytes
Modified version had:
Article size: 16,628 bytes
Pre-expand include size: 161753/2048000 bytes
Post-expand include size: 70776/2048000 bytes
Template argument size: 51392/2048000 bytes
Doesn't seem too bad. Gimmetrow 23:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out with semi-protecting the Gackt page. It's been the bane of my existence lately what's been going on on that page for the past few months, so I don't feel that it's over but it certainly sends a message- thanks very much. :)
(Tsukiakari (talk) 22:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC))
AfD question
Hi - I noticed you have closed the Mark Offerdahl AfD. An editor had added in Rodney Davies as part of the same discussion and I just wanted to know if that means the Mark Offerdahl AfD also covers Rodney Davies or if the article needs to go to another AfD? Many thanks, •Florrie•leave a note• 08:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
I would say for Rodney Davies to be deleted it would have to undergo another AfD. Many articles are deleted through one debate if they are in a particular series, however, this one differs, and I think it would be best if the Rodney Davies article is debated again. Spebi 08:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey there. You've expressed an interest in attending this via Skype. If you're still interested, could you please give some input on the project page as to date/time, and we'll see if we're still going to go ahead with that. Thanks, DihydrogenMonoxide (party) 07:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Aust Barnstar
The Australian Barnstar of National Merit
for your efforts with Australian articles Gnangarra 00:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Isn't there anyway I can contact Lollipop-3? I don't have her email, and I can't talk to her at all. I don't plan to really do so here, thus getting her into trouble. Which I do not want. Can you please do something? (I love entei (talk) 08:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC))
She's blocked and banned here, and she hasn't specified an e-mail address, so that rules out all possibilities of contacting her here, which means I can't do anything. Sorry. Spebi 21:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Btw I undid your edit here, because it was breaking the tagging I did before: I sometimes tag people without linking to their case (for example when the tagging occurs after an IP check). I agree the {{SockpuppetCheckuser|Vandal|Vandal}} syntax is a bit weird though, I don't know how to be able to have both. -- lucasbfrtalk 16:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Oh right, sorry. Didn't think about that... Spebi 21:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Re: Block tip
Thanks for the tip. I usually allow creation of an account because many IPs are shared by different users and blocking innocent users' ability to create accounts can cause collateral damage. Most vandals probably won't make the extra effort to create an account to continue vandalizing and if he/she does, it can be blocked too. --Hdt83Chat 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative music January 2008 Newsletter
"I still have people come up to me like, 'I really, really liked your last record.' 'Oh, thanks!' 'Are you going to do "Loser" tonight?' I'm like, 'Look, I'm six foot six. Beck is five foot sex, all right?'"- Thurston Moore
Sign up for our B-class article drive on the project talk page! The goal is to increase a number of the project's B-class articles to GA or FA status within two months. The B-class article drive will run from February 1 to April 1, 2008.
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 00:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC) .
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Spebi. No further edits should be made to this page.
FA
I saw that the number of FAs listed on the WP:ALM project wall and those listed in the project FA-class category didn't match. That usually means an article got promoted, but after a bit of comparing I noticed Wilco is missing from the wall. WesleyDodds (talk) 12:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Well played on the ALMFA template. It will certainly make updating the wall easier (which I've been avoiding), which must be a good thing. CloudNine (talk) 23:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
'Tis, it should be much easier to maintain now. Spebi 00:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Do you think you could pop onto #wikimedia-au at some stage. Brisbane 09 Q&A is running. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 03:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Do you mind?
If I use your talk page background layout? -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Nope, not at all :) I didn't make it, I borrowed it a while ago from User talk:Chris huh, with a few modifications. Spebi 00:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
RE: ATGD
Blame Giggy for it, he told me to - but yes, I should have read up on it though. Thanks again buddy. — Etalk 11:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Copy of a deleted page?
