Talk:Martyn Woolford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleMartyn Woolford has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 10, 2007Articles for deletionDeleted
April 3, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Martyn Woolford/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:NiciVampireHeart21:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quck fail criteria:

  1. Has reliable sources
  2. Is written neutrally
  3. No valid cleanup tags
  4. Is relatively stable with no edit wars
  5. Not specifically concerned with a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint

Full review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Prose

Source reliability

  • I'm not sure about the reliability of Findmypast.com (current source #1) or Sportbox.tv (current source #3). I think if you can replace them you should, but it's not a major worry.
    • The "FAQs" page of Findmypast.com states "We are one of the leading suppliers of online family history, and pride ourselves on the quality of our records" and "We offer an entire copy of the indexes of births, marriages and deaths for England and Wales from 1837 to 2006". Do you think this helps establish it as a WP:RS? And the "About" page of Sportbox states it is provided by Opta and their homepage states "We have the biggest and best database of sports information on the planet". Again, would this help satisfy WP:RS?

Additional

Overall

  • Very nice article overall. Most of these points are relatively minor and can be fixed easily.
  • I am placing this article on hold for seven days to allow you to fix the problems listed. I'm aware that it is Easter weekend, so if you need extra time just let me know.
  • To make it easier for me to see how much work has been done, please either strike each comment when the problem has been fixed or post a note underneath each item saying it is completed.
  • Feel free request to clarification on anything; you can leave comments on my talk page or here, as I have this page watchlisted.
NiciVampireHeart21:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]