Talk:St Eugrad's Church, Llaneugrad/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jimfbleak (talk · contribs) 14:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Just putting down a marker for now, review to follow soon Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

• Any chance of a stub for the saint?
• I think it's good practice to link less common words like "nave" and "chancel" either at the first occurrence only, or once in the lead and once in the body.
• link "vestry", "trefoil" "Art Nouveau" font (:

More tomorrow

Thanks for stopping by (again) - one of these days I ought to read Blakeney in detail and comment more fully at FAC.

• A stub-ette might have to wait for a few days, quite a hectic week or so at work (plus half-term with the kids)
• I'll check, but that was my aim too - might have missed a first mention in the body, or relinked, through writing different sections at different stages and/or moving chunks around as the whim took me.
• Will link those, particularly Font of course... early night tonight though so not now. Bencherlite^Talk 21:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

• Now added the links for your points 2 and 3. Bencherlite^Talk 14:46, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: