Talk:Nugroho Notosusanto

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleNugroho Notosusanto has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 12, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 8, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Indonesian historian and minister of education Nugroho Notosusanto (pictured) had a film-writing credit?
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 15, 2023.

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Nugroho Notosusanto/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 00:52, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Professor" and "Brigadier General" shouldn't be titles toghether, as it's confusing to the layman that "Professor Brigadier General" isn't a rank.
  • "Despite wanting to remain in the military, influence by his father he continued his education," something is wrong with this sentence.
  • "... he finished his senior high school eduction, despite wanting to continue with the Army." -- no caps on "Army" here.
  • "the University of Indonesia (Universitas Indonesia, or UI)" if it is a non-english term it should be italicized.
  • "By the early 1960s Notosusanto had abandoned his literary career, focusing instead on history." -- this is sort of an abrupt transition. What prompted this?
  • "as a modern museum showcasing the military's role." -- its role in what?
  • Legacy section is very short. Expand or merge into another section.
  • Dup links tool returns no results. Dab links tool shows no errors. No problems with external links.
  • All images seem to be tagged and licensed appropriately. There are no apparent problems with stability in the article.
Will await responses. —Ed!(talk) 04:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great work. Passing the article. —Ed!(talk) 17:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]