This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.

User:Bellerophon/Tools

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User page

Go to my user page
Go to my user page

Talk

Click here to goto my talk page, where you can leave a message for me.
Click here to goto my talk page, where you can leave a message for me.

Email

Please do not email me for routine matters! Only email me for matters you do not wish to discuss on-Wiki.
Please do not email me for routine matters! Only email me for matters you do not wish to discuss on-Wiki.

Adoption

Check out my adoption school
Check out my adoption school

Awards

My awards and recognitions
My awards and recognitions

Contribs

Click here to see my contributions to Wikipedia
Click here to see my contributions to Wikipedia


5

WikiDefcon 5
Very low level of vandalism

1.72 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot —05:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)


Template:R template index - redirect template index


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
Requests for unblock 81
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 55
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 14
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 152
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 18
Open sockpuppet investigations 191
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

[edit]

Administrative backlog

[edit]

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]


CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 13
Importance or significance not asserted 3
Other candidates 3

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: Request temporary semi-protection. For the past few weeks, and after any announcement with this Foundation, vandalism and/sockpuppetry occurs on these and related pages. The editing with unreliable or inaccurate sources make it difficult to read and lead to poor editing of the page Cibrian209 (talk) 15:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Note: I've reviewed the edit history of the article, and there's a lot of suspicious editing from new accounts. ECP may be necessary, but I'm on the fence, so I'll leave the decision to another administrator. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see if WP:SEMI does the trick. If it falls short, editors are welcome to relist here (with immediate effect) with a request for an WP:ECP upgrade. @Cibrian209 and Daniel Quinlan: courtesy pings. El_C 05:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Unregistered and new editors editing page without a proper understanding of the subject matter. Kambai Akau (talk) 20:58, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Repeat of of vandalism an antisemitic bent KnittingQueenKY (talk) 21:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I've warned the editor. If they continue, please report them to WP:ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Unseasoned editors with poor knowledge of the area attempting to vandalism page. Kambai Akau (talk) 21:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Breaking news on the topic will likely lead to many edits with conflicting information 50.35.75.176 (talk) 22:30, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:39, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Elli. It looks like the level of disruption increased. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Donald Trump attacked a rally. Requesting ECP as part of American politics sanctions. Ovioas,wo (talk) 22:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Not done. The article is already semi-protected and that seems to be sufficient right now. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:36, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High vandalism. High political. Post-1992 ArbCom protection needed. Page already admin-move protected, but somehow was not even EC protected. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Why is it only semi protected please make it extended confirmed protected 24.115.255.37 (talk) 22:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done. Article is protected at the current location. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Alleged assassination attempt. We may need some time to sort through this, and then will need to return it to ECP. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:56, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Protecting it would be a bit premature at this point. The article is already ECP. Let's try issuing some warnings if needed. We're dealing with EC editors. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Already seeing higher levels of IP vandalism at this page. TCMemoire 23:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Already done + duplicate 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Elli. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: existing vandalism - current event LucasR muteacc (talk) 23:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Duplicate 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Done 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Elli. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: existing vandalism - breaking news/current event LucasR muteacc (talk) 23:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Duplicate 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Elli. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:13, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Rock Machine

[edit]

Reason:: Conflict of interest editing. This editor who only edits the Rock Machine article admits to being a Rock Machine member here [1] and shows all the signs of treating Wikipedia like a battleground. --A.S. Brown (talk) 23:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Not done. This is better suited for WP:ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:35, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting extended confirmed protection to counter vandalism. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 23:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Duplicate 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't think that there has been a bunch of vandalism on the article, and we don't tend to block preventatively. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:21, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
I declined to increase the protection level earlier, but the article started getting more problematic edits from autoconfirmed editors such as [2] and [3] so it seemed appropriate to ECP it under WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Those edits aren't exactly vandalism. And I do think that six months is quite long all things considered, especially if the only basis for doing so are the sorts of edits that you've cited (which are not optimal, but appear to be good faith). — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I didn't protect the article due to vandalism. As I replied and logged, I protected it under the contentious topics procedure. There were other issues including some vandalism (although that was largely resolved by the semi-protection), but the worst problems seemed to be edits pushing various points of view, edits adding original research, poorly sourced edits, unsourced edits, and some disruptive reverting and removals. I hope this helps explain my reasoning. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: A bit of an IAR situation, but could be good until the dust settles, per an IP on the page. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 23:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. ObserveOwl (chit-chatmy doings) 23:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Fuzheado. @Fuzheado: Could you please shorten the edit protection duration from indefinite to something shorter, like a week or a month, as per WP:PREEMPTIVE? Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:52, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
I'll match the 6 months of the ECP on the article though folks may want to lift it sooner. - Fuzheado | Talk 00:07, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Respectfully, the only way for any non-autoconfirmed user to possibly participate on the page, including in the form of move requests, is to allow them to make edits to the page. I think that a six-month ECP on the article is too long, and also that a six month talk page semiprotection is not proportional to the disruption that has occurred. This is particularly concerning, given that the protecting administrator is is an active participant on the substance of discussions on that talk page; I don't think that we should be making protections of pages where we are actively involved. I would urge Fuzheado to reduce the length of the semi-protection to no more than one week. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
@Red-tailed hawk: I agree about the duration of the talk page protection. Regarding the article protection, which I made as an uninvolved administrator, I would have used a shorter duration if it seemed remotely viable. Also, six months is a common duration for WP:CT/AP enforcement. Reviewing the 2024 log, there have only been three protections (not counting full protection) shorter than six months and they were all three months long. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: WP:RUSUKR sanction enforcement; obviously falls under the sanctions. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 01:36, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 05:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: ongoing vandalism 103.29.114.44 (talk) 02:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. You might consider registering a personal account so you can watchlist the article. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Editwarring, especially on a WP:ARBGS article by rando ips.