I was wondering if you'd be able to furnish me with a copy of an article that was deleted in January 2007. The article in question was Degrassi's 40 Go There-ist Moments on The-N. If it is possible, would you be able to put it in my sandbox at User:Matthewedwards/Sandbox/go there. I promise I won't restore the page, I'd just like to see what was included, because I'm trying to overhaul the Degrassi-related articles. Thanks -- Matthew Edwards|talk|Contribs 02:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
The article was first deleted in November 2006 as a result of an AfD. After that it looks like it was created as a redirect to an inexistent title and later speedy deleted. I can provide you with the contents of the article (the version deleted in the AfD). Are you willing to improve it with intent to later put it back in the main article space? If you are just willing to view the deleted text, another form would perhaps be more appropriate. I've e-mailed the contents to you. Cheers, Spebi 09:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Hm, it hasn't arrived yet. How long do emails through Wikipedia usually take? I have no idea of my intent yet, not without seeing it. If it can be expanded on, then maybe I would. I would probably work what's there into List of Degrassi: The Next Generation miniseries episodes, or the main Degrassi: The Next Generation article. If it's just a stub then probably not, but from what I gathered from the deletion log it did list each of the 40 moments. -- Matthew|talk|Contribs 23:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
They take the same length as normal e-mails take to send. You may not have the e-mail you use regularly set as the e-mail address in your preferences, and so by sending the e-mail through the Wikipedia e-mail interface, I've sent it to the address set in your preferences. The article itself does appear to be a list of the 40 moments, however, it appears those who commented in the AfD debate were not under the impression that the list was the actual "40 Go There-ist Moments on The-N"; many were under the impression it was the creators' who decided what episodes would appear on this list. Apologies in regards to the late reply, I've had other offline matters at hand. Cheers, Spebi 06:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba (talk) 19:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
If Proposition 6:01 b, section 4.5 c of the 2008 Geographical Cabals Excluded Act passes when current members of their Honorable, the Bathrobe Cabal cast their Honorable, votes, I shall consider joining the Honorable, Bathrobe Cabal. Spebi 10:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Seb26. You have listed your name as a possible candidate for the Brisbane Wiki-Meetup Skype Call. Please note that it will begin between 12 - 12.20pm AEST (UTC+10) if there is Internet access available. If you wish, you may add me, the conference call organiser, to Skype - e.wikimedia is my username. Thanks. — Etalk 08:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
:( At least you heard my sexy voice :) dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 07:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Just wondering why you created User:FabriceMarie and then welcomed xem. I would guess you were making the account for someone, but I'm just curious. --Evan Seeds (talk)(contrib.) 05:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
There is a mailing list, unblock-en-l, which blocked users can make unblock requests and request accounts and administrators can respond to the requests. As a result of such a request, I have created an account for this person and left them a welcome message, giving them links to pages that they might find useful. Spebi 05:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Ah, i see. Thanks for satiating my curiousity. Happy editing, Evan Seeds (talk)(contrib.) 05:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
The Office (U.S. season 3)
It appears your concerns at The Office (U.S. season 3) were answered. Could you take a second look and make necessary comments on the nom. page. Thanks, Crzycheetah 20:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Requesting undo of Prod (Frïs Vodka)
I checked deletion log, not there, went to DumbBot (Prod summary) found it in archive on Dec 8. I see the justification for deletion was simply "advertising". This was not designed as advertisement or marketing for a brand of vodka, I simply considered it to be a notable vodka (one of only two mass produced brands from Denmark, as opposed to the several dozens from say, Russia) and this is written in a way that should be in line with other articles on brands of vodka. Check my user page & history for more information / justification that this was never intended as such. Sorry I missed when it was under Prod review. Bsharkey (talk) 00:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I deleted Frïs Vodka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) because its proposed deletion tag was in place for a period of 5 days, and the deletion was left uncontested. I did not take any part in proposing the deletion at all, I just carried out the deletion, however, I have restored the article in accordance with the Wikipedia:Proposed deletion policy. Looking at the article now, it does not appear to be advertising at all, however, if it is listed at Articles for deletion be prepared to back up claims of notability. Cheers, Spebi 05:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I didn't start the page, Tentac (talk·contribs) did. A proposed deletion (PROD) tag was placed on it, and according to policy, if there were no objections to the deletion, the page will be deleted after 5 days. The reason was "Written in second person--does not state notability", and the tag was placed by Zginder (talk·contribs) on November 19, 2007. After the 5 days passed, I deleted the page. However, I can restore the page for you, but be prepared to defend the article should it be listed at Articles for deletion for the same reasons the article was proposed to be deleted in the first place. Cheers, Spebi 22:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Portal:Powderfinger, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Powderfinger and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Powderfinger during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Cenarium (talk) 22:51, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for this automatic template, I'll remember to modify it when the creator is a regular. As you asked, I've responded on my talk page. Cenarium (talk) 02:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Re:Scary Movie Film Series
