West Beck is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
The contents of the Driffield Beck page were merged into West Beck on 18 October 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I propose to merge these two articles as they are the same stream, just listed under different names. Driffield Beck even has a wikilink on it that says its also known as West Beck and then links directly to this article. I imagine that there will not be too much in the way of objections, but just in case I am making a complete fool of myself, I have listed it here for votes for and against. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 20:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support The upper reaches of the River Hull have significant drainage modifications, and I would encourage replacing stubs with appropriate section-focused redirects to a comprehensive article of reasonable length explaining both the timing of changes and the present flow sequence. A map would be a most useful addition to this combined article, but a simplified chart might be assembled from the icons created for railways. See Santa Rosa Creek or Russian River (California) for examples. Thewellman (talk) 17:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I've updated the catchment/basin area to 234.3 sq.km as it was a bit low - all of the trib areas from Catchment Data Explorer have to be added together. This fits closer with the area to the gauging point of 242.2 sq.km, which should be less or equal to the total (maybe they used different methods to measure the area...Jokulhlaup (talk) 15:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