Think Confirmed protection and reminder to 1RR rule should be ok. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:ARBGS. Gonna wait to see how effective this protection is before also adding WP:1RR. El_C 05:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Related to current events re: assassination attempt on Donald Trump. Folks have vandalized to blame her for it. JohnHawkinsBois (talk) 03:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Joyous!. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's an IP changing and block evading person who keeps returning to the article. Many blocks haven't worked whatsoever. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. In particular, many IPs object to "Kiryas Joel" being part of the metropolitan area's name. However, that's what the White House decided to do; people who disagree really need to complain to the White House, not try to edit that decision out of the article. SomethingForDeletion (talk) 05:38, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 05:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: Semi-protection no longer needed as Wikipedia:General sanctions/COVID-19 editing restrictions lifted. 49.150.14.10 (talk) 06:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

@El C: as protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 06:48, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
It should be noted that any sanctions in place at the time WP:ARBCOVID was passed were automatically converted into discretionary sanctions. That doesn't invalidate this request, however; "legacy" sanctions, to my knowledge, weren't grandfathered in when DS became CTOPs and this falls well outside the one-year enforcement privilege. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:31, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Unprotected. El_C 00:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Much of the information is false and conveys hatred against Hindus in India Jacieann (talk) 18:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Declined. This is my protection (log), as it happens, under Love Jihad, which is now a redirect. Or at least the WP:ECP upgrade was mine, the indef semi was Oshwah. Anyway, protected and logged as WP:ARBIPA, I find this request falls short and is too vague. You may use the edit request feature though, Jacieann. Thank you. El_C 01:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


At Talk:2024 shooting at a Donald Trump rally#Requested move 13 July 2024, please add the following opinion

*Oppose it is WP:TOOSOON to determine if it was an attempted assassination or not. We should absolutely not attempt to gun on this and frankly, the article was created too early as it is. Downerr2937 (talk) 00:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)}}

The Investigation section should be removed because it duplicates the Perpetrator section 61.69.211.5 (talk) 06:36, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

1 protected edit request
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Richard D'Oyly Carte (request) 2024-07-13 06:54 Not protected (log) Protected by Johnuniq on 2024-07-07: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
14 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-06-07 08:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2024-06-20 06:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-06-20 07:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox Christian leader (request) 2024-06-28 12:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox language (request) 2024-06-30 06:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
Template:Infobox software (request) 2024-07-04 04:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:College color/data (request) 2024-07-10 02:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Infobox islands/length (request) 2024-07-10 14:57 Template-protected (log) Modified by Yaris678 on 2017-03-13: "For consistency with Template:Infobox islands. An increase of edit protection and decrease of move protection."
Module:Sports color/baseball (request) 2024-07-10 18:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-08-17: "High-risk template or module 30997 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Collapse (request) 2024-07-11 13:27 Template-protected (log) Modified by Oshwah on 2017-02-17: "Highly visible template"
Template:DYK top (request) 2024-07-11 23:52 Template-protected (log) Protected by CambridgeBayWeather on 2019-06-30: "Highly visible template"
Module:External links/conf/Sports (request) 2024-07-13 15:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-08-17: "High-risk template or module 16175 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Editnotices/Page/Talk:Ideogram (request) 2024-07-13 17:19 Title blacklist (log) Matching line: Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>
Template:Designation (request) 2024-07-13 19:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:36, 14 July 2024 (UTC)


RFA= Requests for adminship

RFP= Requests for permissions

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. – Joe (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello there, I have created 67 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. AjayDas (talk) 15:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Anyone please see AjayDas's request. FightStranger (talk) 09:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
@AjayDas: With your last 25 creations taking us back to October 2020, I don't think there is a pressing need for them to be autopatrolled.  Not done – Joe (talk) 09:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Hellow All, I have created over 30 articles and recently achieved Good Article (GA) status and two of my articles were presented at DYK with 40K views. I plan to continue creating more content. Therefore, I would like to request consideration for the autopatrolled role. Thanks. Jacob0790 (talk) 04:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 04:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. I'm afraid that because of BookAuthority your creations will need to be reviewed for the time being. Schwede66 05:11, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Page mover