Im sorry, I was unaware of that. I just saw a majority of keep, but It wont happen again. Thanks.--TrUCo9311 16:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Brilliant idea! -- lucasbfrtalk 16:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks :) It'll definitely help with finding old IP check cases now. Spebi 06:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Bernstar!
The Bernstar
You have been awarded this bernstar in recognition of your contributions to the work of WikiProject Powderfinger, with respect to your great work on Powderfinger, which is now a Featured Article! Thank you! dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 07:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Lol! Thanks ;) Spebi 07:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
All Linca's work. :) With the Bernie FAC, I'm not sure what to do about Philanthropy. In Powderfinger it doesn't go in the history section, but in its own...however, Bernie's is too short to go in a L2 section, and I can't really work out what else to do with it. Any ideas? dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 23:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Powderfinger's philanthropy consists of charity concerts and the ATGD tour, which have a lot of information about them, and so it requires its own section. Bernie differs, and the only philanthropic acts he has done were the ones that Powderfinger did, so unless we can dig up some more acts or large donations, or solo performances at charity concerts that we can add, the info should be merged into Music career (in chronological order) or just be removed at all. I'm attempting the lead as we speak, btw :) Cheers, Spebi 23:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Mostly PF stuff...there's brief mention of some other things (detention centres, A Just Australia, whatnot). If you want to move it go ahead, I prefer it where it is now. But meh. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 23:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
archiving
Hello, Spebi, you achieved the unfinished case Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/2008FromKawasaki too hasty. I added more info and still confirmed sock are not blocked yet. The checkuser's result just two days ago. Please relist it and block the confirmed socks. And you also missed so many accounts when you recorded about the case on the achieve file. Thanks. --Appletrees (talk) 11:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
It seemed like the appropriate time to archive, however, I think it would be better if you just filed a new request, as the one you proposed appears to be very different and unrelated to the results of the 22 February checkuser on 2008FromKawasaki. As for the accounts missed, I only list the accounts involved when requests are first filed (i.e., the ones above "Code letter"). Cheers, Spebi 05:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
No, you didn't even block the confirmed the sock. They abusively used socks and impersonated me. You archived it without blocking them unlike your usual clerking. Besides, I'm the reporter and the listed people in groups are included in my original report at the second request. The newly added people are related to poll fraud and all related to Japanese 2channel meatpuppetry. --Appletrees (talk) 10:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
I have blocked Applletree for impersonation of you and Cvcc as an abusive sockpuppet of Koreakorea1 per checkuser evidence. I really don't see any reason to not just create a new request; you obviously have a lot of evidence that I think, for better organisation and maintenance, should be placed in a new request. It's not hard to put together another case. Sometimes you can add a small extra request to the end of an existing request, but in this situation it appears that a new request is warranted. Spebi 04:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Haha, no I think all the extra workload I gained from the RfA was what distracted me from article writing in the first place :) Spebi 05:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Template deletions
You deleted the templates (OpposeVote) and (SupportVote) as duplicates of (Support) and (Oppose) but those templates do not appear to exist. So, I don't get it. Can you explain? Avruch T 04:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Yep, I deleted those as duplicates because {{Oppose}} and {{Support}} were both deleted in this TfD from June 2005 (however, I'm quite sure that they have been deleted in another TfD in later times) and so they qualify for deletion under WP:CSD#G4. Perhaps duplicate wasn't the right word to have been used... sorry for any confusion caused. Spebi 04:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Hmm, does G4 really apply to similar content deleted two and a half years ago? Avruch T 04:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Sure does. The templates I deleted were exactly the same to the ones in the TfD (with the exception of {{NeutralVote}}, which I think used a different grey icon). The community has decided as a whole multiple times that voting templates with icons are unnecessary and should not be used, so it looks like they will stay deleted if this goes to DRV. Spebi 04:55, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Archiving old AfDs
