The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 05:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Overall: @Onceinawhile: Ok article but there are many missing citations after sentences that will need to be added for this to pass. Also that picture is definitely clear at that size. Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for the review Onegreatjoke. I have been through and added the missing citations. On image, the other alternative is shown on the right here - I have colorized it to make it look even clearer. Onceinawhile (talk) 23:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
I doubt the image will go through but approve for citations seeming alright. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)