[edit]


I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

This user right will be super useful to me for moving unsuitable articles to draft space (eliminating the need to tag the resulting redirect with R2), dealing with articles created by new users in the wrong namespace (that I come across a lot as a vandalism patroller), and performing a round-robin move on two pages (that I try to fix occasionally when an editor copy-pastes an article). I've familiarized myself with the guidelines for moving and the article title policy. Ae245 (talk) 08:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

(Non-admin comment) @Ae245: If you use User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft, it will automatically tag the redirect for deletion, along with other things like notifying the creator of the article per WP:DRAFTIFY and warning you when the article was last edited in the past hour, such that it shouldn't be draftified yet per WP:NPPHOUR/WP:DRAFTNO. SilverLocust 💬 07:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. I'll take a look. Ae245 (talk) 11:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 16:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

I have moved quite a number of pages per WP:RM, and submitted many to WP:RM/TR. Since I wasn't of age to have this right, it was declined. Today, I logged in to Wikipedia Library, and because it worked, it means that I have reached the six months criteria for a page mover. I still want to volunteer here, and will be happy if granted. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 16:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined in the past 90 days ([5]). MusikBot talk 16:50, 13 July 2024 (UTC)


Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

Hello! I'm S-Aura. I've been editing Wikipedia for a few years. I've added new articles and learned how Wikipedia works. I'm good at finding mistakes and fixing them.

Now, I want to help review edits to make sure the information on Wikipedia is correct and reliable. I think it's important for people to have access to accurate information, and I want to help make that happen.

Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 19:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done at this time. I'm not seeing any anti-vandalism work in your Wikipedia editing history and I also have concerns about your understanding of the policy on biographies of living persons given your creation of articles like Luca Verhoeven. DanCherek (talk) 16:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

I would like to help out reviewing edits before it is published as an live article. I do have good experience. I am aware that statements must be sourced, and I know what is considered nonsense.Cwater1 (talk) 18:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Cwater1 (talk) 18:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

I've been editing on Wikipedia consistently for almost a year, focusing on fighting vandalism, fixing citations, and archival. I believe that having this permission could aid in the approval of constructive pending changes that I often come across while fighting vandalism. I have made roughly 1500 edits, and have earned the rollback permission. — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 23:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 04:41, 13 July 2024 (UTC)


Rollback

[edit]

Hi there! Requesting rollback rights to be able to use different tools for reverting vandalism. I'm open to any questions or feedback on my editing and counter-vandalism actions. Cheers. Rkieferbaum (talk) 11:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 06:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily: hi there. It's true that I seldom warn IP users that don't edit on a regular basis. I just feel like no one is going to see that warning and it might be confusing for other users from that IP. This might be a mistake on my part and I'll gladly fix it. You'll see that, with registered users, I've warned them 100% of the time or very close to that. Thanks for your time. Rkieferbaum (talk) 10:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 10:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily: of course, it's a promise. I do agree that welcoming newcomers is among the most important things we do here. Thanks. Rkieferbaum (talk) 11:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Great, thanks for confirming. Could you please now go some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users? -Fastily 03:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I've been fighting vandalism for a while now and would like to use some other tools, like WP:HUGGLE to do so more efficiently. I've grown to have a good understanding of how to fight vandalism, including WP:RPPI and WP:AIV. Thanks for considering and have a great rest of your day! MP1999 ❯❯❯ Talk 16:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I noticed you make a handful of edits, and then drop off for weeks/months at a time. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month consistently patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are always warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 10:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Template editor

[edit]

I am heavily involved with editing route diagram templates and adding new items to template:rail-interchange, with a special focus on rail lines in France for the upcoming 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris starting later this month. I have made multiple edit requests there in the past, and very recently after refamiliarizing myself with the process, I've started to do it again. I would like the ability to edit that template directly so I don't have to rely on others to do it for me. Jackdude101 talk cont 07:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Footer

[edit]

Policies and links

    My Tools

    [edit]

    ACC stuff

    [edit]

    AfC stuff

    [edit]
    [edit]
    • Replace the text with one of the following:

      {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}

      {{subst:copyvio|identify non-web source here}}

    • Go to today's section and add

      * {{subst:article-cv|PageName}} from [insert URL or identify non-web source here] ~~~~

      to the bottom of the list. Put the page's name in place of "PageName". If you do not have a URL, enter a description of the source. (This text can be copied from the top of the template after substituting it and the page name and url will be filled for you)
    • Advise the contributor of the material at their talk page. The template on the now blanked page supplies a notice you may use for that purpose.

    {{subst:cclean|url=}}

    Adoption stuff

    [edit]

    Anti-vandal stuff

    [edit]

    Special pages

    [edit]

    Quick templates

    [edit]
    • {{subst:ANI-notice}}
    • {{GOCE|user=Bellerophon|date=}}

    Sister projects

    [edit]

    Wikipedia is written by volunteer editors and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that also hosts a range of other volunteer projects: