Talk:The Daleks' Master Plan/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Rhain (talk · contribs) 04:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 23:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Given the massive improvement on recent episodes, it's good to see someone working on the classic Who episodes. Will get on this in the coming days. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhain (talk · contribs)

Six GA Criteria

[edit]

1. Article is very well written.

2. No OR, all of the info is cited in the article.

3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the episode.

4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.

5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.

6. Article uses three fair use images with proper rationale.

Lead

[edit]

-Looks good

Plot

[edit]

-Not sure if this can be fitted in, but why does Sara kill Bret if they're seemingly allied? I feel this may be confusing, but if it's impossible to clarify due to text limits, then it is fine.

Production

[edit]

-Clarify what Desperus is, since it's not brought up prior to this.

-Who are Bors, Khepren, Hyskos, Tuthmos, and the Technix? None of them are brought up prior to this.

-Daxtar, Man in Macintosh, and Scott are also not elaborated, though I feel a minor alteration of "who played the characters..." would suffice fine here.

Reception

[edit]

-Looks good

Commercial release

[edit]

-Looks good

Overall

[edit]

-A very well done article with high quality sourcing. It's overall very well-written. My only real concerns are the nitpicks above. Incredible job overall, and once the above are addressed, I'm happy to pass this article with flying colors. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pokelego999: Thanks for your comments and kind words! I've gone through and addressed your concerns; please let me know if there's anything else. Rhain (he/him) 22:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhain should be fine. Happy to pass. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]