Talk:Milagro (The X-Files)/GA1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 17:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I have to say, this probably ranks among my least favourite episodes of any television show.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Seems grand. I made some changes to ref 12, as it's better to add navigational notes in a manner that looks deliberate—sticking them in the
|title=field can lead to them being overlooked.
- Seems grand. I made some changes to ref 12, as it's better to add navigational notes in a manner that looks deliberate—sticking them in the
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Not keen on how brief the "reception" part of "Broadcast and reception" is. I have a review for it in the Shearman and Pearson book I'll add, and I think there has been mention of this episode in some of the articles we've cited before. I'll take a check through those today.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Neutral/unbiased.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- History is uncontroversial, article is stable.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Images are mostly fine. One is commons (and I can think of another article I'd like to use that in so I'm glad I saw it here); the non-free one could perhaps mention why that scene is "poignant" (it's already mentioned in its caption so it's not a big issue).
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Going to put this one on hold for now. The crit 3 work I'll handle but I want to be sure the review is sorted before I start adding information to the article. Aside from that it should be good to pass. GRAPPLE X 17:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
- OK, cool, I'll sort through some of the articles we've used to see if I've missed something.--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
- Added the Shearman and Pearson review, found some other stuff online too. Looking much more rounded now, so I'm going to pass this one. Well done. GRAPPLE X 18:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)