Hi. :) I notice that you removed February 21 from Articles for deletion/Old but evidently forgot to archive it at Wikipedia:Archived delete debates. I'm sure this was a one-off oversight, and I've taken care of it, but on the very off chance that you'd forgotten this step is necessary in general, I wanted to point it out. :) Thanks. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 15:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Ah, I knew the process wasn't that simple. Thanks for that, I'll remember to do that in future :) Spebi 23:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Page deletion needed
Hi Spebi,
I don't know if you remember me. You helped me last summer when I first started editing on Wikipedia. In any case, I've made a mistake, and I'm trying to take steps to prevent it from becoming fatal. I hope you can help.
Over the past couple of months, I've been assisting a couple of gentlemen to write revisions for the article on "Social Credit". As they are not familiar with editing on Wikipedia, I suggesed they write their revisions in a text editor, and then I would help them post the changes. Last week, they sent me their changes, and I created a "Sandbox" page, where we could all to edit it together. Then yesterday, I received an email from one of them stating that he's been banned from editing Wikipedia. After checking Wikipedia guidelines, I asked him to verify. While he hasn't provided and details as to why he's been banned, he confirms that he's been banned until January 2009.
Meanwhile, I am now aware that editing Wikipedia on behalf of someone who has been banned places me at risk of losing my own editing privileges. Therefore, I have placed a tag at the top of our Sandbox page, requesting that it be deleted. Please tell me, have I handled this appropriately, and are there any further precautions I need to take? Most importantly, have I avoided getting myself "banned" or "blocked"?
Thanks for any help you can provide. David Kendall (talk) 20:55, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I've sent an e-mail to you via Wikipedia's e-mail function regarding this message. Cheers, Spebi 23:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Suggestion regarding the FA wall
I just wanted to point out that the Alternative music FA wall is cluttered again. I also have a simple suggestion that could reduce your work in shifting all that text whenever new FAs come in. Maybe if you had the left side column longer than the right side by around 5-6 entries then whenever a new FA came in, it would be easier for an editor to add a new FA entry to the wall correctly and also you would need to shift text around only once in a month or so. What do you think? Thanks, indopug (talk) 13:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Sounds like a great idea :) I've been meaning to find a better solution for displaying the FAs for a while now. Thanks for that, I'll have a go at implementing it later. Spebi 04:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Jimbo's Eyes
Oh god...that's so making me want to donate...NOT! dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 08:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Challenge
Here's a challenge as I recall you liked playing around with user pages, can you make one with a torn, old-parchment like border and a beige, mildly textured and stained background, on which the text can be set in Ye Old Englishe so as it looks like some 15th century document or something? That'd be cool and I'd use it on my talk page....Casliber (talk·contribs) 13:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
PS: Yeah, those eyes are pretty freaky.Casliber (talk·contribs) 13:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
I'll definitely make an attempt, however, I don't think I can guarantee any overly positive results ;) I have an idea in mind, hopefully, it should work out fine. Cheers, Spebi 04:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Anything you'd some up with I'd be impressed....can't wait. Casliber (talk·contribs) 10:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Nevermind, it was just a thought...Casliber (talk·contribs) 05:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
RFCU
Brrr, these eyes creep me out... Just a note since I've seen that you often don't move the cases in the main RFCU page: There's a handy script from Voice of All that allows to do it easily (as well as archiving). I'm not sure it still works, I am using a tweaked version (I can't remember why). Thanks for your help by the way ;) -- lucasbfrtalk 15:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I usually do move them from the main page, although I haven't done any archiving at all recently. I've added the script anyway, thanks :) Spebi 21:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Message to you from Kermanshahi
I see you had tagged all those accounts as Sockpuppets for Kermanshahi... However I am not the sockpuppeteer and do not have any involvement in this scandal. Twice I have been accused and both times I was not found guilty and was unbanned. I've been on wikipedia for over 1 year now and have made over 4100 constructive edits. I inted to carry on editing and have been doing so quietly, please do not involve me in this. Also you can easily see that I am a different person, geographic locations might be close but IP's are different, I edit completely different subjects, have a totally different style, ect.
