Talk:North Bank Depot Buildings/Archive 1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
GA?
Fantastic work, SJ Morg! Have you finished working on the article? You have indicated that you are not particularly interested in nominating the article for GA status. I'd be happy to nominate the article on your behalf if you are finished and feel that the article meets criteria. --Another Believer (Talk) 00:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Getting this article to GA status is on my to-do list as well. I would help out when I have time. And indeed, this is an impressive article already! --Jsayre64 (talk) 01:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the compliments. I stopped working on it more than two weeks ago and was not planning to do any more (for reasons I detailed on my talk page), but I think it's fine for nomination for GA status. Honestly, I had not given any thought to whether it was GA-worthy, because that doesn't sufficiently interest me (I'm glad GA exists, and that others are interested in working on it, but I prefer to spend my own WP editing time on other things), but since you two are both eager to move this forward, I took a few minutes to look over the GA criteria, and as far as I can tell, it meets them. Please feel free to go ahead and nominate it, and I'll check back on it. But if questions come up, keep in my that it's probably very unlikely that I'll be online at the same time as either of you, which may slow down communication somewhat. With luck, maybe the review will go smoothly, but I've never been involved with one before.
I just took a look at the WP:GAN process, and I see that that step is very easy. If you'd like me to nominate it (under Transport), so that neither of you would be barred from reviewing it, let me know and I'll do as soon as I see your reply(ies). Otherwise, go ahead and nominate it yourself. SJ Morg (talk) 08:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)- SJ, I would certainly encourage you to nominate the article since you expanded the article and deserve credit for the work. I was only offering to step in and nominate the article because I felt it met criteria and would make another trophy for WikiProject Oregon's mantle. If you do not nominate the article, I am happy to nominate it on your behalf. The nomination process is quite simple. --Another Believer (Talk) 15:06, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Happy to see that you nominated the article--good luck! --Another Believer (Talk) 14:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the compliments. I stopped working on it more than two weeks ago and was not planning to do any more (for reasons I detailed on my talk page), but I think it's fine for nomination for GA status. Honestly, I had not given any thought to whether it was GA-worthy, because that doesn't sufficiently interest me (I'm glad GA exists, and that others are interested in working on it, but I prefer to spend my own WP editing time on other things), but since you two are both eager to move this forward, I took a few minutes to look over the GA criteria, and as far as I can tell, it meets them. Please feel free to go ahead and nominate it, and I'll check back on it. But if questions come up, keep in my that it's probably very unlikely that I'll be online at the same time as either of you, which may slow down communication somewhat. With luck, maybe the review will go smoothly, but I've never been involved with one before.