Transboundary Haze Pollution Act of 2014
| Transboundary Haze Pollution Act 2014 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Parliament of Singapore | |
| |
| Enacted by | Parliament of Singapore |
| Enacted | 5 August 2014 |
| Assented to | 10 September 2014 |
| Commenced | 25 September 2014 |
| Status: In force | |
| Southeast Asian haze series |
|---|
 |
| History |
| Key topics |
| Responses |
| See also |
 Category |
The Transboundary Haze Pollution Act of 2014 (THPA) is a statute of the Parliament of Singapore that criminalizes conduct which causes or contributes to haze pollution in Singapore, and to provide for related matters such as deterrence. The law is designed specifically to allow legal in suing companies for environmental pollution.
Background
[edit]Since 1972, Malaysia and Singapore suffered recurrent episodes of severe air pollution due to agricultural burning in Sumatra and Kalimantan, Indonesia.[1] The ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution was intended to prevent such pollution. However, as of 2006, Indonesia and the Philippines had not ratified the Agreement. Following a severe occurrence in 2006, economist and professor at the National University of Singapore, Ivan Png, wrote a series of opinion articles in the Malaysian and Singapore media to advocate that environmental laws be extended to outlaw trans-boundary emissions.[2][3][4][5]
Overview
[edit]In August 2014, the Parliament of Singapore enacted the Transboundary Haze Pollution Act. The Act seeks to deter firms or entities in or outside Singapore from carrying out activities that contribute to transboundary haze affecting Singapore. The law targets companies, not countries,[6] which pollute and those that condone pollution by other companies or individuals that they have management control over. Failure to prevent or stop burning may hence lead the culprit to being guilty of an offence under the law, unless steps are taken to stamp out the practice.
The National Environment Agency with the courts are empowered thus in obtaining information on their concessions upon request without the need of relying on the Indonesian authorities, as well as imprisoning and/or fining targeted companies or individuals which pollute, or whose subsidiaries and/or suppliers pollute.[7]
Uses of the Act
[edit]![[icon]](/wiki/File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg?lang=en){kind=small} | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (February 2016) |
The Transboundary Haze Pollution Act (THPA) has been utilized in several significant ways since its enactment in 2014:
Issuance of Legal Notices: In 2015, the National Environment Agency (NEA) of Singapore issued legal notices to six Indonesian businesses suspected of causing fires on their lands, which contributed to the haze pollution in Singapore. These notices were a direct application of the THPA to hold companies accountable for transboundary pollution.
Investigation and Enforcement: By March 2017, the NEA had closed investigations into two companies, PT Bumi Sriwijaya Sentosa and PT Wachyuni Mandira, after determining their involvement in the fires.[8] However, investigations into four other companies remained open as of September 2021. These companies, PT Bumi Andalas Permai, PT Bumi Mekar Hijau, PT Sebangun Bumi Andalas Woods Industries, and PT Rimba Hutani Mas, are suppliers to Asia Pulp and Paper.[9][10][11][12]
Capacity Building: With the onset of the El Niño in 2015, which exacerbated forest fires in Indonesia, the THPA facilitated the building of local capacity to address these fires in Indonesian provinces such as Jambi and Riau. This capacity building included enhancing the ability to identify and address sources of pollution more effectively.
Economic Impact: The haze pollution in 2015 resulted in estimated losses of S$700 million. Environment and Water Resources Minister Masagos Zulkifli highlighted this economic impact, emphasizing the importance of the THPA in mitigating such losses through preventive and punitive measures.[13]
Public Health and Safety: The Act has been crucial in addressing public health concerns related to haze pollution. By targeting companies responsible for forest fires, the THPA helps protect the health and safety of Singapore’s residents from the adverse effects of air pollution.
International Cooperation: The effectiveness of the THPA also relies on international cooperation, particularly with Indonesian authorities. The Act empowers Singapore to request information and take legal action independently, but collaboration with Indonesia remains vital for comprehensive enforcement.
The Transboundary Haze Pollution Act of 2014 continues to be a key legislative tool for Singapore in combating transboundary haze pollution and holding responsible parties accountable.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Lee, Min Kok (2015-10-02). "Haze in Singapore: A problem dating back 40 years". The Straits Times. Archived from the original on 2 October 2015. Retrieved 3 October 2015.
- ^ "Throwing the book at polluters", Straits Times, September 9, 2006.
- ^ "Going beyond the pale", Straits Times, October 24, 2006 [with Geh Min].
- ^ "Need to enact laws to fight the haze", Star, October 9, 2006.
- ^ Cherian, Joseph, Ang Swee Hoon, Jack Loo. "Transboundary haze: Asean needs to act". Retrieved 2018-10-05.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Chan, Francis. "Singapore's Environment Minister Masagos Zulkifli says errant firms must be stopped from producing haze". Straits Times. Retrieved 20 February 2016.
- ^ Sharpe, Samuel (25 September 2015). "Anti-haze law is new, but has potential". Straits Times. Retrieved 20 February 2016.
- ^ "Haze-linked firm 'opaque with information' | The Straits Times". Straits Times. 2017-03-03. Retrieved 2022-02-20.
- ^ "NEA asks a 6th company PT Bumi Andalas Permai to take measures to mitigate haze conditions". Straits Times. 2015-10-12. Retrieved 2022-02-20.
- ^ "Indonesia draws the line on Singapore's 2015 haze investigation". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 2022-02-20.
- ^ Baffoni, Sergio. "APP still under investigation in Singapore | Environmental Paper Network". Retrieved 2022-02-20.
- ^ "Written Reply to Parliamentary Question on NEA's Investigation on Transboundary Haze in 2015 by Ms Grace Fu, Minister for Sustainability and the Environment". www.mse.gov.sg. Retrieved 2022-02-20.
- ^ "Haze cost Singapore estimated $700m last year: Minister Masagos". Asiaone. 16 March 2016. Retrieved 16 March 2016.
External links
[edit]| Constitutional law |
|  | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative law |
| |||||||||
| Alternative dispute resolution | ||||||||||
| Criminal law | ||||||||||
| Family law | ||||||||||
| Religious law | ||||||||||
| Other |
| |||||||||
| Procedure | ||||||||||