Note: I do not intend to sound angry, but considering this is typed you can not see how I am saying this... So I just say it here, I am just requesting you too not involve me.:) Ceers! The Honorable Kermanshahi (talk) 19:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
My apologies, all has been fixed now. The request was filed under your name, however, evidence linking the sockpuppets to you or Mrlob came up as stale, and so it was not possible to compare the accounts to you or Mrlob. The tags have been fixed up now. Sorry about all this. Spebi 21:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Out of interest, am I, as the blocking admin, allowed to decline the request for unblock when (as with the above) it's so clearly a vandalism only account, and their request shows no merit whatsoever? Or should I leave it to another admin? GBT/C 22:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, valid unblock requests should generally be left up to another administrator to review, however, as the request in this situation is totally invalid it is fine to revert it (declining probably isn't the best option) as I have done. Use your judgement to determine what is an invalid, bad-faith unblock request and what is not. Cheers, Spebi 22:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Regarding this, I'm glad you picked up on that—I originally had it as "it", but settled on "the text", so as to prevent any confusion: "it" could possibly be misinterpreted as "the decision"—"The final decision was not to promote. Please do not modify it"—hence my further clarification :) AGK (contact) 22:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I realised all this just a few seconds after I made the original change. Thanks :) Spebi 22:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
My request for bureaucratship
Dear Spebi, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats. I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight. I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community. I was a little miserable after the results came out, so I'm going to spread the love via dancing hippos. As you do. :) I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to call me out. ~ Riana ⁂ 11:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Got Daniel's note about proxy voting for Wikimedia AU, I'll get in touch with you later if need be! :) ~ Riana ⁂ 11:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
textured backgrounds
Another, simpler idea, Is it possible to make textured backgrounds in wikicode to overlay text over? Casliber (talk·contribs) 12:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Entirely possible. Unfortunately, the software disables using the background-image: parameter when styling with CSS, although you can use a z-index (an object with a higher z-index appears on top of other objects with a lower z-index) to position it just behind the text for a textured look. Spebi (talk) 06:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Does that make the page massively memory heavy or anything? Casliber (talk·contribs) 06:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I guess it would make the whole page load a bit slower, particularly if you prefer to archive only when there is a full moon, or when you reach 100 items on the table of contents. I personally, speaking from a point of view of a person who isn't highly knowledgeable in the area of server strain, don't think a tiled background would be ideal. Although we aren't really meant to worry about server performances, I think this would be in the interest of everyone who visits your talk page. I have an alternative idea which might work, I'll talk more about it when I don't have to log out in a matter of minutes. Cheers, Spebi (talk) 06:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Habbo Hotel. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kai 06:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Ariel♥Gold 03:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Ariel♥Gold 03:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Done. Spebi 06:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Resolved
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my Talk page. --Paul Erik (talk) 05:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
